Arturo Abundes-Velasco, Efraín Sánchez-Pérez, Gian M. Jiménez-Rodriguez, Francisco J. Molina-Méndez, Rafael Herrera-Elizalde, Tomás Pulido-Zamudio, Humberto Álvarez-Rosales, Juan Villegas-Juache, Sebastián Aceves-Díaz González, David A. Parra-Rodríguez, Francisco J. Cruz-Enríquez, Farid A. Cobos-Reyes, Eduardo A. Aguilar-Torres, Enid A. Islas-Navarro, José C. Nuñez-Gómez, Marco A. Peña-Duque
{"title":"Evaluación del AMBU automatizado ESSI-1 INC diseñado en el Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez","authors":"Arturo Abundes-Velasco, Efraín Sánchez-Pérez, Gian M. Jiménez-Rodriguez, Francisco J. Molina-Méndez, Rafael Herrera-Elizalde, Tomás Pulido-Zamudio, Humberto Álvarez-Rosales, Juan Villegas-Juache, Sebastián Aceves-Díaz González, David A. Parra-Rodríguez, Francisco J. Cruz-Enríquez, Farid A. Cobos-Reyes, Eduardo A. Aguilar-Torres, Enid A. Islas-Navarro, José C. Nuñez-Gómez, Marco A. Peña-Duque","doi":"10.24875/acm.22000042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe objectives of this study were to evaluate an automated device for ventilatory support based on AMBU manufactured in March 2020.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe ESSI-1 INC was evaluated through pulmonary mechanics and physiology parameters through compensatory spirometer tests (TISSOTs), and an artificial lung Model5600i Dual Adult PNEU VIEW SYSTEM; it was also compared to the anesthetic ventilatory support equipment (AEONMED 7500) in porcine models, measuring ventilatory, hemodynamic and gasometric parameters.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThis equipment (ESSI-1 INC) was successfully tested by mechanical and biological models, such as pigs in which its performance was evaluated in terms of variability of tidal volume, ventilation frequency, and I/E relationship versus the manual performance of two medical interns. All the results turned out as expected and were satisfactory.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIt is safe and effective equipment and should be tested and used in diverse clinical conditions to standardize the ventilatory safety and care of patients who require it.","PeriodicalId":440753,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Cardiología de México","volume":"27 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Cardiología de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/acm.22000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The objectives of this study were to evaluate an automated device for ventilatory support based on AMBU manufactured in March 2020.
METHODS
The ESSI-1 INC was evaluated through pulmonary mechanics and physiology parameters through compensatory spirometer tests (TISSOTs), and an artificial lung Model5600i Dual Adult PNEU VIEW SYSTEM; it was also compared to the anesthetic ventilatory support equipment (AEONMED 7500) in porcine models, measuring ventilatory, hemodynamic and gasometric parameters.
RESULTS
This equipment (ESSI-1 INC) was successfully tested by mechanical and biological models, such as pigs in which its performance was evaluated in terms of variability of tidal volume, ventilation frequency, and I/E relationship versus the manual performance of two medical interns. All the results turned out as expected and were satisfactory.
CONCLUSIONS
It is safe and effective equipment and should be tested and used in diverse clinical conditions to standardize the ventilatory safety and care of patients who require it.