A Cultural History of Fairy Tales

IF 0.5 2区 社会学 0 FOLKLORE
Sarah Allison, Ruth B. Bottigheimer, Abigail R. Heiniger, Sarah N. Lawson, Veronica Schanoes
{"title":"A Cultural History of Fairy Tales","authors":"Sarah Allison, Ruth B. Bottigheimer, Abigail R. Heiniger, Sarah N. Lawson, Veronica Schanoes","doi":"10.5406/15351882.136.541.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The six-volume set A Cultural History of Fairy Tales seeks to provide a transnational history of the forms of the fairy tale and their adaptations from 500 BCE to the present. Although there are occasional gaps in its coverage of world literature, the set as a whole should prove invaluable to current and future fairy-tale scholars. Each volume could serve as an excellent teaching tool for courses on specific histories of the fairy tale or in a broader examination of themes in the fairy-tale genre overall.Volume 1, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in Antiquity, edited by Debbie Felton, is especially good in its examinations of ancient analogues to modern fairy tales. Felton's introduction asks whether stories like “Rhodopis” or “Cupid and Psyche” are true fairy tales. The difficulty in agreeing on the definition of fairy tales complicates the task of tracing their history. In the chapter “Forms of the Marvelous,” Graham Anderson examines fantastical creatures, places, and objects in Greek and Roman literature. Emanuele Lelli's “Adaptations” deals with the circulation of fables and fairy tales throughout ancient Greece and Rome. In “Gender and Sexuality,” Serinity Young examines a range of Asian stories beginning with the swan maiden tale type. In “Humans and Non-Humans,” Kenneth Kitchell explores the depiction of animals in Greek and Roman fables. Felton's “Monsters and the Monstrous” section examines mythical monsters from the Near East and the Mediterranean, such as Medusa. Julia Doroszewska and Janek Kucharski's “Spaces” focuses on how borders and distance play into Greek and Roman stories. Dominic Ingemark and Camilla Asplund Ingemark's “Socialization” examines fairy tales as moral messages, particularly in Roman works. Finally, Felton's “Power” looks at societal attitudes toward power in Roman, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern myths and fables.This volume gathers in-depth examinations of ancient fairy tales, identifying parallels in content to modern equivalents and comparing their relationships to the overlapping categories of myths and fables. While many questions remain, such as the debate over whether fairy tales inspired myth or vice versa, the chapters are deep and illuminating.Noticeably, most of the chapters focus on Greek and Roman works. Certain names quickly become familiar, such as Apuleius, Aesop, Perseus, Gyges, and Psyche, which makes the volume's ventures into other geographical areas all the more conspicuous. Young's excellent piece on gender roles in Asian fairy tales particularly stands out, examining materials touched on by none of the other chapters, such as the Rig Veda. More material like this might have significantly enhanced the six-volume set.Not surprisingly, fairies are the primary theme in Volume 2, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in the Middle Ages, edited by Susan Aronstein, as the series reaches a point where beings by that name began appearing in written literature. It really is a study of tales about fairies. As in the previous volume, the introduction is dominated by the question of what counts as a fairy tale. Medieval romances aren't always counted, although they contain many fairy-tale tropes. Aronstein's introduction begins with castles. Fairy tales as we know them, although they date from the seventeenth century onward, typically have a medieval setting with castles as a signature fixture. Aronstein concludes that modern fairy tales are a form of medievalism, idealizing the past.Richard Firth Green's “Forms of the Marvelous” examines medieval beliefs in fairies and the antagonistic reaction of the Christian Church, which censored them from narratives of the time. Shyama Rajendran's “Adaptations” presents a possible influence of the One Thousand and One Nights on The Decameron and The Canterbury Tales within traditional approaches that hold that the original collection was known in the West before Antoine Galland's eighteenth-century translation, a view to which alternative narrative routes are beginning to emerge. Lynn Shutters’ “Gender and