A novel model for multi-risk ranking of buildings at city level based on open data: the test site of Rome, Italy

IF 4.5 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Giandomenico Mastrantoni, Claudia Masciulli, Roberta Marini, Carlo Esposito, Gabriele Scarascia Mugnozza, Paolo Mazzanti
{"title":"A novel model for multi-risk ranking of buildings at city level based on open data: the test site of Rome, Italy","authors":"Giandomenico Mastrantoni, Claudia Masciulli, Roberta Marini, Carlo Esposito, Gabriele Scarascia Mugnozza, Paolo Mazzanti","doi":"10.1080/19475705.2023.2275541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of population concentration in large cities, assessing the risks posed by geological hazards to enhance urban resilience is becoming increasingly important. This study introduces a robust and replicable procedure for assessing ground instability hazards and associated physical risks. Specifically, our comprehensive model integrates spatial hazard assessments, multi-satellite InSAR data, and physical features of the built environment to rank and prioritize assets facing multiple risks, with a focus on ground instabilities. The model generates risk scores based on hazard probability, potential damage, and displacement rates, aiding decision-makers in identifying high-risk buildings and implementing appropriate mitigation measures to reduce economic losses. The procedure was tested in Rome, Italy, where the analysis revealed that 60% of the examined buildings (90 × 103) are at risk of ground instability. Specifically, 33%, 22%, and 5% exhibit the highest multi-risk score for sinkholes, landslides, and subsidence, respectively. Landslide risk prevails among residential structures, while retail and office buildings face a higher risk of subsidence and sinkholes. Notably, our study identified a positive correlation between mitigation expenses and the multi-risk scores of nearby buildings, highlighting the practical implications of our findings for urban planning and risk management strategies.","PeriodicalId":51283,"journal":{"name":"Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2275541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of population concentration in large cities, assessing the risks posed by geological hazards to enhance urban resilience is becoming increasingly important. This study introduces a robust and replicable procedure for assessing ground instability hazards and associated physical risks. Specifically, our comprehensive model integrates spatial hazard assessments, multi-satellite InSAR data, and physical features of the built environment to rank and prioritize assets facing multiple risks, with a focus on ground instabilities. The model generates risk scores based on hazard probability, potential damage, and displacement rates, aiding decision-makers in identifying high-risk buildings and implementing appropriate mitigation measures to reduce economic losses. The procedure was tested in Rome, Italy, where the analysis revealed that 60% of the examined buildings (90 × 103) are at risk of ground instability. Specifically, 33%, 22%, and 5% exhibit the highest multi-risk score for sinkholes, landslides, and subsidence, respectively. Landslide risk prevails among residential structures, while retail and office buildings face a higher risk of subsidence and sinkholes. Notably, our study identified a positive correlation between mitigation expenses and the multi-risk scores of nearby buildings, highlighting the practical implications of our findings for urban planning and risk management strategies.
基于开放数据的城市级建筑多风险排序新模型:意大利罗马试验场
在大城市人口集中的背景下,评估地质灾害带来的风险以增强城市抵御能力变得越来越重要。本研究介绍了一种可靠且可复制的程序,用于评估地面不稳定危害和相关的物理风险。具体来说,我们的综合模型集成了空间危害评估、多卫星InSAR数据和建筑环境的物理特征,对面临多种风险的资产进行排名和优先排序,重点是地面不稳定性。该模型根据危害概率、潜在损害和流离失所率生成风险评分,帮助决策者识别高风险建筑物并实施适当的缓解措施,以减少经济损失。该程序在意大利罗马进行了测试,分析显示,60%的被检查建筑物(90 × 103)有地面不稳定的风险。具体来说,33%、22%和5%的人分别在天坑、滑坡和下沉方面表现出最高的多重风险评分。滑坡风险在住宅建筑中普遍存在,而零售和办公建筑面临更高的下沉和天坑风险。值得注意的是,我们的研究确定了缓解费用与附近建筑物的多重风险评分之间的正相关关系,突出了我们的研究结果对城市规划和风险管理策略的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk
Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk is to address new concepts, approaches and case studies using geospatial and remote sensing techniques to study monitoring, mapping, risk mitigation, risk vulnerability and early warning of natural hazards. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk covers the following topics: - Remote sensing techniques - Natural hazards associated with land, ocean, atmosphere, land-ocean-atmosphere coupling and climate change - Emerging problems related to multi-hazard risk assessment, multi-vulnerability risk assessment, risk quantification and the economic aspects of hazards. - Results of findings on major natural hazards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信