Political fragmentation and “The purple zone”: how party fragmentation affects political–administrative relations

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Dag Ingvar Jacobsen
{"title":"Political fragmentation and “The purple zone”: how party fragmentation affects political–administrative relations","authors":"Dag Ingvar Jacobsen","doi":"10.1080/03003930.2023.2264798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A good cooperative relationship between politics and administration is essential to good governance and efficient decision making in public organisations. This study of the cooperative relationship is based on the notion that politics and administration is intertwined, making interaction between politicians and administrators necessary. The study focuses on how political fragmentation affects cooperative relations between politics and administration. Using data from both Norwegian mayors and municipal directors (436 respondents from 303 municipalities), the effects of three different types of political fragmentation are investigated: number of political parties in council and the steering coalition, the Laakso-Taagepera index, and ideological distance between parties. The findings indicate that cooperative relationships get worse with increasing ideological distance and improves with political fragmentation in the council under the conditions of divided government (political parties in the steering coalition spanning both sides of the left–right dimensions). Implications for the study of political–administrative relations are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47564,"journal":{"name":"Local Government Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local Government Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2023.2264798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A good cooperative relationship between politics and administration is essential to good governance and efficient decision making in public organisations. This study of the cooperative relationship is based on the notion that politics and administration is intertwined, making interaction between politicians and administrators necessary. The study focuses on how political fragmentation affects cooperative relations between politics and administration. Using data from both Norwegian mayors and municipal directors (436 respondents from 303 municipalities), the effects of three different types of political fragmentation are investigated: number of political parties in council and the steering coalition, the Laakso-Taagepera index, and ideological distance between parties. The findings indicate that cooperative relationships get worse with increasing ideological distance and improves with political fragmentation in the council under the conditions of divided government (political parties in the steering coalition spanning both sides of the left–right dimensions). Implications for the study of political–administrative relations are discussed.
政治分裂与“紫色地带”:政党分裂如何影响政政关系
政治和行政之间的良好合作关系对于公共组织的良好治理和有效决策至关重要。这种合作关系的研究是基于这样一种观念,即政治和行政是交织在一起的,因此政治家和行政人员之间的互动是必要的。研究的重点是政治碎片化如何影响政治与行政的合作关系。利用来自挪威市长和市政主管(来自303个城市的436名受访者)的数据,研究了三种不同类型的政治分裂的影响:议会中的政党数量和指导联盟,laakso - taagpera指数,以及政党之间的意识形态距离。研究结果表明,合作关系随着意识形态距离的增加而恶化,而在分裂政府(执政联盟中的政党跨越左右两个维度)的情况下,合作关系随着委员会的政治分裂而改善。讨论了政治-行政关系研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Local Government Studies is the leading journal for the study of local politics, policy, public administration and management and governance. First established in 1975, it is an influential forum for critical dialogue and exchange on local government and a vital resource for academics, politicians, policy makers and practitioners internationally. The editors welcome submissions in this field, particularly work of a comparative, methodologically innovative and theoretically challenging nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信