Sexuality” compares three romances from different time periods, each one about cursed serpent maidens, along with the contemporary ideas surrounding beauty, virtue, and marriage. Sarah L. Higley's “Human and Non-Human” focuses on Melusine, and Christine M. Neufeld's “Monsters and the Monstrous” examines medieval ideas of monsters, from monstrous births to dragons. Helen Fulton's “Spaces” surrounds fairy kingdoms and societies in myth and romance. Usha Vishnuvajjala's “Socialization” goes into social relationships in European, Persian, and Japanese courtly texts. Melissa Ridley Elmes’ “Power” explores how fairies in medieval works disrupt the status quo and serve as commentary on or critique of human power structures.Volume 2 feels more geographically well-rounded than its predecessor, with more locations represented. The focus on fairies in folk belief enables discussion of their connection to gender roles and societal status quo. Melusine is an especially popular subject in the volume, along with associated concepts of otherworldly wives and cursed maidens. This is another solid entry in the series.Volume 3, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in the Age of the Marvelous, edited by Suzanne Magnanini, covers 1450 to 1650 CE, a period dominated by Italian writers and collectors such as Giambattista Basile and Giovan Francesco Straparola. Accordingly, this volume includes several chapters discussing the tremendous impact the works of these writers had on the fairy-tale canon and the role these tales played in their cultural contexts. Each chapter brings refreshing information to what may easily become well-trodden territory, making Volume 3 an invaluable addition to fairy-tale scholarship.For example, Cristina Mazzoni writes on the themes of gender and sexuality, which are famously complex in the Italian tales in “Gender and Sexuality: Gender and Sexuality in the Fairy Tales of Straparola and Basile.” Davide Papotti examines how the tales both uphold and subvert power dynamics common to the era and also describes the moral ambiguity that runs rampant through the stories in “Spaces: Geographies of the Fairy Tale in Giambattista Basile's The Tale of Tales.” Neither chapter attempts to provide ironclad conclusions on either topic, but, instead, both chapters invite readers to think critically and engage in further scholarship.Volume 3 also includes comparative approaches. In “Monsters and the Monstrous: Witches and Werewolves in Early Modern French and Italian Tales,” Kathleen P. Long usefully compares monstrosity in the Italian texts with French texts of the period and those that followed in the seventeenth century, providing links to subsequent volumes of this collection. Most exciting was N. Ipek Hüner Cora's chapter “Adaptations: Prose Stories Dressed in Ottoman Attire” on adaptations within Ottoman tales of the period, and Laura Nüffer's chapter “Humans and Non-Humans: Animal Bridegrooms and Brides in Japanese Otogizoshi” about animal brides and bridegrooms in Japanese tales. Despite being included in a volume on an era dominated by the Italians, neither of these chapters feels out of place.Every chapter in Volume 3 is immaculately researched, well-written, and accessible—bringing the most contemporary fairy-tale scholarship to the table. Frequently cited are Ruth Bottigheimer, Nancy Canepa, Lewis Seifert, and Jack Zipes, situating this cultural history in direct conversation with these sources in a way that provides new opportunities for scholarship on fairy tales in the age of the marvelous beyond the most controversial debates of the past 20 years.Volume 4, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in the Long Eighteenth Century, edited by Duggan, covers the period from 1650 to 1800. It treats fairy tales (Charles Perrault), fairyland fictions (Madame d'Aulnoy and other conteuses), and oriental tales (Galland's Mille et Une Nuits and its further translations and derivatives) as a single genre. Calling their named creators “authors” and paying close attention to the tales’ publication histories, Duggan tacitly acknowledges Manfred Grätz's Das Märchen in der deutschen Aufklärung: Vom Feenmärchen zum Volksmärchen (1988), which documents the dissemination in print of French contes de fées to Germany, where they gradually morphed into Volksmärchen.Lengthy fairyland fictions with their parallel fairy realms dominate the “Introduction” and essays of Volume 4, among which Tatiana Korneeva's “Forms of