Comparative evaluation of accuracy of different generations of electronic apex locator in determining the correct working length: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Q3 Dentistry
Pooja Sunil Bhagat, Vibha R. Hegde, Sahil Kawle, Pritisha Bharat Jain
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of accuracy of different generations of electronic apex locator in determining the correct working length: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Pooja Sunil Bhagat, Vibha R. Hegde, Sahil Kawle, Pritisha Bharat Jain","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_145_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aim: Different approaches are used to determine the working length of the root canal. The current and most widely researched are the electronic apex locators (EALs). Since the early apex locators were developed in 1942, several generations had their qualities and shortcomings developed. Thus, a comparative evaluation of the accuracy of different generations of EALs in determining the correct working length: Systemic review and meta-analysis to analyze individual studies quantitively and draw conclusions on the best generation of apex locator currently used. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on different electronic databases and by manual search. Studies comparing third and fifth generations with fourth-generation apex locators were subject to strict inclusion criteria followed by data extraction and meta-analysis. Results: Following the meta-analysis, the accuracy is fifth>fourth>third generation of apex locators. Conclusion: Analysis of individual studies quantitatively will give a better understanding of which devices to use to accurately determine the working length.","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_145_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: Different approaches are used to determine the working length of the root canal. The current and most widely researched are the electronic apex locators (EALs). Since the early apex locators were developed in 1942, several generations had their qualities and shortcomings developed. Thus, a comparative evaluation of the accuracy of different generations of EALs in determining the correct working length: Systemic review and meta-analysis to analyze individual studies quantitively and draw conclusions on the best generation of apex locator currently used. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on different electronic databases and by manual search. Studies comparing third and fifth generations with fourth-generation apex locators were subject to strict inclusion criteria followed by data extraction and meta-analysis. Results: Following the meta-analysis, the accuracy is fifth>fourth>third generation of apex locators. Conclusion: Analysis of individual studies quantitatively will give a better understanding of which devices to use to accurately determine the working length.
不同代电子顶点定位器在确定正确工作长度的准确性的比较评价:系统回顾和荟萃分析
摘要目的:确定根管工作长度的方法多种多样。目前研究最广泛的是电子顶点定位器(EALs)。自1942年开发出早期的顶点定位器以来,几代人的优点和缺点都得到了发展。因此,对不同代EALs确定正确工作长度的准确性进行比较评估:系统评价和荟萃分析,定量分析个别研究,得出目前使用的最佳一代顶点定位器的结论。材料与方法:在不同的电子数据库和人工检索中进行了全面的检索。比较第三代、第五代和第四代顶点定位器的研究遵循严格的纳入标准,然后进行数据提取和荟萃分析。结果:经荟萃分析,其准确度为第五代和第三代顶点定位器。结论:对个别研究进行定量分析,可以更好地了解使用哪种设备来准确确定工作长度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endodontology
Endodontology Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信