{"title":"Does left populism short-circuit itself? Podemos in the labyrinths of cultural elitism and radical leftism","authors":"Raúl Rojas-Andrés, Samuele Mazzolini, Jacopo Custodi","doi":"10.1080/14782804.2023.2269375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPodemos’ initial left populist strategy and electoral success have been the subject of much academic debate. However, amid the party’s rapidly declining numbers at the polls, scholarly attention towards the Spanish party has been on the wane. Based on a discussion of the existing literature and a mixture of qualitative methods, this paper attempts to capture the distinctive features of the early populist gamble and two internal elements that progressively short-circuited it. The first is related to the cultural elitism of Podemos’ leadership, a phenomenon observed especially within the faction of Íñigo Errejón, former number 2 of the party. The intellectualist distinction of many of its members proved to be a repressive instance that jeopardised the populist practice. The second is instead the return to a radical left fold, which is instead to be attributed to Podemos’ former leader Pablo Iglesias and his successor Ione Belarra. Party factionalism, strong leftist symbolism and the promotion of identity politics stand here among the most visible factors that negated the initial transversal approach. In different ways, those elements re-established the previous symbolic space that Podemos’ populism had been trying to supersede and sabotage the possibility of securing a broad and durable popular identity.KEYWORDS: Podemospopulismradical leftcultural elitismpolitical strategy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Due to Twitter's internal limitations, no search of tweets can access the complete history of posts, and therefore cannot generate a representative sample (see: Álvarez-Peralta, Rojas-Andrés, and Diefenbacher Citation2023, 14–15).2. The Spanish term in question is ‘compañero’, which is akin to the English ‘comrade’, but carries a milder political connotation and can also be employed as ‘fellow’. It finds frequent use within radical left circles.","PeriodicalId":46035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary European Studies","volume":"254 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2269375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTPodemos’ initial left populist strategy and electoral success have been the subject of much academic debate. However, amid the party’s rapidly declining numbers at the polls, scholarly attention towards the Spanish party has been on the wane. Based on a discussion of the existing literature and a mixture of qualitative methods, this paper attempts to capture the distinctive features of the early populist gamble and two internal elements that progressively short-circuited it. The first is related to the cultural elitism of Podemos’ leadership, a phenomenon observed especially within the faction of Íñigo Errejón, former number 2 of the party. The intellectualist distinction of many of its members proved to be a repressive instance that jeopardised the populist practice. The second is instead the return to a radical left fold, which is instead to be attributed to Podemos’ former leader Pablo Iglesias and his successor Ione Belarra. Party factionalism, strong leftist symbolism and the promotion of identity politics stand here among the most visible factors that negated the initial transversal approach. In different ways, those elements re-established the previous symbolic space that Podemos’ populism had been trying to supersede and sabotage the possibility of securing a broad and durable popular identity.KEYWORDS: Podemospopulismradical leftcultural elitismpolitical strategy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Due to Twitter's internal limitations, no search of tweets can access the complete history of posts, and therefore cannot generate a representative sample (see: Álvarez-Peralta, Rojas-Andrés, and Diefenbacher Citation2023, 14–15).2. The Spanish term in question is ‘compañero’, which is akin to the English ‘comrade’, but carries a milder political connotation and can also be employed as ‘fellow’. It finds frequent use within radical left circles.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contemporary European Studies (previously Journal of European Area Studies) seeks to provide a forum for interdisciplinary debate about the theory and practice of area studies as well as for empirical studies of European societies, politics and cultures. The central area focus of the journal is European in its broadest geographical definition. However, the examination of European "areas" and themes are enhanced as a matter of editorial policy by non-European perspectives. The Journal intends to attract the interest of both cross-national and single-country specialists in European studies and to counteract the worst features of Eurocentrism with coverage of non-European views on European themes.