Comparative Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Sectors: Looking Back and Looking Forward

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Helmut K. Anheier
{"title":"Comparative Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Sectors: Looking Back and Looking Forward","authors":"Helmut K. Anheier","doi":"10.1007/s11266-023-00608-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While comparative research on nonprofit organizations has made much progress since the launch of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project in 1990, there now seems to be a loss of momentum. Some of the reasons for this have to do with aspects of definition, classification, and aggregation that can be corrected. The main issue, however, is the lack of progress in advancing comparative nonprofit sector theories beyond the social origins theory. To remedy this, the essay proposes four ways forward as part of a new research agenda.","PeriodicalId":48082,"journal":{"name":"Voluntas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voluntas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00608-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract While comparative research on nonprofit organizations has made much progress since the launch of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project in 1990, there now seems to be a loss of momentum. Some of the reasons for this have to do with aspects of definition, classification, and aggregation that can be corrected. The main issue, however, is the lack of progress in advancing comparative nonprofit sector theories beyond the social origins theory. To remedy this, the essay proposes four ways forward as part of a new research agenda.
非营利组织与行业比较研究:回顾与展望
自1990年约翰霍普金斯大学非营利部门比较项目启动以来,非营利组织的比较研究取得了很大进展,但目前似乎势头有所减弱。造成这种情况的一些原因与可以纠正的定义、分类和聚合方面有关。然而,主要的问题是,在推动比较非营利部门理论超越社会起源理论方面缺乏进展。为了弥补这一点,本文提出了作为新研究议程一部分的四种前进方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Voluntas
Voluntas SOCIAL ISSUES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Society for Third-Sector Research, Voluntas is an interdisciplinary international journal that aims to be the central forum for worldwide research in the area between the state, market, and household sectors. The journal combines full-length articles with shorter research notes (reflecting the latest developments in the field) and book reviews. Voluntas is essential reading for all those engaged in research into the Third Sector (voluntary and nonprofit organizations) including economists, lawyers, political scientists, psychologists, sociologists, and social and public policy analysts. It aims to present leading-edge academic argument around civil society issues in a style that is accessible to practitioners and policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信