Evaluating the impact of flexible offices in coping with the uncertainty on future demand

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Claudio Martani, Noemi Fiorot, Andrea González, Bryan T Adey, Joris Van Wezemael
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of flexible offices in coping with the uncertainty on future demand","authors":"Claudio Martani, Noemi Fiorot, Andrea González, Bryan T Adey, Joris Van Wezemael","doi":"10.1680/jinam.23.00027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential growth in home-office working poses a large uncertainty on the future demand for office space. Flexible offices can help limit the negative effect of this uncertainty by allowing future changes of use. To ensure that the investment in flexibility is proportioned to the risk it minimizes, the real options methodology is used in this work for modelling the uncertainty of future demand for office space and estimating its effect on stakeholders in the long-term. The methodology is tested on an example multi-story mixed-tenants office building in Zurich for which ten designs are proposed and the triggering logic modelled. The designs have various degrees of flexibility and the triggering logic mimic the decision criteria of an owner. The results show that, under the investigated circumstances, a flexible design with movable walls to enable a periodic conversion of the unrented office space into co-working spaces, and with parceled technical elements to allow the conversion of long unrented office space into residential units, is the optimal decision for all involved stakeholders over the building’s life. The authors draw conclusions about strengths and limitations of the real options methodology in this context and envision future developments.","PeriodicalId":43387,"journal":{"name":"Infrastructure Asset Management","volume":"3 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infrastructure Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.23.00027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential growth in home-office working poses a large uncertainty on the future demand for office space. Flexible offices can help limit the negative effect of this uncertainty by allowing future changes of use. To ensure that the investment in flexibility is proportioned to the risk it minimizes, the real options methodology is used in this work for modelling the uncertainty of future demand for office space and estimating its effect on stakeholders in the long-term. The methodology is tested on an example multi-story mixed-tenants office building in Zurich for which ten designs are proposed and the triggering logic modelled. The designs have various degrees of flexibility and the triggering logic mimic the decision criteria of an owner. The results show that, under the investigated circumstances, a flexible design with movable walls to enable a periodic conversion of the unrented office space into co-working spaces, and with parceled technical elements to allow the conversion of long unrented office space into residential units, is the optimal decision for all involved stakeholders over the building’s life. The authors draw conclusions about strengths and limitations of the real options methodology in this context and envision future developments.
评估灵活办公对应对未来需求不确定性的影响
家庭办公的潜在增长给未来的办公空间需求带来了很大的不确定性。灵活的办公室可以通过允许未来的使用变化来帮助限制这种不确定性的负面影响。为了确保灵活性的投资与风险最小化成比例,本工作中使用实物期权方法对未来办公空间需求的不确定性进行建模,并估计其对利益相关者的长期影响。该方法在苏黎世的一个多层混合租户办公楼中进行了测试,该办公楼提出了十种设计方案,并对触发逻辑进行了建模。该设计具有不同程度的灵活性,触发逻辑模拟了所有者的决策标准。结果表明,在调查的情况下,灵活的设计,可移动的墙壁,使未租用的办公空间定期转换为共同工作空间,并通过技术元素的包装,使长期未租用的办公空间转换为住宅单元,是建筑物生命周期中所有相关利益相关者的最佳决策。在此背景下,作者总结了实物期权方法论的优势和局限性,并展望了未来的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信