Geopolitical challenges and the Macedonian path to EU accession

Zhidas Daskalovski
{"title":"Geopolitical challenges and the Macedonian path to EU accession","authors":"Zhidas Daskalovski","doi":"10.2298/medjp2303435d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While formally founded on a variety of values and rules, the enlargement of the European Union (EU) has also been consistently influenced by geopolitical considerations, including within the Western Balkans (WB). The author particularly focuses on the Macedonian case in this regard, observing it in the context of the enlargement policy?s diminished credibility, the lack of progress towards fulfilling membership criteria, and more recently, the complications caused by Russia?s invasion of Ukraine. Apart from the veto imposed by Greece due to the naming dispute (which began in 2005), Skopje?s progress towards EU accession was further hindered by additional challenges related to democratic regression, state capture, and corruption. However, even the change of government and the subsequent conclusion of the Prespa Agreement with Athens in 2018 failed to result in the initiation of EU accession negotiations, which were initially blocked by France and later by Bulgaria. Meanwhile, concerns regarding the high degree of corruption persisted, while Bulgarian bilateral demands became integrated into the broader EU expectations from Skopje. The author concludes that the Macedonian case is characterized by a significant degree of bilateral and geopolitical considerations, further undermining the legitimacy and objectives of the enlargement policy.","PeriodicalId":486727,"journal":{"name":"Međunarodni problemi","volume":"73 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Međunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2303435d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While formally founded on a variety of values and rules, the enlargement of the European Union (EU) has also been consistently influenced by geopolitical considerations, including within the Western Balkans (WB). The author particularly focuses on the Macedonian case in this regard, observing it in the context of the enlargement policy?s diminished credibility, the lack of progress towards fulfilling membership criteria, and more recently, the complications caused by Russia?s invasion of Ukraine. Apart from the veto imposed by Greece due to the naming dispute (which began in 2005), Skopje?s progress towards EU accession was further hindered by additional challenges related to democratic regression, state capture, and corruption. However, even the change of government and the subsequent conclusion of the Prespa Agreement with Athens in 2018 failed to result in the initiation of EU accession negotiations, which were initially blocked by France and later by Bulgaria. Meanwhile, concerns regarding the high degree of corruption persisted, while Bulgarian bilateral demands became integrated into the broader EU expectations from Skopje. The author concludes that the Macedonian case is characterized by a significant degree of bilateral and geopolitical considerations, further undermining the legitimacy and objectives of the enlargement policy.
地缘政治挑战和马其顿加入欧盟之路
欧洲联盟(欧盟)的扩大虽然正式建立在各种价值观和规则的基础上,但也一直受到地缘政治因素的影响,包括在西巴尔干地区。作者在这方面特别着重于马其顿的情况,在扩大政策的背景下观察它。欧盟的信誉下降,在实现成员国标准方面缺乏进展,以及最近俄罗斯引发的复杂局面。美国入侵乌克兰。除了希腊因命名争议(始于2005年)而投下的否决票外,斯科普里?中国加入欧盟的进程进一步受到与民主倒退、国家控制和腐败有关的额外挑战的阻碍。然而,即使是政府更迭以及随后在2018年与雅典达成的《普雷斯帕协定》(Prespa Agreement),也未能启动加入欧盟的谈判,这一谈判最初受到法国和保加利亚的阻挠。与此同时,对高度腐败的担忧持续存在,而保加利亚的双边要求已融入欧盟对斯科普里的更广泛期望。发件人的结论是,马其顿问题的特点是有很大程度的双边和地缘政治考虑,这进一步破坏了扩大政策的合法性和目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信