Estimation of fracture half-length with fast Gaussian pressure transient and RTA methods: Wolfcamp shale formation case study

IF 2.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Ahmed Farid Ibrahim, Ruud Weijermars
{"title":"Estimation of fracture half-length with fast Gaussian pressure transient and RTA methods: Wolfcamp shale formation case study","authors":"Ahmed Farid Ibrahim, Ruud Weijermars","doi":"10.1007/s13202-023-01694-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Accurate estimation of fracture half-lengths in shale gas and oil reservoirs is critical for optimizing stimulation design, evaluating production potential, monitoring reservoir performance, and making informed economic decisions. Assessing the dimensions of hydraulic fractures and the quality of well completions in shale gas and oil reservoirs typically involves techniques such as chemical tracers, microseismic fiber optics, and production logs, which can be time-consuming and costly. This study demonstrates an alternative approach to estimate fracture half-lengths using the Gaussian pressure transient (GPT) Method, which has recently emerged as a novel technique for quantifying pressure depletion around single wells, multiple wells, and hydraulic fractures. The GPT method is compared to the well-established rate transient analysis (RTA) method to evaluate its effectiveness in estimating fracture parameters. The study used production data from 11 wells at the hydraulic fracture test site 1 in the Midland Basin of West Texas from Upper and Middle Wolfcamp (WC) formations. The data included flow rates and pressure readings, and the fracture half-lengths of the 11 wells were individually estimated by matching the production data to historical records. The GPT method can calculate the fracture half-length from daily production data, given a certain formation permeability. Independently, the traditional RTA method was applied to separately estimate the fracture half-length. The results of the two methods (GPT and RTA) are within an acceptable, small error margin for all 5 of the Middle WC wells studied, and for 5 of the 6 Upper WC wells. The slight deviation in the case of the Upper WC well is due to the different production control and a longer time for the well to reach constant bottomhole pressure. The estimated stimulated surface area for the Middle and Upper WC wells was correlated to the injected proppant volume and the total fluid production. Applying RTA and GPT methods to the historic production data improves the fracture diagnostics accuracy by reducing the uncertainty in the estimation of fracture dimensions, for given formation permeability values of the stimulated rock volume.","PeriodicalId":16723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-023-01694-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Accurate estimation of fracture half-lengths in shale gas and oil reservoirs is critical for optimizing stimulation design, evaluating production potential, monitoring reservoir performance, and making informed economic decisions. Assessing the dimensions of hydraulic fractures and the quality of well completions in shale gas and oil reservoirs typically involves techniques such as chemical tracers, microseismic fiber optics, and production logs, which can be time-consuming and costly. This study demonstrates an alternative approach to estimate fracture half-lengths using the Gaussian pressure transient (GPT) Method, which has recently emerged as a novel technique for quantifying pressure depletion around single wells, multiple wells, and hydraulic fractures. The GPT method is compared to the well-established rate transient analysis (RTA) method to evaluate its effectiveness in estimating fracture parameters. The study used production data from 11 wells at the hydraulic fracture test site 1 in the Midland Basin of West Texas from Upper and Middle Wolfcamp (WC) formations. The data included flow rates and pressure readings, and the fracture half-lengths of the 11 wells were individually estimated by matching the production data to historical records. The GPT method can calculate the fracture half-length from daily production data, given a certain formation permeability. Independently, the traditional RTA method was applied to separately estimate the fracture half-length. The results of the two methods (GPT and RTA) are within an acceptable, small error margin for all 5 of the Middle WC wells studied, and for 5 of the 6 Upper WC wells. The slight deviation in the case of the Upper WC well is due to the different production control and a longer time for the well to reach constant bottomhole pressure. The estimated stimulated surface area for the Middle and Upper WC wells was correlated to the injected proppant volume and the total fluid production. Applying RTA and GPT methods to the historic production data improves the fracture diagnostics accuracy by reducing the uncertainty in the estimation of fracture dimensions, for given formation permeability values of the stimulated rock volume.

Abstract Image

基于快速高斯压力瞬态和RTA方法的裂缝半长估计——以Wolfcamp页岩为例
准确估计页岩油气储层裂缝半长对于优化增产设计、评估生产潜力、监测储层动态以及做出明智的经济决策至关重要。评估页岩油气储层水力裂缝的尺寸和完井质量通常涉及化学示踪剂、微地震光纤和生产测井等技术,这些技术既耗时又昂贵。该研究展示了一种利用高斯压力瞬变(GPT)方法估算裂缝半长的替代方法,该方法最近成为一种量化单井、多井和水力裂缝压力损耗的新技术。将GPT方法与已建立的速率瞬态分析(RTA)方法进行了比较,以评估其在估计裂缝参数方面的有效性。该研究使用了德克萨斯州西部Midland盆地1号水力压裂试验场11口井的生产数据,这些井来自Wolfcamp (WC)上部和中部地层。数据包括流量和压力读数,通过将生产数据与历史记录相匹配,分别估计了11口井的裂缝半长。在给定一定地层渗透率的情况下,GPT方法可以根据日产量数据计算裂缝半长。另外,采用传统的RTA方法单独估计骨折半长。两种方法(GPT和RTA)的结果在一个可接受的小误差范围内,对所有5口中部井和6口上部井中的5口进行了研究。上WC井的轻微偏差是由于不同的生产控制以及井达到恒定井底压力所需的时间较长。中上WC井的增产面积与注入支撑剂体积和总产液量相关。将RTA和GPT方法应用于历史生产数据,通过减少裂缝尺寸估计的不确定性,提高了裂缝诊断的准确性,对于给定的增产岩石体积的地层渗透率值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is an international open access journal that publishes original and review articles as well as book reviews on leading edge studies in the field of petroleum engineering, petroleum geology and exploration geophysics and the implementation of related technologies to the development and management of oil and gas reservoirs from their discovery through their entire production cycle. Focusing on: Reservoir characterization and modeling Unconventional oil and gas reservoirs Geophysics: Acquisition and near surface Geophysics Modeling and Imaging Geophysics: Interpretation Geophysics: Processing Production Engineering Formation Evaluation Reservoir Management Petroleum Geology Enhanced Recovery Geomechanics Drilling Completions The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice as detailed here: https://www.springer.com/us/editorial-policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信