{"title":"The everyday political economy of private security","authors":"Adam White, Tessa Diphoorn","doi":"10.1080/10439463.2023.2268256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we map out a new research agenda for studying private security. We do so by bringing together a series of theoretical, methodological, and geographical ‘turns’ in this area of research that, in our view, signpost the way towards a deeper understanding of this market. The first turn is theoretical and concerns the shift from neoclassical economic interpretations of the market for security towards more political economic readings that excavate the various non-economic structures through which this market is constituted. The second turn is methodological and refers to the move from an (over)reliance on formal-legal, census-like data, towards the embrace of thicker qualitative (often ethnographic) data that gives voice to a range of ground-level perspectives in the market for security. The third turn is geographical and relates to how the long-standing focus on the Anglosphere is giving way to a more expansive map of the market for security that incorporates studies from across Africa, Asia, Continental Europe, and South America. We call this research agenda ‘the everyday political economy of private security’.","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2023.2268256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article we map out a new research agenda for studying private security. We do so by bringing together a series of theoretical, methodological, and geographical ‘turns’ in this area of research that, in our view, signpost the way towards a deeper understanding of this market. The first turn is theoretical and concerns the shift from neoclassical economic interpretations of the market for security towards more political economic readings that excavate the various non-economic structures through which this market is constituted. The second turn is methodological and refers to the move from an (over)reliance on formal-legal, census-like data, towards the embrace of thicker qualitative (often ethnographic) data that gives voice to a range of ground-level perspectives in the market for security. The third turn is geographical and relates to how the long-standing focus on the Anglosphere is giving way to a more expansive map of the market for security that incorporates studies from across Africa, Asia, Continental Europe, and South America. We call this research agenda ‘the everyday political economy of private security’.
期刊介绍:
Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.