TRANS-SPINAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION WITH INTENSITY 2,5 MA DOES NOT AFFECT THE CORTICOSPINAL SYSTEM EXCITABILITY AND MOTOR SKILLS

Q4 Medicine
Genes and Cells Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.23868/gc545830
Ekaterina Pomelova, Alyona Popyvanova, Dmitry Bredikhin, Maria Koriakina, Anna N. Shestakova, Evgeny D. Blagovechtchenski
{"title":"TRANS-SPINAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION WITH INTENSITY 2,5 MA DOES NOT AFFECT THE CORTICOSPINAL SYSTEM EXCITABILITY AND MOTOR SKILLS","authors":"Ekaterina Pomelova, Alyona Popyvanova, Dmitry Bredikhin, Maria Koriakina, Anna N. Shestakova, Evgeny D. Blagovechtchenski","doi":"10.23868/gc545830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Non-invasive brain stimulation is an effective way to affect movement production, including the spinal cord level. It is known, that the stimulation effects are very sensitive to montage and protocols of applied stimulation, because it can involve different neuronal mechanisms. 
 AIM: The purpose of the study was to estimate the effect of anodal transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) with intensity 2,5 mA applied at the level of the cervical enlargement of the spinal cord (C7-Th1 segments) on the corticospinal system (CSS) excitability and motor skills. 
 METHODS: The study involved 54 healthy adults aged 21,19 3,2 years. The effect of tsDCS was assessed using motor evoked potentials (MEP) from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the primary motor cortex before stimulation, immediately after stimulation, and after 15 minutes.
 RESULTS: Our results showed that the application of an 11-minute anodal tsDCS at the level of the cervical spine C7-Th1 with a current value of 2.5 mA does not affect the MEP of FDI. The statistical analysis demonstrated that the dynamics of MEP amplitudes did not differ between groups receiving anodal tsDCS and sham stimulation. Also, anodal tsDCS did not affect motor skills. An individual's ability to coordinate fingers and manipulate objects effectively (a measure of dexterity) in 9-HPT, and pressing a key in response to a visual stimulus in SRT, did not differ from sham stimulation. 
 CONCLUSION: Therefore, it can be assumed that 2.5 mA anodal tsDCS on the cervical enlargement of the spinal cord does not affect the CSS excitability or change motor skills associated with precise hand movements.","PeriodicalId":12644,"journal":{"name":"Genes and Cells","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes and Cells","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23868/gc545830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive brain stimulation is an effective way to affect movement production, including the spinal cord level. It is known, that the stimulation effects are very sensitive to montage and protocols of applied stimulation, because it can involve different neuronal mechanisms. AIM: The purpose of the study was to estimate the effect of anodal transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) with intensity 2,5 mA applied at the level of the cervical enlargement of the spinal cord (C7-Th1 segments) on the corticospinal system (CSS) excitability and motor skills. METHODS: The study involved 54 healthy adults aged 21,19 3,2 years. The effect of tsDCS was assessed using motor evoked potentials (MEP) from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the primary motor cortex before stimulation, immediately after stimulation, and after 15 minutes. RESULTS: Our results showed that the application of an 11-minute anodal tsDCS at the level of the cervical spine C7-Th1 with a current value of 2.5 mA does not affect the MEP of FDI. The statistical analysis demonstrated that the dynamics of MEP amplitudes did not differ between groups receiving anodal tsDCS and sham stimulation. Also, anodal tsDCS did not affect motor skills. An individual's ability to coordinate fingers and manipulate objects effectively (a measure of dexterity) in 9-HPT, and pressing a key in response to a visual stimulus in SRT, did not differ from sham stimulation. CONCLUSION: Therefore, it can be assumed that 2.5 mA anodal tsDCS on the cervical enlargement of the spinal cord does not affect the CSS excitability or change motor skills associated with precise hand movements.
强度为2,5 ma的经脊髓直流电刺激不影响皮质脊髓系统的兴奋性和运动技能
背景:无创脑刺激是影响运动产生的有效方法,包括脊髓水平。众所周知,刺激效果对蒙太奇和应用刺激方案非常敏感,因为它可以涉及不同的神经元机制。& # x0D;目的:本研究的目的是评估在颈大脊髓(C7-Th1节段)水平施加强度为2,5 mA的经脊髓直流电刺激(tsDCS)对皮质脊髓系统(CSS)兴奋性和运动技能的影响。& # x0D;方法:研究对象为54名年龄分别为21岁、19岁、2岁的健康成人。通过经颅磁刺激初级运动皮层第一背骨间肌的运动诱发电位(MEP)来评估tsDCS的效果,刺激前,刺激后立即和15分钟后。结果:我们的研究结果表明,在颈椎C7-Th1水平施加电流为2.5 mA的11分钟阳极tsDCS不影响FDI的MEP。统计分析表明,在负极刺激组和假刺激组之间,MEP振幅的动态变化没有差异。此外,无节点tsDCS不影响运动技能。在9-HPT测试中,个体协调手指和有效操纵物体的能力(一种灵巧度的衡量标准),以及在SRT测试中对视觉刺激的反应按下键的能力,与假刺激没有区别。& # x0D;结论:因此,可以认为2.5 mA的脊髓颈膨大节段tsDCS不影响CSS兴奋性或改变与手部精确运动相关的运动技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genes and Cells
Genes and Cells Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: “Genes and Cells” (the old name is “Cell Transplantology and Tissue Engineering”) is a peer-reviewed scientific and practical journal recommended by the Higher Attestation Commission of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation for publishing basic materials of dissertation research. Originally conceived as a highly specialized publication, the Journal has now gained an ever wider target audience. If at the beginning of its journey — from September 2005 — the target audience of the journal were biotechnologists, specialists in the field of molecular and cell biology, by now it has expanded with medical practitioners. Such progressive dynamics are absolutely natural — over the last 7-10 years, biomedical technologies have come out of the exotic category, lack of understanding of the inhabitants and mistrust of clinicians have been replaced by interest and awareness of the need to use biotechnology tools in medicine no longer tomorrow, but today. The sections of the journal are formulated to fully disclose the target topics of the publication, convey to readers the opinions of leading experts in the field of biomedical technologies on topical issues of concern, acquaint them with the most significant recent foreign and domestic research, materials of thematic conferences, present analytical information on fundamental issues of biomedical technologies trends in the biotech business. The journal includes the following headings: “expert opinions”, “cell technology news”, “reviews”, “original research”, “clinical experience”, “discussion and general theoretical work”, “stem cell business”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信