Tiempo de recuperación del nodo sinusal corregido como prueba de tamizaje en pacientes con aleteo atrial típico postablación para predecir la implantación de marcapasos

Reynie L. Reinoso-Gonell, Yasmín Céspedes-Batista, Nicolle M. Batlle-Núñez, Irvianny Madera-Ferreira, Anthony Gutiérrez-Martínez, José L. Morales-Velázquez, Santiago Nava-Townsend, Manlio F. Márquez-Murillo, Luis C. Tejera-Jurado, Jorge R. Gómez-Flores, Luis Colin-Lizalde, Pedro Iturralde-Torres
{"title":"Tiempo de recuperación del nodo sinusal corregido como prueba de tamizaje en pacientes con aleteo atrial típico postablación para predecir la implantación de marcapasos","authors":"Reynie L. Reinoso-Gonell, Yasmín Céspedes-Batista, Nicolle M. Batlle-Núñez, Irvianny Madera-Ferreira, Anthony Gutiérrez-Martínez, José L. Morales-Velázquez, Santiago Nava-Townsend, Manlio F. Márquez-Murillo, Luis C. Tejera-Jurado, Jorge R. Gómez-Flores, Luis Colin-Lizalde, Pedro Iturralde-Torres","doi":"10.24875/acm.22000031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe objective of the study was to establish the prognostic value of CSNRT regarding the necessity for pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial flutter (AFL) post-ablation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis prospective cohort study, conducted at the National Institute of Cardiology \"Ignacio Chavez\" in Mexico City, assessed patients who had undergone ablation procedures to correct AFL, posterior to which an autonomic blockade was performed, and CSNRT was measured.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe sample for this investigation was 40 patients. These were subdivided into two study groups depending on their requirement of pacemaker implant post-ablation (Pacemaker P, No Pacemaker NP). Sinus node (SN) dysfunction was diagnosed in 13 (32.5%) of the 40 participants, 10 (71.43%) of which required a pacemaker implant, while only 4 participants (28.57%) with normal SN function required pacemakers. Ten out of the 14 patients (71.43%) who required a pacemaker had an elevated CSNRT > 500 ms (p ≤ 0.01). Post-ablation CSNRT mean was 383.54 ms ± 67.96 ms in the NP group versus 1972.57 ms ± 3423.56 ms in the P group. Furthermore, SN pause in the P group had a mean of 1.86 s ± 0.96 s versus the NP group with 1.196 s ± 0.52 s.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nCSNRT has the potential to be a quantitative prognostic tool for the assessment of future pacemaker implants in patients with AFL post-ablation. This could aid in the timely diagnosis of sinus node dysfunction, which could, in the long run, result in the reduction of cardiac functional capacity loss due to cardiac remodeling.","PeriodicalId":440753,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Cardiología de México","volume":"46 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Cardiología de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/acm.22000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to establish the prognostic value of CSNRT regarding the necessity for pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial flutter (AFL) post-ablation. METHODS This prospective cohort study, conducted at the National Institute of Cardiology "Ignacio Chavez" in Mexico City, assessed patients who had undergone ablation procedures to correct AFL, posterior to which an autonomic blockade was performed, and CSNRT was measured. RESULTS The sample for this investigation was 40 patients. These were subdivided into two study groups depending on their requirement of pacemaker implant post-ablation (Pacemaker P, No Pacemaker NP). Sinus node (SN) dysfunction was diagnosed in 13 (32.5%) of the 40 participants, 10 (71.43%) of which required a pacemaker implant, while only 4 participants (28.57%) with normal SN function required pacemakers. Ten out of the 14 patients (71.43%) who required a pacemaker had an elevated CSNRT > 500 ms (p ≤ 0.01). Post-ablation CSNRT mean was 383.54 ms ± 67.96 ms in the NP group versus 1972.57 ms ± 3423.56 ms in the P group. Furthermore, SN pause in the P group had a mean of 1.86 s ± 0.96 s versus the NP group with 1.196 s ± 0.52 s. CONCLUSION CSNRT has the potential to be a quantitative prognostic tool for the assessment of future pacemaker implants in patients with AFL post-ablation. This could aid in the timely diagnosis of sinus node dysfunction, which could, in the long run, result in the reduction of cardiac functional capacity loss due to cardiac remodeling.
在典型消融后心房扑动患者中,窦房结校正恢复时间作为筛选试验,以预测起搏器的植入
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信