Thixotropy, antithixotropy, and viscoelasticity in hysteresis

IF 3 2区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS
Yilin Wang, Randy H. Ewoldt
{"title":"Thixotropy, antithixotropy, and viscoelasticity in hysteresis","authors":"Yilin Wang, Randy H. Ewoldt","doi":"10.1122/8.0000620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thixotropy, antithixotropy, and viscoelasticity are three types of time-dependent dynamics that involve fundamentally different underlying physical processes. Here, we show that the three dynamics exhibit different signatures in hysteresis by examining the fingerprints of the simplest thixotropic kinetic model, a new antithixotropic model that we introduce here, and the Giesekus model. We start by showing that a consistent protocol to generate hysteresis loops is a discrete shear-rate controlled ramp that begins and ends at high shear rates, rather than at low shear rates. Using this protocol, we identify two distinguishing features in the resulting stress versus shear rate loops. The first is the direction of the hysteresis loops: clockwise for thixotropy, but counterclockwise for viscoelasticity and antithixotropy. A second feature is achieved at high ramping rates where all responses lose hysteresis: the viscoelastic response shows a stress plateau at low shear rates due to lack of stress relaxation, whereas the thixotropic and antithixotropic responses are purely viscous with minimal shear thinning or thickening. We establish further evidence for these signatures by experimentally measuring the hysteresis of Laponite suspensions, carbon black suspensions, and poly(ethylene oxide) solutions, each representing a historically accepted example of each class of material behavior. The signatures measured in experiments are consistent with those predicted by the three models. This study reveals different fingerprints in hysteresis loops associated with thixotropy, antithixotropy, and viscoelasticity, which may be helpful in distinguishing the three time-dependent responses.","PeriodicalId":16991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheology","volume":"23 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1122/8.0000620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thixotropy, antithixotropy, and viscoelasticity are three types of time-dependent dynamics that involve fundamentally different underlying physical processes. Here, we show that the three dynamics exhibit different signatures in hysteresis by examining the fingerprints of the simplest thixotropic kinetic model, a new antithixotropic model that we introduce here, and the Giesekus model. We start by showing that a consistent protocol to generate hysteresis loops is a discrete shear-rate controlled ramp that begins and ends at high shear rates, rather than at low shear rates. Using this protocol, we identify two distinguishing features in the resulting stress versus shear rate loops. The first is the direction of the hysteresis loops: clockwise for thixotropy, but counterclockwise for viscoelasticity and antithixotropy. A second feature is achieved at high ramping rates where all responses lose hysteresis: the viscoelastic response shows a stress plateau at low shear rates due to lack of stress relaxation, whereas the thixotropic and antithixotropic responses are purely viscous with minimal shear thinning or thickening. We establish further evidence for these signatures by experimentally measuring the hysteresis of Laponite suspensions, carbon black suspensions, and poly(ethylene oxide) solutions, each representing a historically accepted example of each class of material behavior. The signatures measured in experiments are consistent with those predicted by the three models. This study reveals different fingerprints in hysteresis loops associated with thixotropy, antithixotropy, and viscoelasticity, which may be helpful in distinguishing the three time-dependent responses.
触变性、反触变性和滞回中的粘弹性
触变性、反触变性和粘弹性是三种类型的时间相关动力学,涉及根本不同的潜在物理过程。在这里,我们通过检查最简单的触变动力学模型、我们在这里引入的新的反触变模型和Giesekus模型的指纹,表明三种动力学在滞后中表现出不同的特征。我们首先表明,产生迟滞回路的一致协议是一个离散的剪切速率控制斜坡,开始和结束于高剪切速率,而不是在低剪切速率。使用该方案,我们确定了应力与剪切速率循环的两个显著特征。首先是迟滞环的方向:触变性为顺时针方向,但粘弹性和反触变性为逆时针方向。第二个特征是在高斜坡速率下,所有响应都失去了滞后:粘弹性响应在低剪切速率下由于缺乏应力松弛而显示应力平台,而触变和反触变响应则是纯粘性的,具有最小的剪切变薄或增厚。我们通过实验测量拉脱石悬浮液、炭黑悬浮液和聚环氧乙烷溶液的滞后性,为这些特征建立了进一步的证据,每种溶液都代表了历史上公认的每种材料行为的例子。实验测量的特征与三种模型预测的特征一致。本研究揭示了触变性、反触变性和粘弹性在迟滞回路中的不同指纹图谱,这可能有助于区分三种时变响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rheology
Journal of Rheology 物理-力学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
100
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheology, formerly the Transactions of The Society of Rheology, is published six times per year by The Society of Rheology, a member society of the American Institute of Physics, through AIP Publishing. It provides in-depth interdisciplinary coverage of theoretical and experimental issues drawn from industry and academia. The Journal of Rheology is published for professionals and students in chemistry, physics, engineering, material science, and mathematics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信