Regulatory transparency and citizen support for government decisions: evidence from nuclear power acceptance in China

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Juan Du, Xufeng Zhu
{"title":"Regulatory transparency and citizen support for government decisions: evidence from nuclear power acceptance in China","authors":"Juan Du, Xufeng Zhu","doi":"10.1080/1523908x.2023.2269381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study examines the effect of transparency as a governance mechanism on citizen support for controversial governmental decisions to public facilities. Building on the government transparency literature, this article argues that regulatory transparency has a double-sided meaning of regulatory enforcement and rule violations. Due to the ambiguity inherent in regulatory performance information, citizens may interpret disclosed information as a reflection of prevalent rule violations and thereby reduce support for relevant public facilities. Furthermore, the negative association between regulatory transparency and citizen support is contingent on citizens’ use of social media. We test these arguments in the nuclear energy regulatory domain using original, nationally representative survey data and an independent environmental regulation transparency index in China. Findings reveal that regulatory transparency reduces citizen support for proposed nuclear power programs. We also find that regulatory transparency is particularly influential for respondents with relatively higher levels of social media usage. These findings highlight the dilemma that governments face when they seek to enhance policy support through transparency in the digital age.KEYWORDS: Regulatory transparencycitizen supportgovernment decisionssocial medianuclear energy AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank anonymous reviewers for all the constructive and insightful comments.We are grafeful for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the paper from Jing Zhao, Hanzhang Liu, and Youlang Zhang. We extend our gratitude to scholars who provided feedback at conferences of AP-PPN, PMSA, and PMRC since 2018.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For more information on worldwide nuclear energy policies, see the website of the International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/news.2 See media report ‘Chinese Scramble to Buy Salt as Radiation Fears Grow’. CNN, March 18, 2011, http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/17/china.salt.scramble/index.html.3 See replies to the post ‘People in Fangchenggang oppose the construction of Bailong Nuclear Power Plant, please respect public opinion’, Hongdou Forum, May 4, 2022, https://hd3g.gxnews.com.cn/viewthread.php?t=17820210&.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 72304100 ]; Yangfan Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [grant number 23YF1410100], Chunhui Plan Cooperation and Research Project, Ministry of Education of China [grant number HZKY20220070]; The Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China: “Research on the reformation and innovation of national climate governance system towards carbon neutrality” [grant number 72140007].Notes on contributorsJuan DuJuan Du is an Associated Professor at School of Public Administration, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. Her research focuses on policy process, policy analysis and environmental policy. Her research has been published in Public Administration, The China Quarterly, Public Performance & Management Review, International Public Management Journal, among others.Xufeng ZhuXufeng Zhu is Professor and Dean at the School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, China. His major research interests in China studies are the policy process, think tanks, and public governance. He is the author of seven books in English or in Chinese. His recent publications include articles in Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Public Administration Review, Public Administration, Governance, Policy Studies Journal, Sustainable Development, and so on.