Marvelous” is especially provocative for its fresh and wide-ranging material. “Monsters and the Monstrous: Of Ogre Pyramids, Ruby-Eyed Dragons, and Gnomes with Crooked Spines,” by Kathryn A. Hoffmann, makes the point that the long eighteenth century was the last period in which a woman's sway over magic allowed her to be viewed as powerful rather than as wicked. Hoffmann's essay engages productively with the scholarship of Raymonde Robert, who edited the writings of more than 10 contes de fées authors in the prominent Champion series, Bibliothèque des Génies et des Fées. In “Gender and Sexuality,” Aileen Douglas explores the transformation of sexuality as it moved from d'Aulnoy's “Island of Happiness” to a mid-eighteenth-century English school novel. Rania Huntington's “Slight Channels: Socialization in Tales of Wonder” examines fairy tales as agents of cultural socialization. Magic animals and monsters come under Lewis Seifert's (and also Kathryn Hoffmann's) lens in “The Human and the Non-Human in Fairy Tales,” while Duggan examines the distribution of power by gender and class in fairy and oriental tales in the ancien régime in “Political and Social Power in Fairy and Oriental Tales.” In discussing the slow transformation of a seventeenth-century-published Italian tale via a French publication into a version suitable for folk consumption in Germany, Charlotte Trinquet du Lys in “Fairy-Tale Adaptations in the Long Eighteenth Century” pays particular attention to the brief tales that André Jolles called eigentliche Märchen, while Richard van Leeuwen in “Space and Narrative Strategies in Eighteenth-Century Tales in East and West” and Rania Huntington in “Slight Channels” incorporate Chinese and Japanese tales into the predominantly French canon discussed here.Volume 5, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in the Long Nineteenth Century, edited by Naomi Wood, is a brilliant collection of seven essays that delve into the multifaceted and often competing cultural trends of an era that Zipes in 2013 dubbed the “golden age” of the fairy-tale genre (in The Golden Age of Folk and Fairy Tales: From the Brothers Grimm to Andrew Lang). Wood's introduction does a beautiful job of painting the English-speaking world of nineteenth-century fairy tales in broad strokes while still introducing the complex matrix of cultural forces to be explored in depth in the collected essays.Volume 5 is an agile, broad-reaching collection that supports a wide range of fairy-tale analyses, particularly in English. Unlike collections of essays that argue a single thesis, these essays provide background on their topics, which makes them particularly useful as a classroom resource for research. The essays are united by more than just time period; Wood's treatment of Romanticism gives the heart of the collection a more unified feel despite the diverse topics and authors. Although the essays primarily reference mainstream fairy-tale authors in the English language with a few notable exceptions, the limitations of these sources are openly acknowledged, and the broad cultural background of the chapters gives this volume wider cultural appeal for fairy-tale studies.Written by a balance of experienced scholars and new voices, the chapters in Volume 5 cover most of the same broad topics as others in the set: genre, adaptation, gender and sexuality, ecocriticism, monsters, space, and society. Each chapter is well-researched with a comprehensive range of critical references. Like the introduction, chapters do not seek to support a single thesis so much as to demonstrate a broad range of ideas and influences. There are no similar resources with such a broad, comprehensive approach to English-language fairy tales in the nineteenth century. The chapter on adaptation specifically opens the study of fairy tales to literary genres like the novel, which are typically overlooked in fairy-tale studies during this era. By expanding the concept of genre, this collection has the flexibility to apply to the fairy-tale and anti-tale narratives embedded in a more diverse range of texts.Volume 6, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in the Modern Age, edited by Andrew Teverson, opens with Teverson's own erudite overview of the theoretical movements of the past hundred years that have informed popular, creative, and critical understandings of fairy tales. Encompassing Afro-surrealism, Roland Barthes, Walter Benjamin, feminism, Marxism, psychoanalysis, structuralism, surrealism, and