The correlation between biomechanical parameters of lower limb and overall risk for diabetic foot ulcer

Q4 Medicine
Snježana Novaković-Bursać, Goran Talić, Nataša Tomić
{"title":"The correlation between biomechanical parameters of lower limb and overall risk for diabetic foot ulcer","authors":"Snježana Novaković-Bursać, Goran Talić, Nataša Tomić","doi":"10.5937/scriptamed54-43321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: Preventing lower limb diabetic complications begins with identifying those at risk for diabetic foot ulceration (DFU). DFU development is related to abnormal pattern of plantar pressure distribution caused by alterations in foot rollover process due to loss of foot-ankle muscular strength, impaired range of motion (ROM) and nervous function, as their integrity is needed to enable proper load absorption on plantar surface. Objective of study was to determine correlation between biomechanical parameters of lower limb: ankle and foot muscle strength, ROM at ankle joint (AJ), subtalar joint (SJ) and first metatarsophalangeal joint (I MTP) and overall risk for DFU assessed by IWGDF 2019 Guidance risk stratification system. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 100 diabetic patients, both types. Patients were classified into 4 DFU risk categories applying IWGDF Guidelines 2019 stratification risk system. Function of ten foot and ankle muscles was evaluated by manual muscle testing applying Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score system and was expressed by muscle score (MS) on dominant leg. ROM at AJ, SJ and I MTP was measured with a goniometer on dominant leg and was expressed by degree (°). Results: Average MS in specified categories were as follows: Category 0: 9.2; Category 1: 13.9; Category 2: 13.3; Category 3: 15.2 and they were significantly different. Average ROM at AJ in specified categories were as follows: Category 0: 49.3°; Category 1: 48.8°; Category 2: 45.5°; Category 3: 44.6° and they were not significantly different. Average ROM at SJ in specified categories were as follows: Category 0: 37.8°; Category 1: 31.3°; Category 2: 35.0°; Category 3: 28.7° and they were significantly different. Average ROM at I MTP in specified categories were as follows: Category 0: 78.60 ; Category 1: 74.4°; Category 2: 65.5°; Category 3: 57.9° and they were significantly different. Conclusions: Risk for DFU ulcer significantly correlates with decreased ankle and foot muscle strength and ROM at SJ and I MTP but does not correlate with ROM at AJ.","PeriodicalId":33497,"journal":{"name":"Scripta Medica","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scripta Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/scriptamed54-43321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim: Preventing lower limb diabetic complications begins with identifying those at risk for diabetic foot ulceration (DFU). DFU development is related to abnormal pattern of plantar pressure distribution caused by alterations in foot rollover process due to loss of foot-ankle muscular strength, impaired range of motion (ROM) and nervous function, as their integrity is needed to enable proper load absorption on plantar surface. Objective of study was to determine correlation between biomechanical parameters of lower limb: ankle and foot muscle strength, ROM at ankle joint (AJ), subtalar joint (SJ) and first metatarsophalangeal joint (I MTP) and overall risk for DFU assessed by IWGDF 2019 Guidance risk stratification system. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 100 diabetic patients, both types. Patients were classified into 4 DFU risk categories applying IWGDF Guidelines 2019 stratification risk system. Function of ten foot and ankle muscles was evaluated by manual muscle testing applying Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score system and was expressed by muscle score (MS) on dominant leg. ROM at AJ, SJ and I MTP was measured with a goniometer on dominant leg and was expressed by degree (°). Results: Average MS in specified categories were as follows: Category 0: 9.2; Category 1: 13.9; Category 2: 13.3; Category 3: 15.2 and they were significantly different. Average ROM at AJ in specified categories were as follows: Category 0: 49.3°; Category 1: 48.8°; Category 2: 45.5°; Category 3: 44.6° and they were not significantly different. Average ROM at SJ in specified categories were as follows: Category 0: 37.8°; Category 1: 31.3°; Category 2: 35.0°; Category 3: 28.7° and they were significantly different. Average ROM at I MTP in specified categories were as follows: Category 0: 78.60 ; Category 1: 74.4°; Category 2: 65.5°; Category 3: 57.9° and they were significantly different. Conclusions: Risk for DFU ulcer significantly correlates with decreased ankle and foot muscle strength and ROM at SJ and I MTP but does not correlate with ROM at AJ.
下肢生物力学参数与糖尿病足溃疡总体风险的相关性研究
背景/目的:预防下肢糖尿病并发症首先要确定糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的高危人群。DFU的发展与足部压力分布的异常模式有关,这是由于足部踝关节肌肉力量丧失、活动范围(ROM)和神经功能受损而导致的足部翻转过程的改变,因为需要它们的完整性才能使足底表面适当地吸收负荷。研究目的是确定下肢生物力学参数:踝关节和足部肌肉力量,踝关节(AJ),距下关节(SJ)和第一跖趾关节(I MTP)的ROM与IWGDF 2019指导风险分层系统评估的DFU总体风险之间的相关性。方法:对100例两型糖尿病患者进行横断面研究。应用IWGDF指南2019分层风险系统将患者分为4个DFU风险类别。采用密歇根糖尿病神经病变评分系统手工肌肉测试评估足部和踝关节肌肉功能,并以主肢肌肉评分(MS)表达。在主腿上用角计测量AJ、SJ和I MTP的ROM,并以度(°)表示。结果:指定分类的平均MS为:0类:9.2;第一类:13.9;第二类:13.3;第3类:15.2,差异有统计学意义。指定类别在AJ时的平均ROM如下:第0类:49.3°;第一类:48.8°;类别2:45.5°;第3类:44.6°,两者无显著差异。指定类别在SJ的平均ROM如下:类别0:37.8°;第一类:31.3°;类别2:35.0°;第3类:28.7°,差异有统计学意义。指定类别在第1 MTP时的平均ROM如下:第0类别:78.60;第一类:74.4°;类别2:65.5°;第3类:57.9°,差异有统计学意义。结论:DFU溃疡的风险与踝关节和足部肌肉力量下降以及SJ和I MTP处的ROM显著相关,但与AJ处的ROM无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信