A18 Barriers and facilitators to the use of healthcare simulation to support the professional development of healthcare professionals: a systematic review of qualitative research.

Caroline Richardson, Caoimhe Madden, Dara Byrne, Sinead Lydon, Paul O’Connor
{"title":"A18 Barriers and facilitators to the use of healthcare simulation to support the professional development of healthcare professionals: a systematic review of qualitative research.","authors":"Caroline Richardson, Caoimhe Madden, Dara Byrne, Sinead Lydon, Paul O’Connor","doi":"10.54531/ebai6237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effectiveness of simulation-based education (SBE) in improving healthcare education among practising healthcare professionals (HCPs) is well recognized [1–3]. However, there is limited research available that explores the facilitators and barriers to the use of these activities amongst this population. The aim of this study was to determine those barriers and facilitators that exist to the use of healthcare simulation amongst practising HCPs through the systematic review of existing qualitative literature. Searches were performed using Medline and CINAHL from February to May 2022 with an updated search performed in June 2022. Reference list searches of included studies were also conducted. English-language, peer-reviewed studies that used qualitative methodology to examine barriers and/or facilitators to the use of SBE activities amongst HCPs practising in a hospital setting were included. Data were extracted and a quality appraisal tool was applied by the primary author, with 30% of included studies independently extracted and appraised by a second author to examine the agreement. Barriers and facilitators were coded inductively using thematic analysis. Thirteen studies were included out of a total of 2109 screened. Four main themes related to facilitators and barriers were identified: (1) management and leadership; (2) resources; (3) perceived impact and (4) learning experience (see Thematic analysis of facilitators and barriers to the use and uptake of SBE activities This study identified common barriers and facilitators to the use of SBE activities. By anticipating and addressing these adequately, the use and uptake of SBE activities amongst practising HCPs can be further enhanced. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"34 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/ebai6237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectiveness of simulation-based education (SBE) in improving healthcare education among practising healthcare professionals (HCPs) is well recognized [1–3]. However, there is limited research available that explores the facilitators and barriers to the use of these activities amongst this population. The aim of this study was to determine those barriers and facilitators that exist to the use of healthcare simulation amongst practising HCPs through the systematic review of existing qualitative literature. Searches were performed using Medline and CINAHL from February to May 2022 with an updated search performed in June 2022. Reference list searches of included studies were also conducted. English-language, peer-reviewed studies that used qualitative methodology to examine barriers and/or facilitators to the use of SBE activities amongst HCPs practising in a hospital setting were included. Data were extracted and a quality appraisal tool was applied by the primary author, with 30% of included studies independently extracted and appraised by a second author to examine the agreement. Barriers and facilitators were coded inductively using thematic analysis. Thirteen studies were included out of a total of 2109 screened. Four main themes related to facilitators and barriers were identified: (1) management and leadership; (2) resources; (3) perceived impact and (4) learning experience (see Thematic analysis of facilitators and barriers to the use and uptake of SBE activities This study identified common barriers and facilitators to the use of SBE activities. By anticipating and addressing these adequately, the use and uptake of SBE activities amongst practising HCPs can be further enhanced. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
A18使用医疗保健模拟来支持医疗保健专业人员专业发展的障碍和促进因素:对定性研究的系统回顾。
模拟基础教育(SBE)在改善执业医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的医疗保健教育方面的有效性得到了广泛认可[1-3]。然而,现有的研究有限,探讨了在这一人群中使用这些活动的促进因素和障碍。本研究的目的是通过对现有定性文献的系统回顾,确定在执业医务人员中使用医疗保健模拟存在的障碍和促进因素。在2022年2月至5月期间使用Medline和CINAHL进行了搜索,并在2022年6月进行了更新搜索。还进行了纳入研究的参考文献检索。纳入了使用定性方法检查在医院执业的医护人员中使用SBE活动的障碍和/或促进因素的英文同行评议研究。第一作者提取数据并使用质量评估工具,其中30%的纳入研究由第二作者独立提取和评估,以检查一致性。使用主题分析对障碍和促进因素进行归纳编码。总共筛选了2109项研究,其中13项被纳入。确定了与促进因素和障碍相关的四个主题:(1)管理和领导;(2)资源;(3)感知影响和(4)学习经验(参见对使用和吸收SBE活动的促进因素和障碍的专题分析)本研究确定了使用SBE活动的常见障碍和促进因素。通过充分预测和解决这些问题,执业医务人员对SBE活动的使用和吸收可以进一步加强。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信