more, Teverson coherently surveys how we think about and have thought about fairy tales. His introduction is admirably matched by Kimberly Lau's closing essay on “Power,” which lays bare how Eurocentrism and white supremacy have structured the tools of our study. Lau begins to remedy the lack of race as a heuristic by analyzing Helen Oyeyemi's White Is for Witching (2009). These two essays, which both take a long view of fairy-tale scholarship, are excellent escorts into and out of Volume 6.Between them are other striking pieces, such as Jeana Jorgensen's “Gender and Sexuality” and Jill Terry Rudy's “Socialization: Traditional Wonder Tales and Other Guides for Growing Up.” Noting that the modern age more explicitly references gender and sexuality in fairy tales, Jorgensen cogently analyzes modern understandings of gender and/or sexuality. Rudy considers how wonder tales—including both fairy tales and wonder stories from non-Western cultures—can and have been used by children learning to be in the world. Rudy considers not only psychoanalysis, but also cognitive-affective approaches to understanding how fairy tales and other narratives work to socialize.Curiously, Jorgensen's and Rudy's essays contain the only sustained discussions of Disney in the volume, though only for a few pages. While each essay in the volume acknowledges the Disney behemoth and its overwhelming influence on fairy tales in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, little critical attention is paid to it. Sara Upstone's essay, “Spaces: The Magically Real Spaces of Twentieth- and Twenty-First-Century Fairy Tale,” in particular seems like a missed opportunity. While Upstone discusses representations of space in various twentieth-century fantasy novels, one wonders why the volume does not analyze physical fairy-tale spaces, such as Disney's theme parks or “The German Fairy Tale Route,” mentioned by Mayako Murai in her essay “Adaptation.” Surely, the physical immersion of the fairy-tale consumer/aficionado in a world of fairy tales merits more discussion.Perhaps implicitly, the organization of the six volumes suggests that fairy tales have existed as a genre for 2,500-plus years and that definitions of this genre privilege a tale's constitutive motifs, such as cursed maidens, powerful monsters, impossible tasks, three siblings, and so on. According to this model, fairy-tale motifs take precedence over both the plots (happy or unhappy endings here on earth, or in an afterlife) and the genres within which those motifs reside. Some of these motifs have appeared in literary forms as varied as fable, fairy tale, fairyland fictions, folktale, myth, romance, and adaptations as novels. As a result, the overarching model seems very narrow on one side (i.e., that motifs alone determine fairy-tale-ness) and very broad on the other (i.e., that those same motifs may appear in many disparate genres).Admittedly, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales could not possibly encompass all of the developments of fairy tales over the past 2,500 years. On the whole, the collection contains worthy, enlightening essays in six handsomely produced volumes. Bloomsbury might have seen fit to publish the figures accompanying the essays in color rather than in black-and-white, but that does not detract from the essays’ very real, thoughtful, and elegant analyses. This impressive collection would be a strong addition to any public or academic library.","PeriodicalId":46681,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLORE","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLORE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/15351882.136.541.08","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The six-volume set A Cultural History of Fairy Tales seeks to provide a transnational history of the forms of the fairy tale and their adaptations from 500 BCE to the present. Although there are occasional gaps in its coverage of world literature, the set as a whole should prove invaluable to current and future fairy-tale scholars. Each volume could serve as an excellent teaching tool for courses on specific histories of the fairy tale or in a broader examination of themes in the fairy-tale genre overall.Volume 1, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in Antiquity, edited by Debbie Felton, is especially good in its examinations of ancient analogues to modern fairy tales. Felton's introduction asks whether stories