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"42 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2023.2269381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study examines the effect of transparency as a governance mechanism on citizen support for controversial governmental decisions to public facilities. Building on the government transparency literature, this article argues that regulatory transparency has a double-sided meaning of regulatory enforcement and rule violations. Due to the ambiguity inherent in regulatory performance information, citizens may interpret disclosed information as a reflection of prevalent rule violations and thereby reduce support for relevant public facilities. Furthermore, the negative association between regulatory transparency and citizen support is contingent on citizens’ use of social media. We test these arguments in the nuclear energy regulatory domain using original, nationally representative survey data and an independent environmental regulation transparency index in China. Findings reveal that regulatory transparency reduces citizen support for proposed nuclear power programs. We also find that regulatory transparency is particularly influential for respondents with relatively higher levels of social media usage. These findings highlight the dilemma that governments face when they seek to enhance policy support through transparency in the digital age.KEYWORDS: Regulatory transparencycitizen supportgovernment decisionssocial medianuclear energy AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank anonymous reviewers for all the constructive and insightful comments.We are grafeful for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the paper from Jing Zhao, Hanzhang Liu, and Youlang Zhang. We extend our gratitude to scholars who provided feedback at conferences of AP-PPN, PMSA, and PMRC since 2018.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For more information on worldwide nuclear energy policies, see the website of the International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/news.2 See media report ‘Chinese Scramble to Buy Salt as Radiation Fears Grow’. CNN, March 18, 2011, http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/17/china.salt.scramble/index.html.3 See replies to the post ‘People in Fangchenggang oppose the construction of Bailong Nuclear Power Plant, please respect public opinion’, Hongdou Forum, May 4, 2022, https://hd3g.gxnews.com.cn/viewthread.php?t=17820210&.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 72304100 ]; Yangfan Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [grant number 23YF1410100], Chunhui Plan Cooperation and Research Project, Ministry of Education of China [grant number HZKY20220070]; The Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China: “Research on the reformation and innovation of national climate governance system towards carbon neutrality” [grant number 72140007].Notes on contributorsJuan DuJuan Du is an Associated Professor at School of Public Administration, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. Her research focuses on policy process, policy analysis and environmental policy. Her research has been published in Public Administration, The China Quarterly, Public Performance & Management Review, International Public Management Journal, among others.Xufeng ZhuXufeng Zhu is Professor and Dean at the School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, China. His major research interests in China studies are the policy process, think tanks, and public governance. He is the author of seven books in English or in Chinese. His recent publications include articles in Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Public Administration Review, Public Administration, Governance, Policy Studies Journal, Sustainable Development, and so on.
监管透明度和公民对政府决策的支持:来自中国核电接受度的证据
摘要本研究考察了透明度作为一种治理机制对公民支持有争议的政府公共设施决策的影响。本文在政府透明度文献的基础上,认为监管透明度具有监管执法和违规的双重含义。由于监管绩效信息固有的模糊性,公民可能会将披露的信息解释为普遍违反规则的反映,从而减少对相关公共设施的支持。此外,监管透明度与公民支持之间的负相关关系取决于公民对社交媒体的使用。我们在核能监管领域使用原始的、具有全国代表性的调查数据和中国独立的环境监管透明度指数来检验这些论点。调查结果显示,监管透明度降低了公民对拟议核电项目的支持。我们还发现,监管透明度对社交媒体使用水平相对较高的受访者尤其有影响。这些发现凸显了政府在数字时代寻求通过透明度加强政策支持时所面临的困境。关键词:监管透明度公民支持政府决策社会媒体核能致谢我们要感谢匿名审稿人提供的所有建设性和有见地的评论。我们非常感谢Jing Zhao, Hanzhang Liu和Youlang Zhang对论文早期草稿的有益评论。感谢2018年以来在AP-PPN、PMSA和PMRC会议上提供反馈的学者。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1有关世界各国核能政策的更多信息,请参见国际原子能机构网站:https://www.iaea.org/news.2参见媒体报道《中国抢购食盐,担心核辐射加剧》。CNN, 2011年3月18日,http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/17/china.salt.scramble/index.html.3见《防城港民众反对建设白龙核电站,请尊重民意》帖子的回复,《红豆论坛》,2022年5月4日,https://hd3g.gxnews.com.cn/viewthread.php?t=17820210&.Additional信息经费本工作得到国家自然科学基金支持[批准号:72304100];上海市科委杨帆项目[批准号23YF1410100],教育部春晖计划合作研究项目[批准号HZKY20220070];国家自然科学基金重点项目:“面向碳中和的国家气候治理体系改革与创新研究”[批准号72140007]。作者简介:杜鹃,华东师范大学公共管理学院副教授。主要研究方向为政策过程、政策分析和环境政策。她的研究成果发表在《公共管理》、《中国季刊》、《公共绩效与管理评论》、《国际公共管理杂志》等刊物上。朱旭峰,中国清华大学公共政策与管理学院教授、院长。他在中国研究方面的主要研究兴趣是政策过程、智库和公共治理。他著有七本中英文书籍。最近在《公共管理研究与理论》、《公共管理评论》、《公共管理》、《治理》、《政策研究》、《可持续发展》等刊物上发表文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信