Stochastic Programming Model in Least Cost Feed Formulation for Lactating Cattle

Vishal Patil, Radha Gupta, D. Rajendran, Ravinder Singh Kuntal, Manasa Chanda
{"title":"Stochastic Programming Model in Least Cost Feed Formulation for Lactating Cattle","authors":"Vishal Patil, Radha Gupta, D. Rajendran, Ravinder Singh Kuntal, Manasa Chanda","doi":"10.32734/injar.v5i03.9195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A conventional linear programming model (LPM) for feed formulation of lactating cattle will overlook the variation in feed components. LPM only considers the mean composition of feed values, regardless of variations, the confidence in satisfying the nutrient need falls to 50%. Whereas the stochastic model (SM), which takes into account both the mean and variation of feed composition and provides 90-99% confidence in meeting the nutrient need. In present work, we have proposed SM for least-cost feed formulation of lactating cattle where the variation in the composition of nutrients like crude protein (CP), Calcium (Ca) and Phosphorus (P) in the feedstuff are considered. Data provided by the National Research Council (2001) are the basis for the current analysis. These SMs are resolved using M.S. Excel's Generalized Reduced Gradient (GRG) nonlinear and LINGO's Nonlinear solver, and the results are compared to LPM; the feed formulated by SM (90 % and 99 %) has the lowest cost when compared to LPM. Nutrients estimated by LPM, SM by GRG nonlinear, and SM by Nonlinear solver utilized for feed formulation had no significant differences as (p>0.05). When compared to LPM, the stochastic model is a better technique, particularly when dealing with nutrient variation.","PeriodicalId":34255,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32734/injar.v5i03.9195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A conventional linear programming model (LPM) for feed formulation of lactating cattle will overlook the variation in feed components. LPM only considers the mean composition of feed values, regardless of variations, the confidence in satisfying the nutrient need falls to 50%. Whereas the stochastic model (SM), which takes into account both the mean and variation of feed composition and provides 90-99% confidence in meeting the nutrient need. In present work, we have proposed SM for least-cost feed formulation of lactating cattle where the variation in the composition of nutrients like crude protein (CP), Calcium (Ca) and Phosphorus (P) in the feedstuff are considered. Data provided by the National Research Council (2001) are the basis for the current analysis. These SMs are resolved using M.S. Excel's Generalized Reduced Gradient (GRG) nonlinear and LINGO's Nonlinear solver, and the results are compared to LPM; the feed formulated by SM (90 % and 99 %) has the lowest cost when compared to LPM. Nutrients estimated by LPM, SM by GRG nonlinear, and SM by Nonlinear solver utilized for feed formulation had no significant differences as (p>0.05). When compared to LPM, the stochastic model is a better technique, particularly when dealing with nutrient variation.
乳牛最低成本饲料配方的随机规划模型
传统的乳牛饲料配方线性规划模型(LPM)忽略了饲料成分的变化。LPM只考虑饲料价值的平均组成,不考虑变化,满足营养需求的置信度降至50%。而随机模型(SM)则考虑了饲料成分的平均值和变化,在满足营养需求方面提供了90-99%的置信度。在本工作中,我们提出了考虑饲料中粗蛋白质(CP)、钙(Ca)和磷(P)等营养成分组成变化的最低成本乳牛饲料配方。国家研究委员会(2001年)提供的数据是当前分析的基础。利用ms . Excel的广义降阶梯度(GRG)非线性和LINGO的非线性求解器对这些SMs进行了求解,并将结果与LPM进行了比较;与LPM相比,SM(90%和99%)配制的饲料成本最低。饲料配方中LPM估算的营养成分、GRG非线性估算的营养成分和非线性求解器估算的营养成分无显著差异(p>0.05)。与LPM相比,随机模型是一种更好的技术,特别是在处理养分变化时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信