A comparative evaluation of the effect of various chelating agents on the microhardness of root canal dentin: An in vitro study

Q3 Dentistry
Mineet Kaul, Zinnie Nanda, Kranthikumar Reddy, Rahul Deore, Divya Mandlecha, Esha Jaiswal
{"title":"A comparative evaluation of the effect of various chelating agents on the microhardness of root canal dentin: An in vitro study","authors":"Mineet Kaul, Zinnie Nanda, Kranthikumar Reddy, Rahul Deore, Divya Mandlecha, Esha Jaiswal","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_227_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of 17% liquid ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), 10% citric acid, and 9% 1-hydroxy ethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (HEBP) on the microhardness of root canal dentin. Materials and Methods: Eighteen mandibular premolars which were freshly extracted were selected and randomly assigned to one of the three groups (n = 6). After decoronating, the teeth at the cementoenamel junction, specimens were prepared up to F3 (ProTaper Universal). After each instrument, irrigation was done with 3% sodium hypochlorite. Specimens were sectioned longitudinally to expose dentin surface and mounted on acrylic resin blocks. One half served as the test group and the other served as its control. The dentin was covered with test solutions throughout its length for 5 min. Group 1: 17% liquid EDTA, Group 2: 10% citric acid, and Group 3: 9% HEBP. Measurement of microhardness was done using Vickers indenter at 1000 μm, 1200 μm, 1400 μm from orifice of root canal and 100 μm from pulp-dentin junction, a load of 50 g for 15 s dwell time was applied. A mean of the three readings was used to calculate microhardness. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test at P ≤ 0.05. Results: The mean microhardness of EDTA reduced from 52.28 VHN to 39.00 VHN, and that of citric acid reduced from 52.50 VHN to 47.30 VHN, whereas, HEBP showed least reduction, from 52.46 VHN to 50.52 VHN. Conclusion: A reduction in microhardness was evident on using all three chelating agents. However, HEBP caused the least reduction in microhardness and can be a potential chelating agent for use in endodontics.","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_227_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of 17% liquid ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), 10% citric acid, and 9% 1-hydroxy ethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (HEBP) on the microhardness of root canal dentin. Materials and Methods: Eighteen mandibular premolars which were freshly extracted were selected and randomly assigned to one of the three groups (n = 6). After decoronating, the teeth at the cementoenamel junction, specimens were prepared up to F3 (ProTaper Universal). After each instrument, irrigation was done with 3% sodium hypochlorite. Specimens were sectioned longitudinally to expose dentin surface and mounted on acrylic resin blocks. One half served as the test group and the other served as its control. The dentin was covered with test solutions throughout its length for 5 min. Group 1: 17% liquid EDTA, Group 2: 10% citric acid, and Group 3: 9% HEBP. Measurement of microhardness was done using Vickers indenter at 1000 μm, 1200 μm, 1400 μm from orifice of root canal and 100 μm from pulp-dentin junction, a load of 50 g for 15 s dwell time was applied. A mean of the three readings was used to calculate microhardness. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test at P ≤ 0.05. Results: The mean microhardness of EDTA reduced from 52.28 VHN to 39.00 VHN, and that of citric acid reduced from 52.50 VHN to 47.30 VHN, whereas, HEBP showed least reduction, from 52.46 VHN to 50.52 VHN. Conclusion: A reduction in microhardness was evident on using all three chelating agents. However, HEBP caused the least reduction in microhardness and can be a potential chelating agent for use in endodontics.
不同螯合剂对根管牙本质显微硬度影响的比较评价:体外研究
摘要目的:研究17%液体乙二胺四乙酸酯(EDTA)、10%柠檬酸和9% 1-羟基乙基-1,1-二膦酸酯(HEBP)对根管牙本质显微硬度的影响。材料与方法:选择18颗刚拔除的下颌前磨牙,随机分为3组(n = 6)。在牙釉质-牙釉质交界处进行装饰后,将标本制备至F3 (ProTaper Universal)。每台仪器完成后,用3%次氯酸钠冲洗。纵向切片,暴露牙本质表面,安装在丙烯酸树脂块上。其中一半作为实验组,另一半作为对照组。用测试溶液覆盖牙本质5分钟。第1组:17%液体EDTA,第2组:10%柠檬酸,第3组:9% HEBP。采用维氏压头在距根管孔1000 μm、1200 μm、1400 μm和距牙本质交界处100 μm处测量显微硬度,负载50 g,停留时间15 s。取三个读数的平均值来计算显微硬度。统计学分析采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验,P≤0.05。结果:EDTA的显微硬度由52.28 VHN降至39.00 VHN,柠檬酸的显微硬度由52.50 VHN降至47.30 VHN, HEBP的显微硬度由52.46 VHN降至50.52 VHN。结论:三种螯合剂均能明显降低显微硬度。然而,HEBP引起的显微硬度降低最小,可以作为一种潜在的牙髓学螯合剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endodontology
Endodontology Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信