Maize farmers’ use, preference, and trustworthiness of information sources and communication channels in Dormaa, Ghana: A gender comparison.

Namah Taku-Forchu, Shuyang Qu, Misty D Lambert, Michael S. Retallick, Jonathan D Ulmer, George P. Opit
{"title":"Maize farmers’ use, preference, and trustworthiness of information sources and communication channels in Dormaa, Ghana: A gender comparison.","authors":"Namah Taku-Forchu, Shuyang Qu, Misty D Lambert, Michael S. Retallick, Jonathan D Ulmer, George P. Opit","doi":"10.4148/1051-0834.2479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to identify maize farmers' use, preference, and trustworthiness of the various information sources and communication channels farmers in Dormaa, Ghana, used to receive information about their farming activities. A questionnaire was developed, and data was collected from 217 maize farmers. The result revealed more males are involved in maize production than females. Most males indicated they received training in using hermetic bags more than female farmers. Respondents ranked Extension agents highest as the source from which they receive their farming information. Based on the level of preference for the information sources, the results show a statistically significant difference between male and female farmers' preference for Extension agents, friends/neighbors, and church leaders, with male farmers preferring these information sources more than females. The result indicated a significant difference between male and female preferences for phone calls, with more males indicating they preferred telephone calls. The t-test results of farmers’ trustworthiness for the information sources revealed a significant difference between male and female farmers’ trustworthiness for fellow farmers, friends/neighbors, telephone calls, and posters/billboards for communication channels. Given that Extension professionals are the most preferred and trustworthy source of information, we recommend that the government and stakeholders organize extension training programs to strengthen local extension. We recommend greater women involvement and given strategic roles in the planning and organization of training programs.","PeriodicalId":33763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Communications","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study aimed to identify maize farmers' use, preference, and trustworthiness of the various information sources and communication channels farmers in Dormaa, Ghana, used to receive information about their farming activities. A questionnaire was developed, and data was collected from 217 maize farmers. The result revealed more males are involved in maize production than females. Most males indicated they received training in using hermetic bags more than female farmers. Respondents ranked Extension agents highest as the source from which they receive their farming information. Based on the level of preference for the information sources, the results show a statistically significant difference between male and female farmers' preference for Extension agents, friends/neighbors, and church leaders, with male farmers preferring these information sources more than females. The result indicated a significant difference between male and female preferences for phone calls, with more males indicating they preferred telephone calls. The t-test results of farmers’ trustworthiness for the information sources revealed a significant difference between male and female farmers’ trustworthiness for fellow farmers, friends/neighbors, telephone calls, and posters/billboards for communication channels. Given that Extension professionals are the most preferred and trustworthy source of information, we recommend that the government and stakeholders organize extension training programs to strengthen local extension. We recommend greater women involvement and given strategic roles in the planning and organization of training programs.
加纳Dormaa玉米农民对信息来源和沟通渠道的使用、偏好和可信度:性别比较
该研究旨在确定加纳Dormaa的玉米农民对各种信息来源和沟通渠道的使用、偏好和可信度,这些信息来源和沟通渠道用于接收有关其农业活动的信息。编制了一份调查问卷,收集了217名玉米农民的数据。结果显示,参与玉米生产的雄性比雌性多。大多数男性表示,他们比女性农民更多地接受了使用密封袋的培训。受访者认为推广机构是他们获得农业信息的最高来源。从信息源的偏好程度来看,男性和女性农民对推广代理人、朋友/邻居和教会领袖的偏好差异有统计学意义,男性农民比女性农民更喜欢这些信息源。结果表明,男性和女性对打电话的偏好存在显著差异,更多的男性表示他们更喜欢打电话。农民对信息源可信度的t检验结果显示,男性和女性农民对同乡、朋友/邻居、电话和宣传海报/广告牌的可信度存在显著差异。鉴于推广专业人员是最受欢迎和最值得信赖的信息来源,我们建议政府和利益相关者组织推广培训计划,以加强地方推广。我们建议妇女更多地参与并在培训方案的规划和组织中发挥战略性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信