A21 The use of simulated learning in prequalifying physiotherapy education: a scoping review

Jonathan Room, Robyn Stiger
{"title":"A21 The use of simulated learning in prequalifying physiotherapy education: a scoping review","authors":"Jonathan Room, Robyn Stiger","doi":"10.54531/hvpn9537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simulation-based learning is an increasingly popular pedagogical approach. In some areas of physiotherapy, it is better been documented, for example, cardiorespiratory physiotherapy [1]. However, its use in other physiotherapy-related settings is less clear. Therefore, the aim of this project was to review the literature on simulation-based learning in prequalifying physiotherapy education, in order to explore where studies have taken place, which physiotherapy settings it is used in and indication of its effectiveness in teaching. This study was carried out based on the scoping review methodology outlined by Arksey and O’Malley [2]. The following databases were searched: AMED, BNI, CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, HMIC, Medline and PsychInfo, using specific search terms, to find studies involving the use of simulation in a prequalifying physiotherapy setting. Returned papers were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers. The database search results were recorded and managed using Rayyan™ [3]. The database search retrieved 280 papers. Following the removal of duplicates, screening titles and abstracts and then screening full-text papers, 39 papers were included. The included studies were conducted in USA ( This scoping review identified a growing body of evidence supporting simulation-based learning in prequalifying physiotherapy education. However, to date, its use in pedagogical research has tended to focus on the cardiorespiratory setting, and it has often been researched as a tool to explore or enhance interprofessional collaboration. Whilst both of these areas are of value to the profession, there is scope to explore the use of simulation-based learning in settings such as musculoskeletal teaching. Further work on its use and value in the teaching of discrete complex tasks, in addition to collaborative practice, such as team working, de-escalation and communication is also needed. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"1 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/hvpn9537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulation-based learning is an increasingly popular pedagogical approach. In some areas of physiotherapy, it is better been documented, for example, cardiorespiratory physiotherapy [1]. However, its use in other physiotherapy-related settings is less clear. Therefore, the aim of this project was to review the literature on simulation-based learning in prequalifying physiotherapy education, in order to explore where studies have taken place, which physiotherapy settings it is used in and indication of its effectiveness in teaching. This study was carried out based on the scoping review methodology outlined by Arksey and O’Malley [2]. The following databases were searched: AMED, BNI, CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, HMIC, Medline and PsychInfo, using specific search terms, to find studies involving the use of simulation in a prequalifying physiotherapy setting. Returned papers were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers. The database search results were recorded and managed using Rayyan™ [3]. The database search retrieved 280 papers. Following the removal of duplicates, screening titles and abstracts and then screening full-text papers, 39 papers were included. The included studies were conducted in USA ( This scoping review identified a growing body of evidence supporting simulation-based learning in prequalifying physiotherapy education. However, to date, its use in pedagogical research has tended to focus on the cardiorespiratory setting, and it has often been researched as a tool to explore or enhance interprofessional collaboration. Whilst both of these areas are of value to the profession, there is scope to explore the use of simulation-based learning in settings such as musculoskeletal teaching. Further work on its use and value in the teaching of discrete complex tasks, in addition to collaborative practice, such as team working, de-escalation and communication is also needed. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
模拟学习在资格预审物理治疗教育中的应用:范围综述
基于模拟的学习是一种日益流行的教学方法。在一些物理治疗领域,它得到了更好的记录,例如心肺物理治疗[1]。然而,它在其他物理治疗相关环境中的应用尚不清楚。因此,本项目的目的是回顾关于预审资格物理治疗教育中基于模拟的学习的文献,以探索在哪里进行了研究,在哪些物理治疗环境中使用了模拟学习,以及它在教学中的有效性。本研究基于Arksey和O 'Malley[2]概述的范围审查方法进行。使用特定检索词检索以下数据库:AMED, BNI, CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, HMIC, Medline和PsychInfo,以查找在资格预审物理治疗设置中使用模拟的研究。退回的论文由两名审稿人按照纳入和排除标准进行筛选。使用Rayyan™记录和管理数据库搜索结果[3]。数据库检索检索到280篇论文。在删除重复、筛选标题和摘要,然后筛选全文论文后,纳入了39篇论文。纳入的研究是在美国进行的(这一范围审查确定了越来越多的证据支持在资格预审物理治疗教育中基于模拟的学习。然而,到目前为止,它在教学研究中的应用往往侧重于心肺环境,并且经常被研究作为探索或加强专业间合作的工具。虽然这两个领域都对专业有价值,但在肌肉骨骼教学等环境中探索基于模拟的学习的使用是有余地的。除了协作实践(如团队合作、降级和沟通)之外,还需要进一步研究其在离散复杂任务教学中的使用和价值。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信