like “Rhodopis” or “Cupid and Psyche” are true fairy tales. The difficulty in agreeing on the definition of fairy tales complicates the task of tracing their history. In the chapter “Forms of the Marvelous,” Graham Anderson examines fantastical creatures, places, and objects in Greek and Roman literature. Emanuele Lelli's “Adaptations” deals with the circulation of fables and fairy tales throughout ancient Greece and Rome. In “Gender and Sexuality,” Serinity Young examines a range of Asian stories beginning with the swan maiden tale type. In “Humans and Non-Humans,” Kenneth Kitchell explores the depiction of animals in Greek and Roman fables. Felton's “Monsters and the Monstrous” section examines mythical monsters from the Near East and the Mediterranean, such as Medusa. Julia Doroszewska and Janek Kucharski's “Spaces” focuses on how borders and distance play into Greek and Roman stories. Dominic Ingemark and Camilla Asplund Ingemark's “Socialization” examines fairy tales as moral messages, particularly in Roman works. Finally, Felton's “Power” looks at societal attitudes toward power in Roman, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern myths and fables.This volume gathers in-depth examinations of ancient fairy tales, identifying parallels in content to modern equivalents and comparing their relationships to the overlapping categories of myths and fables. While many questions remain, such as the debate over whether fairy tales inspired myth or vice versa, the chapters are deep and illuminating.Noticeably, most of the chapters focus on Greek and Roman works. Certain names quickly become familiar, such as Apuleius, Aesop, Perseus, Gyges, and Psyche, which makes the volume's ventures into other geographical areas all the more conspicuous. Young's excellent piece on gender roles in Asian fairy tales particularly stands out, examining materials touched on by none of the other chapters, such as the Rig Veda. More material like this might have significantly enhanced the six-volume set.Not surprisingly, fairies are the primary theme in Volume 2, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in the Middle Ages, edited by Susan Aronstein, as the series reaches a point where beings by that name began appearing in written literature. It really is a study of tales about fairies. As in the previous volume, the introduction is dominated by the question of what counts as a fairy tale. Medieval romances aren't always counted, although they contain many fairy-tale tropes. Aronstein's introduction begins with castles. Fairy tales as we know them, although they date from the seventeenth century onward, typically have a medieval setting with castles as a signature fixture. Aronstein concludes that modern fairy tales are a form of medievalism, idealizing the past.Richard Firth Green's “Forms of the Marvelous” examines medieval beliefs in fairies and the antagonistic reaction of the Christian Church, which censored them from narratives of the time. Shyama Rajendran's “Adaptations” presents a possible influence of the One Thousand and One Nights on The Decameron and The Canterbury Tales within traditional approaches that hold that the original collection was known in the West before Antoine Galland's eighteenth-century translation, a view to which alternative narrative routes are beginning to emerge. Lynn Shutters’ “Gender and Sexuality” compares three romances from different time periods, each one about cursed serpent maidens, along with the contemporary ideas surrounding beauty, virtue, and marriage. Sarah L. Higley's “Human and Non-Human” focuses on Melusine, and Christine M. Neufeld's “Monsters and the Monstrous” examines medieval ideas of monsters, from monstrous births to dragons. Helen Fulton's “Spaces” surrounds fairy kingdoms and societies in myth and romance. Usha Vishnuvajjala's “Socialization” goes into social relationships in European, Persian, and Japanese courtly texts. Melissa Ridley Elmes’ “Power” explores how fairies in medieval works disrupt the status quo and serve as commentary on or critique of human power structures.Volume 2 feels more geographically well-rounded than its predecessor, with more locations represented. The focus on fairies in folk belief enables discussion of their connection to gender roles and societal status quo. Melusine is an especially popular subject in the volume, along with associated concepts of otherworldly wives and cursed maidens. This is another solid entry in the series.Volume 3, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in the Age of the Marvelous, edited by Suzanne Magnanini, covers 1450 to 1650 CE, a period dominated by Italian writers and collectors such as Giambattista Basile and Giovan Francesco Straparola. Accordingly, this volume includes several chapters discussing the tremendous impact the works of these writers had on the fairy-tale canon and the role these tales played in their cultural contexts. Each chapter brings refreshing information to what may easily become well-trodden territory, making Volume 3 an invaluable addition to fairy-tale scholarship.For example, Cristina Mazzoni writes on the themes of gender and sexuality, which are famously complex in the Italian tales in “Gender and Sexuality: Gender and Sexuality in the Fairy Tales of Straparola and Basile.” Davide Papotti examines how the tales both uphold and subvert power dynamics common to the era and also describes the moral ambiguity that runs rampant through the stories in “Spaces: Geographies of the Fairy Tale in Giambattista Basile's The Tale of Tales.” Neither chapter attempts to provide ironclad conclusions on either topic, but, instead, both chapters invite readers to think critically and engage in further scholarship.Volume 3 also includes comparative approaches. In “Monsters and the Monstrous: Witches and Werewolves in Early Modern French and Italian Tales,” Kathleen P. Long usefully compares monstrosity in the Italian texts with French texts of the period and those that followed in the seventeenth century, providing links to subsequent volumes of this collection. Most exciting was N. Ipek Hüner Cora's chapter “Adaptations: Prose Stories Dressed in Ottoman Attire” on adaptations within Ottoman tales of the period, and Laura Nüffer's chapter “Humans and Non-Humans: Animal Bridegrooms and Brides in Japanese Otogizoshi” about animal brides and bridegrooms in Japanese tales. Despite being included in a volume on an era dominated by the Italians, neither of these chapters feels out of place.Every chapter in Volume 3 is immaculately researched, well-written, and accessible—bringing the most contemporary fairy-tale scholarship to the table. Frequently cited are Ruth Bottigheimer, Nancy Canepa, Lewis Seifert, and Jack Zipes, situating this cultural history in direct conversation with these sources in a way that provides new opportunities for scholarship on fairy tales in the age of the marvelous beyond the most controversial debates of the past 20 years.Volume 4, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in the Long Eighteenth Century, edited by Duggan, covers the period from 1650 to 1800. It treats fairy tales (Charles Perrault), fairyland fictions (Madame d'Aulnoy and other conteuses), and oriental tales (Galland's Mille et Une Nuits and its further translations and derivatives) as a single genre. Calling their named creators “authors” and paying close attention to the tales’ publication histories, Duggan tacitly acknowledges Manfred Grätz's Das Märchen in der deutschen Aufklärung: Vom Feenmärchen zum Volksmärchen (1988), which documents the dissemination in print of French contes de fées to Germany, where they gradually morphed into Volksmärchen.Lengthy fairyland fictions with their parallel fairy realms dominate the “Introduction” and essays of Volume 4, among which Tatiana Korneeva's “Forms of Marvelous” is especially provocative for its fresh and wide-ranging material. “Monsters and the Monstrous: Of Ogre Pyramids, Ruby-Eyed Dragons, and Gnomes with Crooked Spines,” by Kathryn A. Hoffmann, makes the point that the long eighteenth century was the last period in which a woman's sway over magic allowed her to be viewed as powerful rather than as wicked. Hoffmann's essay engages productively with the scholarship of Raymonde Robert, who edited the writings of more than 10 contes de fées authors in the prominent Champion series, Bibliothèque des Génies et des Fées. In “Gender and Sexuality,” Aileen Douglas explores the transformation of sexuality as it moved from d'Aulnoy's “Island of Happiness” to a mid-eighteenth-century English school novel. Rania Huntington's “Slight Channels: Socialization in Tales of Wonder” examines fairy tales as agents of cultural socialization. Magic animals and monsters come under Lewis Seifert's (and also Kathryn Hoffmann's) lens in “The Human and the Non-Human in Fairy Tales,” while Duggan examines the distribution of power by gender and class in fairy and oriental tales