Women’s autonomy and old age pension transfer in South Africa

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Olanrewaju Adewole Adediran
{"title":"Women’s autonomy and old age pension transfer in South Africa","authors":"Olanrewaju Adewole Adediran","doi":"10.1080/09718524.2023.2204631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractMuch of the existing literature contends that income is a key determinant of women’s autonomy. Yet the causal connection between income and women’s autonomy is difficult to pin down, given the obvious endogeneity bias that may arise from reverse causality and omitting confounding variables correlated with income and women’s autonomy measures. The study assigned a treatment based on the age discontinuity in eligibility for Old Age Pension (OAP) income transfer to investigate the causal effect of income on women’s autonomy. Using a regression discontinuity design (RDD) and a quantile treatment effect, the study found that women’s autonomy responds to changes in income. Moreover, the results from these alternative specifications confirm that the OAP income transfer effect is heterogeneous across the index of women’s autonomy distribution. Specifically, the quantile treatment effect evaluation shows that income transfer has no effect among women with a high degree of autonomy and a low degree of autonomy. However, it bolsters the autonomy that ranges between these extremes.Keywords: Women’s autonomyold age pension transferregression discontinuity design (RDD)quantile treatment effect (QTE) AcknowledgementThe greater part of this article’s contents came from my PhD thesis submitted to the University of Witwatersrand (Wits). Therefore, this publication acknowledges the university’s rights and confirms that there is no conflict of interest regarding the copyright of the thesis.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The requirement for a means test is as follows: an individual household must not earn more than R172560 for married persons or R86280 for a single person to be a beneficiary. In addition, assets must not be worth more than R455200 for a married couple or R1227600 for a single person. Since a means test is compulsory for administrative purposes, the question is whether we can allocate individuals to treatment without it. However, OAP may increase for beneficiaries from R1860 at age 60. At age 75 and above, beneficiaries will receive R1880. For more detailed information see: South African Government (Citation2019) Old age pension retrieved from the website: https://www.gov.za/services/social-benefits-retirement-and-old-age/old-age-pensionAlthough Ambler (Citation2016) suggested that a means test is not mandatory for most South African blacks, the age of eligibility is compulsory.2 Bergmann (Citation1995) and Pollak (Citation2002) view Becker's theory as having unrealistic conclusions in his paper titled “Becker's Theory of the Family: Preposterous Conclusions,\" and other feminist economists come to a similar conclusion.3 For more detail see Becker (Citation1981)4 For detail see Chiappori (Citation1992)5 See McElroy and Horney (Citation1990) for more detail6 Interested readers are referred to Frandsen et al. (Citation2012) for details on the model and applications.7 Quantile treatment effect (QTE) is a unique tool to estimate the dependent variable with connecting nature where the independent variable includes treatment and control (Angrist & Pischke, Citation2008).Additional informationNotes on contributorsOlanrewaju Adewole AdediranOlanrewaju Adewole Adediran has a PhD in economics from the University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. He is a postdoctoral fellow at the Department of Sustainable Livelihoods, School of Business Leadership, University of South Africa. His research areas of interest include gender issues, applied econometrics, development, health, and labour economics.","PeriodicalId":45357,"journal":{"name":"Gender Technology & Development","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Technology & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2023.2204631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractMuch of the existing literature contends that income is a key determinant of women’s autonomy. Yet the causal connection between income and women’s autonomy is difficult to pin down, given the obvious endogeneity bias that may arise from reverse causality and omitting confounding variables correlated with income and women’s autonomy measures. The study assigned a treatment based on the age discontinuity in eligibility for Old Age Pension (OAP) income transfer to investigate the causal effect of income on women’s autonomy. Using a regression discontinuity design (RDD) and a quantile treatment effect, the study found that women’s autonomy