Analysis of reporting system for procedural errors in the endodontics departments of dental institutes of Punjab

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 TROPICAL MEDICINE
Biomedica Pub Date : 2023-06-25 DOI:10.24911/biomedica/5-962
Muhammad Imran Ameer, Zainab Fatima Zaidi, Muhammad Taha Aziz, Hammad Hassan, Muhammad Sannan Qayyum, Sidra Riaz
{"title":"Analysis of reporting system for procedural errors in the endodontics departments of dental institutes of Punjab","authors":"Muhammad Imran Ameer, Zainab Fatima Zaidi, Muhammad Taha Aziz, Hammad Hassan, Muhammad Sannan Qayyum, Sidra Riaz","doi":"10.24911/biomedica/5-962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and Objective:</strong> Procedural error reporting system is an effective step towards patient safety. In Pakistan adverse event reporting system is deficient. The study aimed to identify the presence of procedural error reporting system and their referral in endodontic clinics of private and public dental institutes in Punjab.</p>&#x0D; <p><strong>Methods:</strong> This study was conducted in six private and two public dental institutes in Punjab via questionnaires developed by the authors and distributed online using Google forms. The questionnaire had 14 items targeting demographics, a procedural error reporting system, and ways to manage procedural errors.</p>&#x0D; <p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the dental colleges, both private and public, did not have any procedural error reporting system or a hierarchical order (70.1%) for the management of errors in their endodontic departments (60.5%). The most frequent approach was self-management of errors (86.5%), followed by referring to a senior endodontist (45%) and asking colleagues for help (36.5%). 13% of the respondents never informed patients, while 6% never reported procedural errors to their departments. There was a statistically significant difference between house officers, postgraduate trainees and demonstrators regarding self-management of errors and putting patients on follow-up.</p>&#x0D; <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Most endodontic departments lack a system for reporting procedural errors, with no significant difference between private and public institutes. Most respondents report errors to patients and departments, with self-management being the most common approach. Postgraduate trainees tend to manage errors independently. It is imperative to create a comprehensive error reporting system that could be implemented progressively</p>","PeriodicalId":9186,"journal":{"name":"Biomedica","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24911/biomedica/5-962","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TROPICAL MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective: Procedural error reporting system is an effective step towards patient safety. In Pakistan adverse event reporting system is deficient. The study aimed to identify the presence of procedural error reporting system and their referral in endodontic clinics of private and public dental institutes in Punjab.

Methods: This study was conducted in six private and two public dental institutes in Punjab via questionnaires developed by the authors and distributed online using Google forms. The questionnaire had 14 items targeting demographics, a procedural error reporting system, and ways to manage procedural errors.

Results: The majority of the dental colleges, both private and public, did not have any procedural error reporting system or a hierarchical order (70.1%) for the management of errors in their endodontic departments (60.5%). The most frequent approach was self-management of errors (86.5%), followed by referring to a senior endodontist (45%) and asking colleagues for help (36.5%). 13% of the respondents never informed patients, while 6% never reported procedural errors to their departments. There was a statistically significant difference between house officers, postgraduate trainees and demonstrators regarding self-management of errors and putting patients on follow-up.

Conclusion: Most endodontic departments lack a system for reporting procedural errors, with no significant difference between private and public institutes. Most respondents report errors to patients and departments, with self-management being the most common approach. Postgraduate trainees tend to manage errors independently. It is imperative to create a comprehensive error reporting system that could be implemented progressively

旁遮普牙科医院牙髓科程序差错报告制度分析
< <strong>背景和目标:</strong>程序差错报告制度是保障患者安全的有效措施。在巴基斯坦,不良事件报告系统存在缺陷。本研究旨在确定旁遮普私立和公立牙科机构牙髓门诊存在的程序错误报告系统及其转诊情况。</ & lt; p> & lt; strong>方法:& lt; / strong>这项研究是在旁遮普的六家私立和两家公立牙科机构通过作者开发的问卷调查进行的,并使用谷歌表格在线分发。调查问卷有14个项目,针对人口统计,程序错误报告系统,以及程序错误管理方法。< 结果:绝大多数私立和公立牙科院校(60.5%)牙髓科差错管理未建立程序性差错报告制度或分级管理制度(70.1%)。最常见的方法是自我管理错误(86.5%),其次是咨询资深牙髓医生(45%)和向同事寻求帮助(36.5%)。13%的受访者从未告知患者,而6%的受访者从未向其部门报告程序错误。在错误自我管理和患者随访方面,住院部官员、研究生实习生和示威者之间存在统计学显著差异。</p> & lt; p> & lt; strong>结论:& lt; / strong>大多数牙髓科缺乏程序错误报告制度,私立和公立机构之间没有显著差异。大多数受访者向患者和部门报告错误,自我管理是最常见的方法。研究生实习生倾向于独立处理错误。当务之急是建立一个可以逐步实施的全面的错误报告系统<
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedica
Biomedica 医学-热带医学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomédica is the quarterly journal of the Instituto Nacional de Salud of Colombia [Colombia’s National Health Institute]. Its purpose is to publish the results of original research that contributes meaningfully to knowledge in health and biomedical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信