Development and validation of a multi-domain survey assessing student experiences with school-based restorative practices implementation: community based participatory research at work for school equity

Q2 Social Sciences
Amanda Davis Simpfenderfer, Bernice Garnett, Lance Smith, Mika Moore, Henri Sparks, Lisa Bedinger, Jon Kidde
{"title":"Development and validation of a multi-domain survey assessing student experiences with school-based restorative practices implementation: community based participatory research at work for school equity","authors":"Amanda Davis Simpfenderfer, Bernice Garnett, Lance Smith, Mika Moore, Henri Sparks, Lisa Bedinger, Jon Kidde","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2023.2258904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe emerging research base on Restorative Practices (RP) efficacy in schools lacks validated instruments of RP implementation fidelity that capture youth responsiveness to RP components. Therefore, members of a University-District Community Based Participatory (CBPR) project collaboratively developed the Student Restorative Culture Survey (SRCS). This study seeks to examine the construct validity of the SRCS using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the theoretical foundations of the instrument. This study found evidence supporting the construct validity for the SRCS with a five-factor structure of RP Benefits, RP Quality, School Support, Repair Harm, and Feeling Left Out. Given that RP is rooted in an emancipatory paradigm, it is critical to ensure that implementation measures reflect contextual modifications and center student experiences.KEYWORDS: Restorative practicessurvey validationyouth voiceimplementation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2023.2258904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe emerging research base on Restorative Practices (RP) efficacy in schools lacks validated instruments of RP implementation fidelity that capture youth responsiveness to RP components. Therefore, members of a University-District Community Based Participatory (CBPR) project collaboratively developed the Student Restorative Culture Survey (SRCS). This study seeks to examine the construct validity of the SRCS using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the theoretical foundations of the instrument. This study found evidence supporting the construct validity for the SRCS with a five-factor structure of RP Benefits, RP Quality, School Support, Repair Harm, and Feeling Left Out. Given that RP is rooted in an emancipatory paradigm, it is critical to ensure that implementation measures reflect contextual modifications and center student experiences.KEYWORDS: Restorative practicessurvey validationyouth voiceimplementation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
开发和验证一项多领域调查,评估以学校为基础的恢复性实践实施的学生体验:基于社区的参与研究在学校公平的工作
摘要基于学校恢复性实践(RP)有效性的新兴研究缺乏RP实施保真度的有效工具,无法捕捉青少年对RP成分的反应性。因此,大学区社区参与性(CBPR)项目的成员合作开发了学生恢复性文化调查(SRCS)。本研究旨在利用验证性因子分析(CFA)来检验SRCS的结构效度,以检验该工具的理论基础。本研究以RP利益、RP质量、学校支持、修复伤害和被遗忘感五因子结构为基础,发现支持SRCS建构效度的证据。考虑到RP根植于一种解放的范式,确保实施措施反映情境变化和以学生经验为中心是至关重要的。关键词:恢复性实践调查验证青少年语音实施披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Justice Review
Contemporary Justice Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信