responds to changes in income. Moreover, the results from these alternative specifications confirm that the OAP income transfer effect is heterogeneous across the index of women’s autonomy distribution. Specifically, the quantile treatment effect evaluation shows that income transfer has no effect among women with a high degree of autonomy and a low degree of autonomy. However, it bolsters the autonomy that ranges between these extremes.Keywords: Women’s autonomyold age pension transferregression discontinuity design (RDD)quantile treatment effect (QTE) AcknowledgementThe greater part of this article’s contents came from my PhD thesis submitted to the University of Witwatersrand (Wits). Therefore, this publication acknowledges the university’s rights and confirms that there is no conflict of interest regarding the copyright of the thesis.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The requirement for a means test is as follows: an individual household must not earn more than R172560 for married persons or R86280 for a single person to be a beneficiary. In addition, assets must not be worth more than R455200 for a married couple or R1227600 for a single person. Since a means test is compulsory for administrative purposes, the question is whether we can allocate individuals to treatment without it. However, OAP may increase for beneficiaries from R1860 at age 60. At age 75 and above, beneficiaries will receive R1880. For more detailed information see: South African Government (Citation2019) Old age pension retrieved from the website: https://www.gov.za/services/social-benefits-retirement-and-old-age/old-age-pensionAlthough Ambler (Citation2016) suggested that a means test is not mandatory for most South African blacks, the age of eligibility is compulsory.2 Bergmann (Citation1995) and Pollak (Citation2002) view Becker's theory as having unrealistic conclusions in his paper titled “Becker's Theory of the Family: Preposterous Conclusions," and other feminist economists come to a similar conclusion.3 For more detail see Becker (Citation1981)4 For detail see Chiappori (Citation1992)5 See McElroy and Horney (Citation1990) for more detail6 Interested readers are referred to Frandsen et al. (Citation2012) for details on the model and applications.7 Quantile treatment effect (QTE) is a unique tool to estimate the dependent variable with connecting nature where the independent variable includes treatment and control (Angrist & Pischke, Citation2008).Additional informationNotes on contributorsOlanrewaju Adewole AdediranOlanrewaju Adewole Adediran has a PhD in economics from the University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. He is a postdoctoral fellow at the Department of Sustainable Livelihoods, School of Business Leadership, University of South Africa. His research areas of interest include gender issues, applied econometrics, development, health, and labour economics.
南非妇女自治与养老金转移
摘要现有的许多文献都认为收入是女性自主的关键决定因素。然而,收入与女性自主权之间的因果关系很难确定,因为反向因果关系和忽略与收入和女性自主权相关的混淆变量可能会产生明显的内生性偏差。本研究以领取老年养恤金(OAP)收入转移资格的年龄不连续性为基础,对收入对妇女自主性的因果效应进行了研究。采用回归不连续设计(RDD)和分位数处理效应,研究发现女性的自主性对收入的变化有反应。此外,这些替代规范的结果证实了OAP收入转移效应在女性自主性分布指标上的异质性。具体而言,分位数治疗效果评价表明,收入转移对自主程度高和自主程度低的女性没有影响。然而,它支持了介于这两个极端之间的自主权。关键词:女性自主养老金转移回归不连续设计(RDD)分位数治疗效果(QTE)致谢本文的大部分内容来自我提交给威特沃特斯兰德大学(Wits)的博士论文。因此,本出版物承认大学的权利,并确认没有关于论文版权的利益冲突。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1入息审查的要求如下:已婚人士的收入不得超过R172560,单身人士的收入不得超过R86280,才可成为受益人。此外,已婚夫妇的资产不得超过455200兰特,单身人士的资产不得超过1227600兰特。由于经济状况调查是行政上的强制性调查,问题是我们是否可以将个人分配到没有经济状况调查的治疗方案。然而,对于60岁的R1860受益人,OAP可能会增加。在75岁及以上,受益人将获得R1880。参见:南非政府(Citation2019)老年养老金网站:https://www.gov.za/services/social-benefits-retirement-and-old-age/old-age-pensionAlthough Ambler (Citation2016)建议,对大多数南非黑人来说,经济状况调查不是强制性的,资格年龄是强制性的伯格曼(Citation1995)和波拉克(Citation2002)在题为《贝克尔的家庭理论:荒谬的结论》的论文中认为贝克尔的理论得出了不切实际的结论,其他女权主义经济学家也得出了类似的结论详细信息请参见Becker (Citation1981)4详细信息请参见Chiappori (Citation1992)5详细信息请参见McElroy和Horney (Citation1990) 6感兴趣的读者可参考Frandsen等人(Citation2012)了解模型和应用的详细信息分位数治疗效果(QTE)是一种独特的工具,用于估计具有连接性的因变量,其中自变量包括治疗和控制(Angrist & Pischke, Citation2008)。作者简介:olanrewaju Adewole Adediran拥有南非金山大学经济学博士学位。他是南非大学商业领导学院可持续生计系博士后研究员。他的研究领域包括性别问题、应用计量经济学、发展、卫生和劳动经济学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gender Technology & Development
Gender Technology & Development SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Gender, Technology and Development is an international, multi-disciplinary, refereed journal serving as a forum for exploring the linkages among changing gender relations, technological change and developing societies. The journal"s main focus is on the shifting boundaries and meanings of gender, technology and development, addressing transnational phenomena and engaging in dialogues that cut across geographical boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信