{"title":"The Korean “Human Rights Lens in Social Work” Scale Equips Social Workers to Promote Human Rights in Social Service Settings","authors":"Minhong Lee, Jane McPherson","doi":"10.1080/01488376.2023.2276135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study presents the validation of Korean version of the Human Rights Lens in Social Work (K-HRLSW) scale, a measure that can be used to foster the promotion of human rights in Korean social service settings. First, the English-language HRLSW was translated and adapted for Korean language and culture. Then, item analyses, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to verify the psychometric properties of the Korean-language scale. For cross-validity, a total of 401 social workers were randomly split into two groups (group 1 = 202; group 2 = 199) to conduct EFA and CFA on separate samples. The overall reliability of the measure was good (alpha= .796), and the reliability of the two subscales were satisfactory with .742 for “social problems as rights violations” and .795 for “clients as experiencing rights violations.” A CFA (n = 199) confirmed the overall fit of the revised model with the two factors. Thus, the K-HRLSW is a reliable and valid measure that researchers can employ to assess Korean social workers’ human rights-related competencies in practice and their ability to promote human rights in social service settings.Keywords: Human rights practicemeasurementscale validationsocial worksocial services for older adultsKorea Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Service Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Service Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2023.2276135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractThis study presents the validation of Korean version of the Human Rights Lens in Social Work (K-HRLSW) scale, a measure that can be used to foster the promotion of human rights in Korean social service settings. First, the English-language HRLSW was translated and adapted for Korean language and culture. Then, item analyses, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to verify the psychometric properties of the Korean-language scale. For cross-validity, a total of 401 social workers were randomly split into two groups (group 1 = 202; group 2 = 199) to conduct EFA and CFA on separate samples. The overall reliability of the measure was good (alpha= .796), and the reliability of the two subscales were satisfactory with .742 for “social problems as rights violations” and .795 for “clients as experiencing rights violations.” A CFA (n = 199) confirmed the overall fit of the revised model with the two factors. Thus, the K-HRLSW is a reliable and valid measure that researchers can employ to assess Korean social workers’ human rights-related competencies in practice and their ability to promote human rights in social service settings.Keywords: Human rights practicemeasurementscale validationsocial worksocial services for older adultsKorea Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Social Service Research is exclusively devoted to empirical research and its application to the design, delivery, and management of the new social services. The Journal focuses on outcomes-based research and practice, and clearly presents the different types of funded and non-funded state-of-the-art research being carried out in the field. Each issue effectively highlights both the quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Contributors from the national and international social service arenas provide an important and critical basis for management and policy decisions in a wide variety of social service settings.