An Economic Perspective of the Justice Digitalisation Process: The Questions of Efficiency and Equity

José Manuel Castillo López
{"title":"An Economic Perspective of the Justice Digitalisation Process: The Questions of Efficiency and Equity","authors":"José Manuel Castillo López","doi":"10.30958/ajl.9-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The general problems of the Judicial Administrations in Europe, and particularly in Spain, are profound and diverse, but perhaps the most relevant and evident are the time delay in legal resolutions and the influence of economic conditions of users both regarding simple access to the Judicial Administration and in the very sense or result of different legal proceedings. In fact, one of the most serious deficiencies of the Spanish public administration is the notable opacity or scarce transparency for citizens and, as a result of this, the high level of corruption and the unequally distributed benefits thereof. This situation is of course transferred to the Judicial Administration, judges, lawyers and procuradors (formal representatives before the courts) via private proceedings. The digitalisation process of the Judicial Administration is bringing with it perceivable changes in the efficiency of the system, deriving from better access to information on legal proceedings on the part of citizens, deemed on the whole to be positive and, deriving from it, improvements in the functioning of the economic model. Nevertheless, on the side of iniquity as regards access to justice and legal resolutions, the “inequality of arms”, the available predictions and studies are inconclusive, putting forward, furthermore, serious concerns regarding the effect on legal guarantees and the right to honour and privacy of citizens. In this study, which is interdisciplinary in nature, I preferentially use the perspective and instruments of the Economic Analysis of Law to address and substantiate the aforementioned questions.The processes of digitalisation and artificial intelligence are topics of scientific, professional and popular relevance, particularly in the Judicial Administration. They are in reality complex matters and in my judgement are not being produced with the required rigour, at least in the public and private professional Judicial Administration sphere, not even in the terms and denominations employed, nor in the correlative concepts they seek to reflect. In this essay, after briefly analysing the starting premise and presenting the institutional framework in which these processes and correlative debates are taking place, I shall put forward a taxonomic proposal. I shall then analyse the effects it has on the efficiency and equity of the legal system and with a general reflection on the role of algorithms and artificial intelligence in modern society. I shall end with the diverse challenges that are being considered and the preventions that should be put in place prior to the application of the innovations in question. Keywords: corruption; digitalisation; efficiency; equity; Judicial System","PeriodicalId":184533,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.9-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The general problems of the Judicial Administrations in Europe, and particularly in Spain, are profound and diverse, but perhaps the most relevant and evident are the time delay in legal resolutions and the influence of economic conditions of users both regarding simple access to the Judicial Administration and in the very sense or result of different legal proceedings. In fact, one of the most serious deficiencies of the Spanish public administration is the notable opacity or scarce transparency for citizens and, as a result of this, the high level of corruption and the unequally distributed benefits thereof. This situation is of course transferred to the Judicial Administration, judges, lawyers and procuradors (formal representatives before the courts) via private proceedings. The digitalisation process of the Judicial Administration is bringing with it perceivable changes in the efficiency of the system, deriving from better access to information on legal proceedings on the part of citizens, deemed on the whole to be positive and, deriving from it, improvements in the functioning of the economic model. Nevertheless, on the side of iniquity as regards access to justice and legal resolutions, the “inequality of arms”, the available predictions and studies are inconclusive, putting forward, furthermore, serious concerns regarding the effect on legal guarantees and the right to honour and privacy of citizens. In this study, which is interdisciplinary in nature, I preferentially use the perspective and instruments of the Economic Analysis of Law to address and substantiate the aforementioned questions.The processes of digitalisation and artificial intelligence are topics of scientific, professional and popular relevance, particularly in the Judicial Administration. They are in reality complex matters and in my judgement are not being produced with the required rigour, at least in the public and private professional Judicial Administration sphere, not even in the terms and denominations employed, nor in the correlative concepts they seek to reflect. In this essay, after briefly analysing the starting premise and presenting the institutional framework in which these processes and correlative debates are taking place, I shall put forward a taxonomic proposal. I shall then analyse the effects it has on the efficiency and equity of the legal system and with a general reflection on the role of algorithms and artificial intelligence in modern society. I shall end with the diverse challenges that are being considered and the preventions that should be put in place prior to the application of the innovations in question. Keywords: corruption; digitalisation; efficiency; equity; Judicial System
司法数字化进程的经济学视角:效率与公平问题
在欧洲,特别是在西班牙,司法行政部门的一般问题是深刻和多样的,但最相关和最明显的问题可能是法律决议的时间延迟,以及用户在简单进入司法行政部门以及在不同法律程序的意义或结果方面的经济条件的影响。事实上,西班牙公共行政最严重的缺陷之一是对公民的明显不透明或缺乏透明度,其结果是严重的腐败及其利益分配不均。这种情况当然通过非公开诉讼转交给司法行政部门、法官、律师和检察官(法院的正式代表)。司法行政的数字化进程带来了系统效率的明显变化,这源于公民更好地获取法律诉讼信息,总体上被认为是积极的,并由此改善了经济模式的运作。然而,在诉诸司法和法律决议、“武器不平等”的不公正方面,现有的预测和研究是不确定的,此外,对法律保障、公民的荣誉权和隐私权的影响提出了严重关切。在这项跨学科性质的研究中,我优先使用法律经济分析的视角和工具来解决和证实上述问题。数字化和人工智能进程是科学、专业和大众相关的主题,特别是在司法行政领域。它们实际上是复杂的问题,据我判断,至少在公共和私人专业司法行政领域,甚至在它们所使用的术语和名称,以及它们试图反映的相关概念方面,都没有以所需的严谨性提出。在本文中,在简要分析了开始的前提,并介绍了这些过程和相关辩论发生的制度框架之后,我将提出一个分类学建议。然后,我将分析它对法律体系的效率和公平性的影响,并对算法和人工智能在现代社会中的作用进行总体反思。最后,我要谈谈正在审议的各种挑战以及在应用有关创新之前应该采取的预防措施。关键词:腐败;数字化;效率;股本;司法系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信