Isolation and screening of lactic acid bacteria producing anti-Edwardsiella from the gastrointestinal tract of wild catfish (Clarias gariepinus) for probiotic candidates

IF 1.8 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Awik P. D. Nurhayati, Enny Zulaika, Muhamad Amin, Edwin Setiawan, Zaki Muhammad Wijaya
{"title":"Isolation and screening of lactic acid bacteria producing <i>anti-Edwardsiella</i> from the gastrointestinal tract of wild catfish (<i>Clarias gariepinus</i>) for probiotic candidates","authors":"Awik P. D. Nurhayati, Enny Zulaika, Muhamad Amin, Edwin Setiawan, Zaki Muhammad Wijaya","doi":"10.1515/opag-2022-0212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Members of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been well known for their antimicrobial activities against various bacterial pathogens in aquaculture species. Thus, the present study aimed at isolating LAB members from the intestinal tract of wild-caught catfish, Clarias gariepinus, and screening them for antimicrobial production against one of the most common bacterial pathogens, Edwardsiella ictaluri . Material and methods LAB were isolated from the intestinal tract of wild catfish caught at the Brantas River, East-Java Indonesia. Then, LAB were screened for antimicrobial activity against E. ictaluri by in vitro assays and further assessed for probiotic candidates. Results A total of 29 LAB were successfully isolated and further screened for anti-edwarsiella activities. Of the 29, six isolates had strong anti-edwardsiella activity (diameter of inhibition zone, &gt;10 mm). Based on their 16 s rRNA gene sequences, these LABs were identified as Lactococcus lactis , Enterococcus hirae , Weissella confusa , Weissella cibaria, and Enterococcus faecalis (two isolates). Further in vitro assays indicated that E. faecalis, L. lactis, W. confusa, and W. cibaria had good viability in the intestinal tract condition, having good adhesion capacity to intestinal mucus, and being harmless to catfish. However, two species ( E. faecalis and W. cibaria ) were resistant to novobiocin and enrofloxacin, respectively. Conclusion Three LAB species ( E. faecalis, L. lactis, and W. confusa ) are potential probiotic candidates in aquaculture to prevent enteric septicemia of catfish disease. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the use of probiotics in vivo .","PeriodicalId":45740,"journal":{"name":"Open Agriculture","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Members of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been well known for their antimicrobial activities against various bacterial pathogens in aquaculture species. Thus, the present study aimed at isolating LAB members from the intestinal tract of wild-caught catfish, Clarias gariepinus, and screening them for antimicrobial production against one of the most common bacterial pathogens, Edwardsiella ictaluri . Material and methods LAB were isolated from the intestinal tract of wild catfish caught at the Brantas River, East-Java Indonesia. Then, LAB were screened for antimicrobial activity against E. ictaluri by in vitro assays and further assessed for probiotic candidates. Results A total of 29 LAB were successfully isolated and further screened for anti-edwarsiella activities. Of the 29, six isolates had strong anti-edwardsiella activity (diameter of inhibition zone, >10 mm). Based on their 16 s rRNA gene sequences, these LABs were identified as Lactococcus lactis , Enterococcus hirae , Weissella confusa , Weissella cibaria, and Enterococcus faecalis (two isolates). Further in vitro assays indicated that E. faecalis, L. lactis, W. confusa, and W. cibaria had good viability in the intestinal tract condition, having good adhesion capacity to intestinal mucus, and being harmless to catfish. However, two species ( E. faecalis and W. cibaria ) were resistant to novobiocin and enrofloxacin, respectively. Conclusion Three LAB species ( E. faecalis, L. lactis, and W. confusa ) are potential probiotic candidates in aquaculture to prevent enteric septicemia of catfish disease. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the use of probiotics in vivo .
野生鲶鱼胃肠道产抗爱德华氏菌乳酸菌的分离与筛选
乳酸菌(lactoacid bacteria, LAB)因其对水产养殖中多种病原菌的抑菌活性而受到广泛关注。因此,本研究旨在从野生捕获的鲶鱼Clarias gariepinus的肠道中分离LAB成员,并筛选它们对最常见的细菌病原体之一爱德华氏菌(Edwardsiella ictaluri)产生抗菌作用。材料和方法从印度尼西亚东爪哇布兰塔斯河捕获的野生鲶鱼肠道中分离出乳酸菌。然后,通过体外实验筛选乳酸菌对伊氏杆菌的抑菌活性,并进一步评估候选益生菌。结果成功分离得到29株乳酸菌,并对其抗伊氏菌活性进行进一步筛选。29株菌株中有6株具有较强的抗爱德华氏菌活性(抑菌带直径约10 mm)。根据其16s rRNA基因序列鉴定为乳酸乳球菌、hirae肠球菌、Weissella confusa、Weissella cibaria和粪肠球菌(两个分离株)。进一步的体外实验表明,粪肠杆菌、乳杆菌、confusa和cibaria在肠道条件下具有良好的生存能力,对肠道粘液有良好的粘附能力,对鲶鱼无害。然而,粪伊蚊和西baria伊蚊对新生物霉素和恩诺沙星分别有耐药。结论粪乳杆菌(E. faecalis)、乳酸乳杆菌(L. lactis)和白乳杆菌(W. confusa)是养殖中预防鲶鱼肠道败血症的潜在益生菌。然而,需要进一步的研究来评估益生菌在体内的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Agriculture
Open Agriculture AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Agriculture is an open access journal that publishes original articles reflecting the latest achievements on agro-ecology, soil science, plant science, horticulture, forestry, wood technology, zootechnics and veterinary medicine, entomology, aquaculture, hydrology, food science, agricultural economics, agricultural engineering, climate-based agriculture, amelioration, social sciences in agriculuture, smart farming technologies, farm management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信