Digital Resources’ Availability, Usage, and Sufficiency: Insights from Filipino Scientific Literacy Scores

Roberto L. Rodriguez Jr, Marie Grace S. Bulanadi, Adonis P. David
{"title":"Digital Resources’ Availability, Usage, and Sufficiency: Insights from Filipino Scientific Literacy Scores","authors":"Roberto L. Rodriguez Jr, Marie Grace S. Bulanadi, Adonis P. David","doi":"10.54476/apjaet/21358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined how the Filipino science test scores in the Programme for International Student Assessment last 2018 are predicted by (a) gender and type of school as covariates, (b) availability of digital resources in school, and support for teachers’ digital instruction; and (c) availability and sufficiency of digital resources at learner’s home. These objectives are attained by following a descriptive-correlational design that utilized publicly accessible data of the PISA 2018 results on the OECD website. Findings of the regression analysis unveiled that sex did not conclusively predict the scores while learners from private institutions perform better. Additionally, the availability of digital resources in school and their sufficiency at home positively predicted the science scores, whereas the school’s support for teachers’ digital instruction and the availability of digital resources at home negatively predicted science scores. The availability and sufficiency of such digital devices for students at home were seemingly contradicting, hence, requiring further investigation in future studies. Keywords: Filipino learners, OECD, PISA 2018, science achievement, science learning","PeriodicalId":495769,"journal":{"name":"APJAET - Journal ay Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APJAET - Journal ay Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54476/apjaet/21358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined how the Filipino science test scores in the Programme for International Student Assessment last 2018 are predicted by (a) gender and type of school as covariates, (b) availability of digital resources in school, and support for teachers’ digital instruction; and (c) availability and sufficiency of digital resources at learner’s home. These objectives are attained by following a descriptive-correlational design that utilized publicly accessible data of the PISA 2018 results on the OECD website. Findings of the regression analysis unveiled that sex did not conclusively predict the scores while learners from private institutions perform better. Additionally, the availability of digital resources in school and their sufficiency at home positively predicted the science scores, whereas the school’s support for teachers’ digital instruction and the availability of digital resources at home negatively predicted science scores. The availability and sufficiency of such digital devices for students at home were seemingly contradicting, hence, requiring further investigation in future studies. Keywords: Filipino learners, OECD, PISA 2018, science achievement, science learning
数字资源的可用性、使用和充分性:来自菲律宾科学素养分数的见解
本研究考察了2018年国际学生评估计划中菲律宾科学考试成绩是如何通过(a)性别和学校类型作为协变量预测的,(b)学校数字资源的可用性,以及对教师数字教学的支持;(c)学习者家中数字资源的可用性和充分性。这些目标是通过遵循描述性相关设计来实现的,该设计利用了经合组织网站上2018年PISA结果的公开数据。回归分析的结果显示,性别并不能决定性地预测分数,而私立学校的学生表现得更好。此外,学校数字资源的可获得性和家中数字资源的充分性正向预测科学成绩,而学校对教师数字化教学的支持和家中数字资源的可获得性负向预测科学成绩。这些数字设备在学生家中的可用性和充分性似乎是矛盾的,因此,需要在未来的研究中进一步调查。关键词:菲律宾学习者,OECD, PISA 2018,科学成就,科学学习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信