in the ancien régime in “Political and Social Power in Fairy and Oriental Tales.” In discussing the slow transformation of a seventeenth-century-published Italian tale via a French publication into a version suitable for folk consumption in Germany, Charlotte Trinquet du Lys in “Fairy-Tale Adaptations in the Long Eighteenth Century” pays particular attention to the brief tales that André Jolles called eigentliche Märchen, while Richard van Leeuwen in “Space and Narrative Strategies in Eighteenth-Century Tales in East and West” and Rania Huntington in “Slight Channels” incorporate Chinese and Japanese tales into the predominantly French canon discussed here.Volume 5, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in the Long Nineteenth Century, edited by Naomi Wood, is a brilliant collection of seven essays that delve into the multifaceted and often competing cultural trends of an era that Zipes in 2013 dubbed the “golden age” of the fairy-tale genre (in The Golden Age of Folk and Fairy Tales: From the Brothers Grimm to Andrew Lang). Wood's introduction does a beautiful job of painting the English-speaking world of nineteenth-century fairy tales in broad strokes while still introducing the complex matrix of cultural forces to be explored in depth in the collected essays.Volume 5 is an agile, broad-reaching collection that supports a wide range of fairy-tale analyses, particularly in English. Unlike collections of essays that argue a single thesis, these essays provide background on their topics, which makes them particularly useful as a classroom resource for research. The essays are united by more than just time period; Wood's treatment of Romanticism gives the heart of the collection a more unified feel despite the diverse topics and authors. Although the essays primarily reference mainstream fairy-tale authors in the English language with a few notable exceptions, the limitations of these sources are openly acknowledged, and the broad cultural background of the chapters gives this volume wider cultural appeal for fairy-tale studies.Written by a balance of experienced scholars and new voices, the chapters in Volume 5 cover most of the same broad topics as others in the set: genre, adaptation, gender and sexuality, ecocriticism, monsters, space, and society. Each chapter is well-researched with a comprehensive range of critical references. Like the introduction, chapters do not seek to support a single thesis so much as to demonstrate a broad range of ideas and influences. There are no similar resources with such a broad, comprehensive approach to English-language fairy tales in the nineteenth century. The chapter on adaptation specifically opens the study of fairy tales to literary genres like the novel, which are typically overlooked in fairy-tale studies during this era. By expanding the concept of genre, this collection has the flexibility to apply to the fairy-tale and anti-tale narratives embedded in a more diverse range of texts.Volume 6, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales in the Modern Age, edited by Andrew Teverson, opens with Teverson's own erudite overview of the theoretical movements of the past hundred years that have informed popular, creative, and critical understandings of fairy tales. Encompassing Afro-surrealism, Roland Barthes, Walter Benjamin, feminism, Marxism, psychoanalysis, structuralism, surrealism, and more, Teverson coherently surveys how we think about and have thought about fairy tales. His introduction is admirably matched by Kimberly Lau's closing essay on “Power,” which lays bare how Eurocentrism and white supremacy have structured the tools of our study. Lau begins to remedy the lack of race as a heuristic by analyzing Helen Oyeyemi's White Is for Witching (2009). These two essays, which both take a long view of fairy-tale scholarship, are excellent escorts into and out of Volume 6.Between them are other striking pieces, such as Jeana Jorgensen's “Gender and Sexuality” and Jill Terry Rudy's “Socialization: Traditional Wonder Tales and Other Guides for Growing Up.” Noting that the modern age more explicitly references gender and sexuality in fairy tales, Jorgensen cogently analyzes modern understandings of gender and/or sexuality. Rudy considers how wonder tales—including both fairy tales and wonder stories from non-Western cultures—can and have been used by children learning to be in the world. Rudy considers not only psychoanalysis, but also cognitive-affective