A64 Preparing prequalifying health-care students to deliver collaborative, patient-centred care for those with mental health difficulties

Robyn Stiger, Lorraine Whatley, Janice Watson, Kate Saunders, Christopher Kowalski
{"title":"A64 Preparing prequalifying health-care students to deliver collaborative, patient-centred care for those with mental health difficulties","authors":"Robyn Stiger, Lorraine Whatley, Janice Watson, Kate Saunders, Christopher Kowalski","doi":"10.54531/lbmt8984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative, patient-centred care delivered by interprofessional clinical teams is known to improve healthcare efficiency, as well as patient and staff satisfaction [1]. Therefore, inclusion of interprofessional education as an accredited element within prequalifying healthcare programmes is growing [2]. The use of simulation-based learning may provide an effective method of delivering high quality, safe and effective interprofessional education in challenging but transferable settings like caring for patients presenting with mental health difficulties. A half-day simulation course consisting of three scenarios was designed. Actors trained in the portrayal of mental health difficulties by service users were workshopped into the scenarios, with representation from each professional group to enhance authenticity. Each scenario was followed by a facilitated debrief that allowed for whole group learning, using a debrief model [3]. Effective interprofessional collaboration and professional representation was modelled by an interprofessional faculty. Facilitators were encouraged to reflect on their own biases around other professions, recognizing the impact these may have on their debriefing choices. During debriefing, participants were encouraged to consider the impact that collaborative practice has on patient-centred care. Facilitators were encouraged to draw out unconscious biases and highlight issues that can inhibit the successful delivery of collaborative, patient-centred care. Staff development was supported through mentorship and faculty debriefing. The pilot programme ran four times for 72 nursing and medical students. 50 of the 72 (69%) participants provided anonymous feedback via a mixed methods questionnaire. Of these, 54% were medical students and 46% were nursing students. On a Likert scale (1 = poor, 10 = excellent), all participants rated the experience 7/10 or above, with 74% rating it 9 or 10/10. Likert scale questions regarding applicability, course design elements and perceived learning were also highly rated. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the free text questions by two discrete researchers. The results were broadly categorized into learner experience and learning outcomes. Participant perspectives of the benefits of the simulation training on aspects of interprofessional collaboration can be seen in Participant perspectives of the benefits of the simulation training on aspects of interprofessional collaboration This pilot demonstrates that interprofessional education can be successfully delivered in this way, and has been adopted into the medical and nursing student curricula. The next run includes 300 students from medical, nursing and allied health programmes across two institutions, and will be re-evaluated. A qualitative research study to explore the learning that higher educational institutions can gain by delivering interprofessional learning using simulation is also underway. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"24 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/lbmt8984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative, patient-centred care delivered by interprofessional clinical teams is known to improve healthcare efficiency, as well as patient and staff satisfaction [1]. Therefore, inclusion of interprofessional education as an accredited element within prequalifying healthcare programmes is growing [2]. The use of simulation-based learning may provide an effective method of delivering high quality, safe and effective interprofessional education in challenging but transferable settings like caring for patients presenting with mental health difficulties. A half-day simulation course consisting of three scenarios was designed. Actors trained in the portrayal of mental health difficulties by service users were workshopped into the scenarios, with representation from each professional group to enhance authenticity. Each scenario was followed by a facilitated debrief that allowed for whole group learning, using a debrief model [3]. Effective interprofessional collaboration and professional representation was modelled by an interprofessional faculty. Facilitators were encouraged to reflect on their own biases around other professions, recognizing the impact these may have on their debriefing choices. During debriefing, participants were encouraged to consider the impact that collaborative practice has on patient-centred care. Facilitators were encouraged to draw out unconscious biases and highlight issues that can inhibit the successful delivery of collaborative, patient-centred care. Staff development was supported through mentorship and faculty debriefing. The pilot programme ran four times for 72 nursing and medical students. 50 of the 72 (69%) participants provided anonymous feedback via a mixed methods questionnaire. Of these, 54% were medical students and 46% were nursing students. On a Likert scale (1 = poor, 10 = excellent), all participants rated the experience 7/10 or above, with 74% rating it 9 or 10/10. Likert scale questions regarding applicability, course design elements and perceived learning were also highly rated. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the free text questions by two discrete researchers. The results were broadly categorized into learner experience and learning outcomes. Participant perspectives of the benefits of the simulation training on aspects of interprofessional collaboration can be seen in Participant perspectives of the benefits of the simulation training on aspects of interprofessional collaboration This pilot demonstrates that interprofessional education can be successfully delivered in this way, and has been adopted into the medical and nursing student curricula. The next run includes 300 students from medical, nursing and allied health programmes across two institutions, and will be re-evaluated. A qualitative research study to explore the learning that higher educational institutions can gain by delivering interprofessional learning using simulation is also underway. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
A64培养合格的保健专业学生,为有精神健康困难的人提供协作式的、以病人为中心的护理
众所周知,由跨专业临床团队提供的协作式、以患者为中心的护理可以提高医疗效率,以及患者和工作人员的满意度[1]。因此,将跨专业教育作为资格预审医疗保健计划的认可元素正在增长[2]。使用基于模拟的学习可以提供一种有效的方法,在具有挑战性但可转移的环境中提供高质量、安全和有效的跨专业教育,例如照顾有精神健康困难的患者。设计了一个由三个场景组成的半天模拟课程。在服务使用者描述心理健康困难方面受过培训的演员被安排到情景中,每个专业团体都派代表参加,以增强真实性。每个场景之后都有一个方便的汇报,允许整个小组学习,使用汇报模型[3]。有效的跨专业合作和专业代表由跨专业的教师示范。鼓励主持人反思自己对其他职业的偏见,认识到这些偏见可能对他们的汇报选择产生的影响。在汇报过程中,鼓励参与者考虑协作实践对以患者为中心的护理的影响。鼓励辅导员排除无意识的偏见,并强调可能阻碍成功提供以患者为中心的协作式护理的问题。通过指导和教师汇报来支持员工发展。该试点方案对72名护理和医科学生进行了四次培训。72名参与者中有50名(69%)通过混合方法问卷提供了匿名反馈。其中54%为医学生,46%为护生。在李克特量表上(1 =差,10 =优秀),所有参与者对体验的评价都在7/10或以上,74%的人评价为9或10/10。关于适用性、课程设计元素和感知学习的李克特量表问题也得到了很高的评价。主题分析法用于分析两位独立研究者提出的自由文本问题。研究结果大致分为学习者体验和学习成果两大类。参与者对模拟培训在跨专业协作方面的益处的看法见参与者对模拟培训在跨专业协作方面的益处的看法。该试点表明,跨专业教育可以通过这种方式成功实施,并已被纳入医学和护理学生课程。下一轮包括来自两所院校的医疗、护理和相关健康项目的300名学生,并将进行重新评估。一项定性研究也在进行中,旨在探索高等教育机构通过使用模拟提供跨专业学习而获得的学习。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信