Differences in digital prenatal service utilization by self‐reported race

Alex Peahl, Hannah R. Jahnke, Lily Rubin‐Miller, Natalie Henrich, Neel Shah
{"title":"Differences in digital prenatal service utilization by self‐reported race","authors":"Alex Peahl, Hannah R. Jahnke, Lily Rubin‐Miller, Natalie Henrich, Neel Shah","doi":"10.1002/rfc2.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to understand the use of supplemental digital prenatal services by race and ethnicity among pregnant people utilizing a comprehensive, employer‐sponsored digital health platform. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant people enrolled in a comprehensive, employer‐sponsored digital health platform, assessing utilization of app‐based supplemental digital prenatal services by race and ethnicity. Care utilization included three categories: asynchronous utilization (e.g., article reads, videos); interactions with a care advocate, a trained care navigator; and provider interactions (e.g., messages and visits with a medical provider). Differences in service utilization by race and ethnicity were assessed using basic descriptive statistics with between‐group comparisons. Results Of 5662 users, 2362 (41.7%) were White, 266 (4.7%) were Black, and 1411 (24.9%) reported ‘prefer not to say’ for their race. More Black and Asian users sent messages to a provider and had provider appointments than White and Hispanic users (messages: White: 33.7%, Hispanic: 33.6%, Asian: 44.9%, Black: 45.1%, p < 0.001; provider appointments: White: 49.8%, Hispanic: 43.3%, Asian: 52.4%, Black: 46.2%, p < 0.001). More Black users accessed doula and mental health appointments than other racial groups. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that pregnant people of historically marginalized groups use digital supplemental prenatal services as much or more than White patients. Digital prenatal services may be a promising avenue for improving care access and experience for patient groups that face the biggest barriers to care and worst maternity care outcomes.","PeriodicalId":74669,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive, female and child health","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive, female and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rfc2.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to understand the use of supplemental digital prenatal services by race and ethnicity among pregnant people utilizing a comprehensive, employer‐sponsored digital health platform. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant people enrolled in a comprehensive, employer‐sponsored digital health platform, assessing utilization of app‐based supplemental digital prenatal services by race and ethnicity. Care utilization included three categories: asynchronous utilization (e.g., article reads, videos); interactions with a care advocate, a trained care navigator; and provider interactions (e.g., messages and visits with a medical provider). Differences in service utilization by race and ethnicity were assessed using basic descriptive statistics with between‐group comparisons. Results Of 5662 users, 2362 (41.7%) were White, 266 (4.7%) were Black, and 1411 (24.9%) reported ‘prefer not to say’ for their race. More Black and Asian users sent messages to a provider and had provider appointments than White and Hispanic users (messages: White: 33.7%, Hispanic: 33.6%, Asian: 44.9%, Black: 45.1%, p < 0.001; provider appointments: White: 49.8%, Hispanic: 43.3%, Asian: 52.4%, Black: 46.2%, p < 0.001). More Black users accessed doula and mental health appointments than other racial groups. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that pregnant people of historically marginalized groups use digital supplemental prenatal services as much or more than White patients. Digital prenatal services may be a promising avenue for improving care access and experience for patient groups that face the biggest barriers to care and worst maternity care outcomes.
自我报告种族在数字产前服务利用方面的差异
摘要目的本研究的目的是利用一个全面的、雇主赞助的数字健康平台,了解孕妇中不同种族和民族对补充数字产前服务的使用情况。材料和方法我们对在雇主赞助的综合性数字健康平台注册的孕妇进行了一项回顾性队列研究,按种族和民族评估基于应用程序的补充数字产前服务的使用情况。护理利用包括三类:异步利用(例如,文章阅读、视频);与护理倡导者,训练有素的护理导航员进行互动;提供者互动(例如,与医疗提供者的信息和访问)。使用基本描述性统计和组间比较来评估不同种族和民族的服务利用差异。结果在5662名用户中,2362名(41.7%)是白人,266名(4.7%)是黑人,1411名(24.9%)表示“不喜欢说”自己的种族。与白人和西班牙裔用户相比,黑人和亚洲用户向提供者发送信息并预约提供者的数量更多(信息:白人:33.7%,西班牙裔:33.6%,亚洲人:44.9%,黑人:45.1%,p <0.001;医生预约:白人:49.8%,西班牙裔:43.3%,亚裔:52.4%,黑人:46.2%,p <0.001)。与其他种族群体相比,更多的黑人用户接受了助产师和心理健康预约。我们的研究表明,历史上边缘化群体的孕妇使用数字辅助产前服务的数量与白人患者一样多,甚至更多。数字产前服务可能是一个有希望的途径,可以改善面临最大护理障碍和最差产科护理结果的患者群体的护理机会和体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信