Airborne Radar Doppler Spectrum Width as a Scale-Dependent Turbulence Metric

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, OCEAN
Adam Majewski, Jeffrey R. French, Samuel Haimov
{"title":"Airborne Radar Doppler Spectrum Width as a Scale-Dependent Turbulence Metric","authors":"Adam Majewski, Jeffrey R. French, Samuel Haimov","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-23-0056.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract High resolution airborne cloud Doppler radars such as the W-Band Wyoming Cloud Radar (WCR) have, since the 1990s, investigated cloud microphysical, kinematic, and precipitation structures down to 30-m resolution. These measurements revolutionized our understanding of fine-scale cloud structure and the scales at which cloud processes occur. Airborne cloud Doppler radars may also resolve cloud turbulent eddy structure directly at 10-meter scales. To date, cloud turbulence has been examined as variances (Schwartz et al. 2019) and dissipation rates (Strauss et al. 2015) at coarser resolution than individual pulse volumes. The present work advances the potential of near-vertical pulse pair Doppler spectrum width as a metric for turbulent air motion. Doppler spectrum width has long been used to investigate turbulent motions from ground-based remote sensors. However, complexities of airborne Doppler radar and spectral broadening resulting from platform and hydrometeor motions have limited airborne radar spectrum width measurements to qualitative interpretation only. Here we present the first quantitative validation of spectrum width from an airborne cloud radar. Echoes with signal-to-noise ratio greater than 10 dB yield spectrum width values that strongly correlate with retrieved mean Doppler variance for a range of non-convective cloud conditions. Further, Doppler spectrum width within turbulent regions of cloud also shows good agreement with in-situ eddy dissipation rate (EDR) and gust probe variance. However, the use of pulse pair estimated spectrum width as a metric for turbulent air motion intensity is only suitable for turbulent air motions more energetic than the magnitude of spectral broadening, estimated to be < 0.4 m s −1 for the WCR in these cases.","PeriodicalId":15074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-23-0056.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract High resolution airborne cloud Doppler radars such as the W-Band Wyoming Cloud Radar (WCR) have, since the 1990s, investigated cloud microphysical, kinematic, and precipitation structures down to 30-m resolution. These measurements revolutionized our understanding of fine-scale cloud structure and the scales at which cloud processes occur. Airborne cloud Doppler radars may also resolve cloud turbulent eddy structure directly at 10-meter scales. To date, cloud turbulence has been examined as variances (Schwartz et al. 2019) and dissipation rates (Strauss et al. 2015) at coarser resolution than individual pulse volumes. The present work advances the potential of near-vertical pulse pair Doppler spectrum width as a metric for turbulent air motion. Doppler spectrum width has long been used to investigate turbulent motions from ground-based remote sensors. However, complexities of airborne Doppler radar and spectral broadening resulting from platform and hydrometeor motions have limited airborne radar spectrum width measurements to qualitative interpretation only. Here we present the first quantitative validation of spectrum width from an airborne cloud radar. Echoes with signal-to-noise ratio greater than 10 dB yield spectrum width values that strongly correlate with retrieved mean Doppler variance for a range of non-convective cloud conditions. Further, Doppler spectrum width within turbulent regions of cloud also shows good agreement with in-situ eddy dissipation rate (EDR) and gust probe variance. However, the use of pulse pair estimated spectrum width as a metric for turbulent air motion intensity is only suitable for turbulent air motions more energetic than the magnitude of spectral broadening, estimated to be < 0.4 m s −1 for the WCR in these cases.
机载雷达多普勒频谱宽度作为尺度相关的湍流度量
自20世纪90年代以来,高分辨率机载云多普勒雷达,如w波段怀俄明云雷达(WCR),已经研究了低至30米分辨率的云微物理、运动学和降水结构。这些测量彻底改变了我们对精细尺度云结构和云过程发生的尺度的理解。机载云多普勒雷达也可以直接在10米尺度上分辨云湍流涡结构。迄今为止,云湍流已经以比单个脉冲体积更粗的分辨率作为方差(Schwartz等人,2019)和耗散率(Strauss等人,2015)进行了研究。本工作提出了近垂直脉冲对多普勒频谱宽度作为湍流空气运动度量的潜力。多普勒频谱宽度长期以来一直用于研究地面遥感器的湍流运动。然而,机载多普勒雷达的复杂性以及平台和水流星运动导致的频谱加宽限制了机载雷达频谱宽度测量只能定性解释。在这里,我们提出了从机载云雷达光谱宽度的第一个定量验证。信噪比大于10 dB的回波产生的频谱宽度值与非对流云条件下检索到的平均多普勒方差密切相关。云湍流区的多普勒谱宽与原位涡耗散率(EDR)和阵风探测方差吻合较好。然而,使用脉冲对估计谱宽作为湍流空气运动强度的度量只适用于比谱宽幅度更有能量的湍流空气运动,估计为<在这些情况下,WCR为0.4 m s−1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology (JTECH) publishes research describing instrumentation and methods used in atmospheric and oceanic research, including remote sensing instruments; measurements, validation, and data analysis techniques from satellites, aircraft, balloons, and surface-based platforms; in situ instruments, measurements, and methods for data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation and assimilation in numerical models; and information systems and algorithms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信