The limits of voluntary measures: Packaging the plastic pollution problem in Australia

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Stephen Jones, Brian W. Head
{"title":"The limits of voluntary measures: Packaging the plastic pollution problem in Australia","authors":"Stephen Jones,&nbsp;Brian W. Head","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The massive global growth in the production, use, and disposal of plastic materials has generated a pollution crisis in many countries. In Australia, debates about how to address this multi-faceted challenge have lacked the political urgency necessary for adopting strong reform measures. Consistent with the early stages of other sustainability debates, the industrial producers and distributors of plastic materials have been successful in prioritising voluntary measures, such as recycling materials and local authority collection schemes, to mitigate the problem, instead of agreeing to implement enforceable reduction targets. This paper examines Australian measures to manage plastic waste with a focus on how particular policy instruments were favoured and endured and how a greater focus on the full range of policy instruments—market based, regulatory, and voluntary—could generate more effective solutions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Choice of effective policy instruments is crucial for tackling sustainability problems.</li>\n \n <li>Policy instruments employed by Australian governments to manage plastic waste have been ineffective.</li>\n \n <li>Moreover, policy settings do not support effective co-ordination between key stakeholders for the reduction of plastic pollution.</li>\n \n <li>Policy advisors should recognise the limits of voluntary approaches and market-based mechanisms, and consider introducing clear and mandatory pathways to achieve policy targets.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"83 4","pages":"647-665"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12614","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The massive global growth in the production, use, and disposal of plastic materials has generated a pollution crisis in many countries. In Australia, debates about how to address this multi-faceted challenge have lacked the political urgency necessary for adopting strong reform measures. Consistent with the early stages of other sustainability debates, the industrial producers and distributors of plastic materials have been successful in prioritising voluntary measures, such as recycling materials and local authority collection schemes, to mitigate the problem, instead of agreeing to implement enforceable reduction targets. This paper examines Australian measures to manage plastic waste with a focus on how particular policy instruments were favoured and endured and how a greater focus on the full range of policy instruments—market based, regulatory, and voluntary—could generate more effective solutions.

Points for practitioners

  • Choice of effective policy instruments is crucial for tackling sustainability problems.
  • Policy instruments employed by Australian governments to manage plastic waste have been ineffective.
  • Moreover, policy settings do not support effective co-ordination between key stakeholders for the reduction of plastic pollution.
  • Policy advisors should recognise the limits of voluntary approaches and market-based mechanisms, and consider introducing clear and mandatory pathways to achieve policy targets.
自愿措施的限制:澳大利亚包装塑料污染问题
塑料材料的生产、使用和处置在全球范围内的大规模增长,在许多国家引发了污染危机。在澳大利亚,关于如何应对这一多方面挑战的辩论缺乏采取强有力改革措施所需的政治紧迫性。与其他可持续性辩论的早期阶段一致,塑料材料的工业生产商和分销商已经成功地优先考虑自愿措施,如回收材料和地方当局收集计划,以缓解问题,而不是同意执行可执行的减少目标。本文研究了澳大利亚管理塑料废物的措施,重点是如何支持和忍受特定的政策工具,以及如何更加关注全方位的政策工具——基于市场的、监管的和自愿的——可以产生更有效的解决方案。选择有效的政策工具对于解决可持续性问题至关重要。澳大利亚政府用于管理塑料废物的政策工具一直无效。此外,政策设置不支持关键利益相关者之间在减少塑料污染方面的有效协调。政策顾问应该认识到自愿方法和市场机制的局限性,并考虑引入明确和强制性的途径来实现政策目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信