Enhanced De Facto Constraints Imposed by Non-legally Binding Instruments and Interactions with Normative Environment: An Analysis of the Joint Statements for the Conservation and Management of Japanese Eel Stock

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Kazuki HAGIWARA
{"title":"Enhanced <i>De Facto</i> Constraints Imposed by Non-legally Binding Instruments and Interactions with Normative Environment: An Analysis of the Joint Statements for the Conservation and Management of Japanese Eel Stock","authors":"Kazuki HAGIWARA","doi":"10.1017/s2044251323000425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since 2012, Japan, China, South Korea, and Chinese Taipei have consecutively held informal consultation meetings to discuss the conservation of Japanese eel stock. As a conservation and management measure, these participants adopted the Joint Statement in 2014 to regulate the initial input of Japanese eel seeds into aquaculture ponds. Despite the fact that the input limits were de facto constraints, these measures were implemented as domestic legal regulations in each participant's jurisdiction. This study examines the nature of the de facto constraints imposed by the Joint Statement for conserving and managing Japanese eel stock as a case study of stock regulations. This study further explores the possibilities of strengthening the de facto constraints through interactions with the normative environment; that is, the principle of sustainable development, domestic laws, and the relevant provisions in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).","PeriodicalId":43342,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of International Law","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s2044251323000425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Since 2012, Japan, China, South Korea, and Chinese Taipei have consecutively held informal consultation meetings to discuss the conservation of Japanese eel stock. As a conservation and management measure, these participants adopted the Joint Statement in 2014 to regulate the initial input of Japanese eel seeds into aquaculture ponds. Despite the fact that the input limits were de facto constraints, these measures were implemented as domestic legal regulations in each participant's jurisdiction. This study examines the nature of the de facto constraints imposed by the Joint Statement for conserving and managing Japanese eel stock as a case study of stock regulations. This study further explores the possibilities of strengthening the de facto constraints through interactions with the normative environment; that is, the principle of sustainable development, domestic laws, and the relevant provisions in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
非法律约束文书的事实约束增强及其与规范环境的相互作用——对日本鳗鲡种群养护管理联合声明的分析
自2012年以来,日本、中国、韩国和中国台北连续举行非正式磋商会议,讨论日本鳗鱼种群的保护问题。作为一项保护和管理措施,这些参加国于2014年通过了《联合声明》,以规范日本鳗鲡种子在水产养殖池塘的初始投入。尽管投入限制实际上是限制,但这些措施是作为每个参与国管辖范围内的国内法律法规实施的。本研究审查了《联合声明》对保护和管理日本鳗鱼种群所施加的实际限制的性质,作为种群条例的个案研究。本研究进一步探讨了通过与规范环境的相互作用加强事实约束的可能性;即可持续发展原则、国内法以及《联合国海洋法公约》的有关规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信