A29 Simulation Integration: A Multispecialty Programme Embedding Simulation within Departmental Teaching Programmes in two Cardiothoracic Centres

Alasdair Frater, Dominic Lowcock
{"title":"A29 Simulation Integration: A Multispecialty Programme Embedding Simulation within Departmental Teaching Programmes in two Cardiothoracic Centres","authors":"Alasdair Frater, Dominic Lowcock","doi":"10.54531/shsu1468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UK-based doctors in training have faced major disruption, loss of training opportunities and increased risk of burnout due to covid-19 [1,2]. Furthermore, the intensified post-covid strain on services continues to hamper efforts to restore training. A bottom-up review across departments at both of our sites revealed demand across specialties and grades for increased simulated training opportunities. Further highlighting the need for additional simulation programmes, simulated training has recently been demonstrated to reduce risk of burnout [3]. To restore lost learning opportunities, improve morale and promote team cohesion, we began a project to embed simulated training at a departmental level. A key aim of this project was to give departments ownership of their simulation programmes, to promote autonomy, tutor upskilling and sustainability. We systematically reviewed the curricula for all specialties with doctors-in-training across our two sites in order to establish how training needs could be met with simulation. Consultant ‘simulation lead’ positions were offered to consultants in each department. Following this, we met with each assigned simulation lead to perform a scoping exercise - thus establishing specific training needs and opportunities within each department. The medical education team used this information to support each department to develop its own simulated training programme and support its delivery. Crucially, unlike many simulated training opportunities, our programme is not tied to a particular training scheme nor does it incur any fees. This allows equal access to the programme for both locally employed doctors and Health Education England trainees. We worked with 13 departments in developing simulation-based training programmes. Eight departments had a single lead identified, three shared lead positions and in two departments no consultants assumed the position of lead. Experience and enthusiasm varied by department. In departments where a simulation lead was not identified, the education department has supported other team members such as Clinical Nurse Specialists and specialty registrars to devise and deliver sim-based training. Anonymized Microsoft Forms based post-course questionnaire responses completed by 42 participants to date have been overwhelmingly positive (outlined in Percentage of attendees rating the following areas as ‘agree’ or ‘strongly agree’ Our scheme has led to embedding of effective simulated training programmes across specialties at our sites, leading to sustainably improved training opportunities for post graduate doctors in the post covid era. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/shsu1468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

UK-based doctors in training have faced major disruption, loss of training opportunities and increased risk of burnout due to covid-19 [1,2]. Furthermore, the intensified post-covid strain on services continues to hamper efforts to restore training. A bottom-up review across departments at both of our sites revealed demand across specialties and grades for increased simulated training opportunities. Further highlighting the need for additional simulation programmes, simulated training has recently been demonstrated to reduce risk of burnout [3]. To restore lost learning opportunities, improve morale and promote team cohesion, we began a project to embed simulated training at a departmental level. A key aim of this project was to give departments ownership of their simulation programmes, to promote autonomy, tutor upskilling and sustainability. We systematically reviewed the curricula for all specialties with doctors-in-training across our two sites in order to establish how training needs could be met with simulation. Consultant ‘simulation lead’ positions were offered to consultants in each department. Following this, we met with each assigned simulation lead to perform a scoping exercise - thus establishing specific training needs and opportunities within each department. The medical education team used this information to support each department to develop its own simulated training programme and support its delivery. Crucially, unlike many simulated training opportunities, our programme is not tied to a particular training scheme nor does it incur any fees. This allows equal access to the programme for both locally employed doctors and Health Education England trainees. We worked with 13 departments in developing simulation-based training programmes. Eight departments had a single lead identified, three shared lead positions and in two departments no consultants assumed the position of lead. Experience and enthusiasm varied by department. In departments where a simulation lead was not identified, the education department has supported other team members such as Clinical Nurse Specialists and specialty registrars to devise and deliver sim-based training. Anonymized Microsoft Forms based post-course questionnaire responses completed by 42 participants to date have been overwhelmingly positive (outlined in Percentage of attendees rating the following areas as ‘agree’ or ‘strongly agree’ Our scheme has led to embedding of effective simulated training programmes across specialties at our sites, leading to sustainably improved training opportunities for post graduate doctors in the post covid era. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
A29模拟集成:在两个心胸中心的部门教学计划中嵌入模拟的多专业计划
由于covid-19,英国的培训医生面临着严重的中断、培训机会的丧失和倦怠风险的增加[1,2]。此外,covid - 19后服务部门的压力加剧,继续阻碍恢复培训的努力。在我们两个基地的部门之间进行的自下而上的审查显示,不同专业和年级对增加模拟培训机会的需求。最近的研究表明,模拟训练可以降低职业倦怠的风险,这进一步强调了对额外模拟程序的需求[3]。为了恢复失去的学习机会,提高士气和促进团队凝聚力,我们开始了一个在部门层面嵌入模拟训练的项目。该项目的一个关键目标是让各部门拥有自己的模拟项目,促进自主权,指导技能提升和可持续性。我们系统地审查了两个地点所有有实习医生的专业课程,以确定如何通过模拟来满足培训需求。顾问“模拟领导”的职位被提供给每个部门的顾问。在此之后,我们与每个指定的模拟主管会面,进行范围界定,从而在每个部门建立具体的培训需求和机会。医学教育小组利用这些信息支持每个部门制定自己的模拟培训方案并支持其实施。最关键的是,与许多模拟培训机会不同,我们的课程不与特定的培训计划挂钩,也不收取任何费用。这使得当地雇用的医生和英格兰健康教育培训生都有平等机会参加该方案。我们与13个部门合作开发模拟培训课程。8个部门确定了一个领导,3个部门共同担任领导职务,2个部门没有顾问担任领导职务。经验和热情因部门而异。在没有确定模拟领导的部门,教育部门支持其他团队成员,如临床护士专家和专业注册员,设计和提供基于模拟的培训。迄今为止,42名参与者完成了基于匿名微软表单的课程后问卷调查,结果非常积极(以参与者将以下方面评价为“同意”或“非常同意”的百分比列出)。我们的计划导致在我们的站点嵌入有效的跨专业模拟培训计划,从而在后covid时代持续改善研究生博士的培训机会。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信