approaches to understanding how fairy tales and other narratives work to socialize.Curiously, Jorgensen's and Rudy's essays contain the only sustained discussions of Disney in the volume, though only for a few pages. While each essay in the volume acknowledges the Disney behemoth and its overwhelming influence on fairy tales in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, little critical attention is paid to it. Sara Upstone's essay, “Spaces: The Magically Real Spaces of Twentieth- and Twenty-First-Century Fairy Tale,” in particular seems like a missed opportunity. While Upstone discusses representations of space in various twentieth-century fantasy novels, one wonders why the volume does not analyze physical fairy-tale spaces, such as Disney's theme parks or “The German Fairy Tale Route,” mentioned by Mayako Murai in her essay “Adaptation.” Surely, the physical immersion of the fairy-tale consumer/aficionado in a world of fairy tales merits more discussion.Perhaps implicitly, the organization of the six volumes suggests that fairy tales have existed as a genre for 2,500-plus years and that definitions of this genre privilege a tale's constitutive motifs, such as cursed maidens, powerful monsters, impossible tasks, three siblings, and so on. According to this model, fairy-tale motifs take precedence over both the plots (happy or unhappy endings here on earth, or in an afterlife) and the genres within which those motifs reside. Some of these motifs have appeared in literary forms as varied as fable, fairy tale, fairyland fictions, folktale, myth, romance, and adaptations as novels. As a result, the overarching model seems very narrow on one side (i.e., that motifs alone determine fairy-tale-ness) and very broad on the other (i.e., that those same motifs may appear in many disparate genres).Admittedly, A Cultural History of Fairy Tales could not possibly encompass all of the developments of fairy tales over the past 2,500 years. On the whole, the collection contains worthy, enlightening essays in six handsomely produced volumes. Bloomsbury might have seen fit to publish the figures accompanying the essays in color rather than in black-and-white, but that does not detract from the essays’ very real, thoughtful, and elegant analyses. This impressive collection would be a strong addition to any public or academic library.
《童话的文化史
在讨论17世纪出版的意大利故事通过法国出版物缓慢转变为适合德国民间消费的版本时,夏洛特·特里克特·杜·里斯在《漫长的18世纪的童话改编》中特别关注了andr<s:1>·乔勒称之为“eigentliche Märchen”的短篇故事,而Richard van Leeuwen在《18世纪东西方故事的空间与叙事策略》和Rania Huntington在《轻微的渠道》中将中国和日本的故事纳入这里讨论的以法国为主的经典中。第五卷《漫长的十九世纪的童话文化史》由内奥米·伍德编辑,是一部精彩的七篇散文合集,深入探讨了一个时代的多方面和经常相互竞争的文化趋势。2013年,齐普斯将这个时代称为童话类型的“黄金时代”(《民间和童话的黄金时代:从格林兄弟到安德鲁·朗)。伍德的引言很好地描绘了19世纪英语世界的童话故事,同时还介绍了文化力量的复杂矩阵,有待在文集中深入探讨。第5卷是一个灵活的,广泛的集合,支持广泛的童话分析,特别是在英语。不像论文集那样只讨论一篇论文,这些论文提供了主题的背景,这使得它们作为课堂研究资源特别有用。这些文章不仅仅是由时间组成的;尽管主题和作者各不相同,但伍德对浪漫主义的处理给了这部合集的核心一种更统一的感觉。虽然这些文章主要参考了英语中主流童话作家的作品,但也有一些明显的例外,这些来源的局限性是公开承认的,章节的广泛文化背景使这本书对童话研究具有更广泛的文化吸引力。由经验丰富的学者和新声音共同撰写,第五卷的章节涵盖了与其他章节相同的广泛主题:类型,改编,性别和性,生态批评,怪物,空间和社会。每一章都有广泛的重要参考文献。像引言一样,章节并不寻求支持一个单一的论点,而是展示广泛的思想和影响。在19世纪,没有类似的资源能提供如此广泛、全面的英语童话。关于改编的章节特别地将童话研究打开到小说这样的文学体裁,这在这个时代的童话研究中通常被忽视。通过扩展体裁的概念,本作品集可以灵活地适用于嵌入在更多样化文本中的童话和反童话叙事。第六卷,现代童话文化史,由安德鲁·特弗森编辑,以特弗森自己对过去一百年来的理论运动的博学概述开始,这些理论运动为流行的、创造性的和批判性的童话理解提供了信息。包括非洲超现实主义、罗兰·巴特、瓦尔特·本雅明、女权主义、马克思主义、精神分析、结构主义、超现实主义等等,特弗森连贯地调查了我们是如何思考和思考童话的。他的引言与金伯利·刘(Kimberly Lau)的结束语《权力》(Power)相得益彰,后者揭示了欧洲中心主义和白人至上主义是如何构建我们的研究工具的。刘德华开始通过分析海伦·欧耶米的《白是女巫》(2009)来弥补种族的缺失。这两篇文章都从长远的角度看待童话学术,是第六卷的优秀陪读。它们之间还有其他引人注目的作品,比如珍娜·乔根森的《性别与性》和吉尔·特里·鲁迪的《社会化:传统奇迹故事和其他成长指南》。乔根森指出,现代社会在童话故事中更明确地提到了性别和性行为,他对现代社会对性别和/或性行为的理解进行了深刻的分析。鲁迪思考了奇迹故事——包括童话故事和非西方文化的奇迹故事——是如何被孩子们用来学习如何生活在这个世界上的。鲁迪不仅考虑了精神分析,还考虑了认知情感方法来理解童话和其他叙事是如何对社交起作用的。奇怪的是,乔根森和鲁迪的文章包含了本书中唯一持续的关于迪士尼的讨论,尽管只有几页。虽然这本书中的每篇文章都承认迪士尼这个庞然大物及其对20世纪和21世纪童话故事的压倒性影响,但很少有批判性的关注。萨拉·厄普斯通(Sara Upstone)的文章《空间:20世纪和21世纪童话的神奇真实空间》(Spaces: The magic Real Spaces of The twenty - first century Fairy Tale)尤其像是错失了一个机会。 虽然厄普斯通讨论了各种20世纪奇幻小说中空间的表现形式,但人们想知道为什么这本书没有分析现实的童话空间,比如迪斯尼的主题公园或村井真子在她的文章《改编》中提到的“德国童话之路”。当然,童话消费者/爱好者在童话世界中的身体沉浸值得更多的讨论。也许这六卷书的组织暗示了童话作为一种体裁已经存在了2500多年,这种体裁的定义赋予了故事的基本主题特权,比如被诅咒的少女、强大的怪物、不可能完成的任务、三个兄弟姐妹等等。根据这一模式,童话主题优先于情节(今生或来世的幸福或不幸结局)和这些主题所在的类型。其中一些主题出现在各种各样的文学形式中,如寓言、童话、仙境小说、民间故事、神话、浪漫故事和改编小说。因此,总体模式一方面显得非常狭隘(即主题本身决定了童话性),另一方面又显得非常宽泛(即相同的主题可能出现在许多不同类型的游戏中)。诚然,《童话文化史》不可能涵盖过去2500年里童话的所有发展。总的来说,这个合集包含了有价值的、有启发性的文章,分为六卷,制作精美。布卢姆茨伯里文化圈可能认为用彩色而不是黑白来发布随笔中的数字是合适的,但这并不影响随笔中非常真实、深思熟虑和优雅的分析。这个令人印象深刻的收藏将是任何公共或学术图书馆的有力补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信