Ways to Improve the Acceptability of Sentencing Reasoning

Abstract

Argumentation and explanation of the formal and substantive justice of the judgment can now be done using judgment reasoning as a visual language tool. However, it is not difficult to find that the poor reasoning brought on by the reasoning of the lack of acceptability of the problem is more prevalent when assessing the existing status quo of judgment papers. In this regard, the paper suggests enhancing the acceptability of the decision as the legal interpretation as the objective of reasoning orientation, enhancing the ability of judges to safeguard the system, implementing measures to increase their power to do so, and implementing multiple measures to enhance their capacity to interpret the law, with a focus on incentives and forcing and encouraging judges to be motivated by reason. Enhancing the reasons behind the judgment document's Acceptability would also help to strengthen the judiciary's credibility and the nation's sense of security.