The prevalence of invertebrate bioerosion on Mesozoic marine reptile bone from the Jurassic and Cretaceous of the United Kingdom: new data and implications for taphonomy and environment

IF 2 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sarah Jamison-Todd, Paul Upchurch, Philip D. Mannion
{"title":"The prevalence of invertebrate bioerosion on Mesozoic marine reptile bone from the Jurassic and Cretaceous of the United Kingdom: new data and implications for taphonomy and environment","authors":"Sarah Jamison-Todd, Paul Upchurch, Philip D. Mannion","doi":"10.1017/s0016756823000651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Invertebrate bioerosion on fossil bone can contribute to reconstructions of benthic taxonomic assemblages and inform us about oxygenation levels, water depth and exposure time on the seafloor prior to burial. However, these traces are not commonly described in the fossil record. To date, there have been only 13 published studies describing a total of 15 instances of invertebrate bioerosion on marine reptile fossil bones from the Mesozoic globally. We surveyed the collections of several UK museums with substantial occurrences of Mesozoic marine reptiles for evidence of invertebrate bioerosion. Here, we document 153 specimens exhibiting 171 newly recorded instances of invertebrate bioerosion on Jurassic and Cretaceous marine reptile bones. Several major bioeroding taxonomic groups are identified. Within the geological strata of the United Kingdom, there is a higher prevalence of bioerosion in the Cretaceous relative to the Jurassic, despite greater sampling of specimens from the Jurassic. Although biotic turnover and food web restructuring might have played a role, potentially pertaining to heightened productivity during the later stages of the Mesozoic Marine Revolution, we consider it more likely that this temporal change corresponds to differences in depositional environment and taphonomic history between the sampled rock units. In particular, the Cretaceous deposits are characterized by heightened oxygenation levels relative to their Jurassic counterparts, as well as reworking, which would have allowed two phases of bioerosion. A spatiotemporally broader dataset on invertebrate bioerosion on vertebrate bone will be important in further testing this and other hypotheses.","PeriodicalId":12612,"journal":{"name":"Geological Magazine","volume":"2023 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016756823000651","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Invertebrate bioerosion on fossil bone can contribute to reconstructions of benthic taxonomic assemblages and inform us about oxygenation levels, water depth and exposure time on the seafloor prior to burial. However, these traces are not commonly described in the fossil record. To date, there have been only 13 published studies describing a total of 15 instances of invertebrate bioerosion on marine reptile fossil bones from the Mesozoic globally. We surveyed the collections of several UK museums with substantial occurrences of Mesozoic marine reptiles for evidence of invertebrate bioerosion. Here, we document 153 specimens exhibiting 171 newly recorded instances of invertebrate bioerosion on Jurassic and Cretaceous marine reptile bones. Several major bioeroding taxonomic groups are identified. Within the geological strata of the United Kingdom, there is a higher prevalence of bioerosion in the Cretaceous relative to the Jurassic, despite greater sampling of specimens from the Jurassic. Although biotic turnover and food web restructuring might have played a role, potentially pertaining to heightened productivity during the later stages of the Mesozoic Marine Revolution, we consider it more likely that this temporal change corresponds to differences in depositional environment and taphonomic history between the sampled rock units. In particular, the Cretaceous deposits are characterized by heightened oxygenation levels relative to their Jurassic counterparts, as well as reworking, which would have allowed two phases of bioerosion. A spatiotemporally broader dataset on invertebrate bioerosion on vertebrate bone will be important in further testing this and other hypotheses.
英国侏罗纪和白垩纪中生代海洋爬行动物骨骼上无脊椎动物生物侵蚀的流行:新数据及其对地药学和环境的影响
无脊椎动物对化石骨的生物侵蚀有助于底栖生物分类组合的重建,并告诉我们埋藏前海底的氧合水平、水深和暴露时间。然而,这些痕迹在化石记录中并不常见。迄今为止,只有13篇已发表的研究报告描述了全球中生代海洋爬行动物化石骨骼上无脊椎动物生物侵蚀的15个实例。为了寻找无脊椎动物生物侵蚀的证据,我们调查了英国几家博物馆收藏的大量中生代海洋爬行动物。在这里,我们记录了153个标本,展示了171个新记录的侏罗纪和白垩纪海洋爬行动物骨骼上无脊椎动物生物侵蚀的实例。确定了几个主要的生物侵蚀分类类群。在英国的地质地层中,相对于侏罗纪,白垩纪的生物侵蚀更为普遍,尽管从侏罗纪采集了更多的标本。虽然生物的更替和食物网的重组可能起到了一定的作用,可能与中生代海洋革命后期生产力的提高有关,但我们认为这种时间变化更有可能与采样岩石单元之间沉积环境和地面学历史的差异相对应。特别是,白垩纪沉积层的特征是相对于侏罗纪沉积层的高氧合水平,以及再加工,这将允许两个阶段的生物侵蚀。一个关于无脊椎动物对脊椎动物骨骼的生物侵蚀的时空更广泛的数据集对于进一步验证这一假设和其他假设将是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geological Magazine
Geological Magazine 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Geological Magazine, established in 1864, is one of the oldest and best-known periodicals in earth sciences. It publishes original scientific papers covering the complete spectrum of geological topics, with high quality illustrations. Its worldwide circulation and high production values, combined with Rapid Communications and Book Review sections keep the journal at the forefront of the field. This journal is included in the Cambridge Journals open access initiative, Cambridge Open Option.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信