Contents of the concept of intellectual property in the constitutional section: the experience of foreign countries

Oleksandr Shtyrov
{"title":"Contents of the concept of intellectual property in the constitutional section: the experience of foreign countries","authors":"Oleksandr Shtyrov","doi":"10.34132/pard2023.21.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines modern trends in the constitutional and legal protection of intellectual property with the help of a comparative analysis of the development of the legal institution of intellectual property. It is concluded that the need to ensure the rights of citizens, national security, and the creation of an innovative economy determine the directions of world constitutional development, one of which is the constitutionalization of the legal institute of intellectual property. There are two main methods of constitutionalization: legislative and interpretive.
 The subjective constitutional right to intellectual property performs a special \"social function\", which consists in ensuring an optimal balance between private and public interests.
 Constitutionalization is a global trend in the modern development of states and is expressed in the universalization and intensification of the influence of constitutional values on the institutions of different legal systems, which significantly contributes to their convergence. The conclusion that intellectual property is part of the basic constitutional principles of many foreign states. Therefore, among the foundations of the constitutional system, a new principle related to the development of intellectual property relations should be highlighted, including their stimulation, encouragement, guarantee and support in order to achieve economic and social progress of society aimed at building an innovative (based on the knowledge economy) state.
 Objectively existing differences between states in the tasks of constitutional regulation, the level of development of intellectual property relations and the degree of their regulation in the current legislation, in the observance of the traditions of constitutional regulation and the propensity of the constitutional legislator to include modern novelties from the constitutions of other countries give rise to new approaches to the constitutional regulation of intellectual property relations, and also entail the emergence of «mixed» models. All this makes the issue of constitutional regulation of intellectual property rights an interesting and promising object of scientific research.","PeriodicalId":33637,"journal":{"name":"Publichne upravlinnia ta regional''nii rozvitok","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publichne upravlinnia ta regional''nii rozvitok","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2023.21.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines modern trends in the constitutional and legal protection of intellectual property with the help of a comparative analysis of the development of the legal institution of intellectual property. It is concluded that the need to ensure the rights of citizens, national security, and the creation of an innovative economy determine the directions of world constitutional development, one of which is the constitutionalization of the legal institute of intellectual property. There are two main methods of constitutionalization: legislative and interpretive. The subjective constitutional right to intellectual property performs a special "social function", which consists in ensuring an optimal balance between private and public interests. Constitutionalization is a global trend in the modern development of states and is expressed in the universalization and intensification of the influence of constitutional values on the institutions of different legal systems, which significantly contributes to their convergence. The conclusion that intellectual property is part of the basic constitutional principles of many foreign states. Therefore, among the foundations of the constitutional system, a new principle related to the development of intellectual property relations should be highlighted, including their stimulation, encouragement, guarantee and support in order to achieve economic and social progress of society aimed at building an innovative (based on the knowledge economy) state. Objectively existing differences between states in the tasks of constitutional regulation, the level of development of intellectual property relations and the degree of their regulation in the current legislation, in the observance of the traditions of constitutional regulation and the propensity of the constitutional legislator to include modern novelties from the constitutions of other countries give rise to new approaches to the constitutional regulation of intellectual property relations, and also entail the emergence of «mixed» models. All this makes the issue of constitutional regulation of intellectual property rights an interesting and promising object of scientific research.
宪法部分知识产权概念的内容:国外的经验
本文通过对知识产权法律制度发展的比较分析,考察了知识产权宪法和法律保护的现代趋势。结论是,保障公民权利、国家安全和创造创新经济的需要决定了世界宪法发展的方向,其中之一是知识产权法律制度的宪法化。宪法化主要有两种方式:立法方式和解释方式。知识产权的主观宪法权利具有一种特殊的“社会功能”,即确保私人利益与公共利益之间的最佳平衡。宪法化是现代国家发展的全球性趋势,表现为宪法价值对不同法系制度的影响的普遍化和强化,这对它们的趋同起着重要作用。结论是知识产权是许多国家基本宪法原则的一部分。因此,在宪法体系的基础中,应突出一项与知识产权关系发展有关的新原则,包括对知识产权关系的激励、鼓励、保障和支持,以实现以建设创新型(基于知识经济的)国家为目标的社会经济和社会进步。 各国在宪法规制的任务、知识产权关系的发展水平及其在现行立法中的规制程度、对宪法规制传统的遵守以及宪法立法者对其他国家现代宪法的新颖性的倾向等方面客观存在的差异,产生了知识产权关系宪法规制的新途径。同时也导致了“混合”模式的出现。所有这些都使知识产权的宪法规制问题成为一个有趣而有前途的科学研究对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信