Racial Polarization in Attitudes towards the Criminal Legal System

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Karen Hanhee Lee, Carmen Gutierrez, Becky Pettit
{"title":"Racial Polarization in Attitudes towards the Criminal Legal System","authors":"Karen Hanhee Lee, Carmen Gutierrez, Becky Pettit","doi":"10.1093/socpro/spad051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Existing research often views attitudes toward the U.S. criminal legal system as reflections of punitive sentiment, overlooking racial differences in how people respond to questions related to crime and punishment. Using over four decades of nationally representative survey data from the General Social Survey, we employ latent class analysis to examine racial variation in attitudes about the U.S. criminal legal system across time. We find that among White Americans, support for increased spending to combat crime corresponds with support for harsher courts and the death penalty. In contrast, many Black Americans support increased spending on crime but oppose harsher courts and the death penalty, indicating simultaneous concern about crime and a more punitive criminal legal system. Although aggregate trends in punitiveness change similarly across race and time, we show that while preferences for punitive policies remain high among White Americans, the proportion of Black Americans who are simultaneously concerned about crime and a punitive criminal legal system rose from 14 percent in 1994 to 56 percent in 2018. These results highlight the salience of race in shaping how people evaluate the criminal legal system and draw attention to racial polarization in views on punishment and justice.","PeriodicalId":48307,"journal":{"name":"Social Problems","volume":"29 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spad051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Existing research often views attitudes toward the U.S. criminal legal system as reflections of punitive sentiment, overlooking racial differences in how people respond to questions related to crime and punishment. Using over four decades of nationally representative survey data from the General Social Survey, we employ latent class analysis to examine racial variation in attitudes about the U.S. criminal legal system across time. We find that among White Americans, support for increased spending to combat crime corresponds with support for harsher courts and the death penalty. In contrast, many Black Americans support increased spending on crime but oppose harsher courts and the death penalty, indicating simultaneous concern about crime and a more punitive criminal legal system. Although aggregate trends in punitiveness change similarly across race and time, we show that while preferences for punitive policies remain high among White Americans, the proportion of Black Americans who are simultaneously concerned about crime and a punitive criminal legal system rose from 14 percent in 1994 to 56 percent in 2018. These results highlight the salience of race in shaping how people evaluate the criminal legal system and draw attention to racial polarization in views on punishment and justice.
刑事法制观念的种族分化
现有的研究往往将对美国刑事法律制度的态度视为惩罚情绪的反映,忽视了人们对犯罪和惩罚相关问题的反应的种族差异。利用来自综合社会调查的40多年的全国代表性调查数据,我们采用潜在阶级分析来研究不同时期对美国刑事法律制度态度的种族差异。我们发现,在美国白人中,支持增加打击犯罪的支出与支持更严厉的法庭和死刑是一致的。相比之下,许多美国黑人支持增加对犯罪的支出,但反对更严厉的法庭和死刑,这表明他们同时关注犯罪和更具惩罚性的刑事司法体系。尽管惩罚的总体趋势在种族和时间上发生了类似的变化,但我们发现,尽管美国白人对惩罚性政策的偏好仍然很高,但同时关注犯罪和惩罚性刑事法律制度的黑人比例从1994年的14%上升到2018年的56%。这些结果突出了种族在塑造人们如何评价刑事法律制度方面的重要性,并引起了人们对惩罚和正义观点上的种族两极分化的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Problems
Social Problems SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Social Problems brings to the fore influential sociological findings and theories that have the ability to help us both better understand--and better deal with--our complex social environment. Some of the areas covered by the journal include: •Conflict, Social Action, and Change •Crime and Juvenile Delinquency •Drinking and Drugs •Health, Health Policy, and Health Services •Mental Health •Poverty, Class, and Inequality •Racial and Ethnic Minorities •Sexual Behavior, Politics, and Communities •Youth, Aging, and the Life Course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信