Tiempo de recuperación del nodo sinusal corregido como prueba de tamizaje en pacientes con aleteo atrial típico postablación para predecir la implantación de marcapasos
Reynie L. Reinoso-Gonell, Yasmín Céspedes-Batista, Nicolle M. Batlle-Núñez, Irvianny Madera-Ferreira, Anthony Gutiérrez-Martínez, José L. Morales-Velázquez, Santiago Nava-Townsend, Manlio F. Márquez-Murillo, Luis C. Tejera-Jurado, Jorge R. Gómez-Flores, Luis Colin-Lizalde, Pedro Iturralde-Torres
{"title":"Tiempo de recuperación del nodo sinusal corregido como prueba de tamizaje en pacientes con aleteo atrial típico postablación para predecir la implantación de marcapasos","authors":"Reynie L. Reinoso-Gonell, Yasmín Céspedes-Batista, Nicolle M. Batlle-Núñez, Irvianny Madera-Ferreira, Anthony Gutiérrez-Martínez, José L. Morales-Velázquez, Santiago Nava-Townsend, Manlio F. Márquez-Murillo, Luis C. Tejera-Jurado, Jorge R. Gómez-Flores, Luis Colin-Lizalde, Pedro Iturralde-Torres","doi":"10.24875/acm.22000031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe objective of the study was to establish the prognostic value of CSNRT regarding the necessity for pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial flutter (AFL) post-ablation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis prospective cohort study, conducted at the National Institute of Cardiology \"Ignacio Chavez\" in Mexico City, assessed patients who had undergone ablation procedures to correct AFL, posterior to which an autonomic blockade was performed, and CSNRT was measured.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe sample for this investigation was 40 patients. These were subdivided into two study groups depending on their requirement of pacemaker implant post-ablation (Pacemaker P, No Pacemaker NP). Sinus node (SN) dysfunction was diagnosed in 13 (32.5%) of the 40 participants, 10 (71.43%) of which required a pacemaker implant, while only 4 participants (28.57%) with normal SN function required pacemakers. Ten out of the 14 patients (71.43%) who required a pacemaker had an elevated CSNRT > 500 ms (p ≤ 0.01). Post-ablation CSNRT mean was 383.54 ms ± 67.96 ms in the NP group versus 1972.57 ms ± 3423.56 ms in the P group. Furthermore, SN pause in the P group had a mean of 1.86 s ± 0.96 s versus the NP group with 1.196 s ± 0.52 s.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nCSNRT has the potential to be a quantitative prognostic tool for the assessment of future pacemaker implants in patients with AFL post-ablation. This could aid in the timely diagnosis of sinus node dysfunction, which could, in the long run, result in the reduction of cardiac functional capacity loss due to cardiac remodeling.","PeriodicalId":440753,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Cardiología de México","volume":"46 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Cardiología de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/acm.22000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the study was to establish the prognostic value of CSNRT regarding the necessity for pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial flutter (AFL) post-ablation.
METHODS
This prospective cohort study, conducted at the National Institute of Cardiology "Ignacio Chavez" in Mexico City, assessed patients who had undergone ablation procedures to correct AFL, posterior to which an autonomic blockade was performed, and CSNRT was measured.
RESULTS
The sample for this investigation was 40 patients. These were subdivided into two study groups depending on their requirement of pacemaker implant post-ablation (Pacemaker P, No Pacemaker NP). Sinus node (SN) dysfunction was diagnosed in 13 (32.5%) of the 40 participants, 10 (71.43%) of which required a pacemaker implant, while only 4 participants (28.57%) with normal SN function required pacemakers. Ten out of the 14 patients (71.43%) who required a pacemaker had an elevated CSNRT > 500 ms (p ≤ 0.01). Post-ablation CSNRT mean was 383.54 ms ± 67.96 ms in the NP group versus 1972.57 ms ± 3423.56 ms in the P group. Furthermore, SN pause in the P group had a mean of 1.86 s ± 0.96 s versus the NP group with 1.196 s ± 0.52 s.
CONCLUSION
CSNRT has the potential to be a quantitative prognostic tool for the assessment of future pacemaker implants in patients with AFL post-ablation. This could aid in the timely diagnosis of sinus node dysfunction, which could, in the long run, result in the reduction of cardiac functional capacity loss due to cardiac remodeling.