Evaluation of fibrinogen function by CFF-A10 in cardiac surgery

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Signa Vitae Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22514/sv.2023.072
{"title":"Evaluation of fibrinogen function by CFF-A10 in cardiac surgery","authors":"","doi":"10.22514/sv.2023.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fibrinogen function is evaluated as the maximum amplitude (MA) of the citrated functional fibrinogen (CFF) assay in TEG6s®, however, CFF-MA requires a long time to obtain results. CFF-A10 (10-minute value), allowing more rapid decisions, however, no studies have evaluated the correlation between CFF-A10 levels and fibrinogen concentration. This study aimed to assess the correlation between CFF-A10 and blood fibrinogen levels measured using the dry hematology method after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). This retrospective study was conducted in a single university hospital and enrolled 192 patients of all ages who underwent cardiovascular surgery with CPB between 01 March 2020, and 05 November 2021. CFF-A10 and CFF-MA levels were measured using the TEG6s® global hemostasis assay, and blood fibrinogen levels were measured using the Fibcare® DRIHEMATO Fib-HSII after CPB. Simple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between TEG6s® parameters and fibrinogen concentration. Furthermore, the patients were classified into four groups based on the cut-off values of fibrinogen at 150 mg/dL and CFF-A10, and the background factors for each group were analyzed. CFF-A10 and blood fibrinogen levels were correlated by linear regression (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.37), similar to CFF-MA and fibrinogen levels (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.40). The optimal cut-off value, which maximizes the sensitivity and specificity, of CFF-A10 for predicting low fibrinogen levels below 150 mg/dL, was 8.4 mm, with a sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 67.9%; that of CFF-MA was 9.2 mm, with a sensitivity of 76.3% and specificity of 69.8%. Despite sufficient blood fibrinogen levels, patients with low CFF-A10 levels experienced more postoperative bleeding. CFF-A10 predicted fibrinogen loss faster and with the same accuracy as CFF-MA did. Low CFF-A10 levels, despite sufficient fibrinogen levels, may be associated with increased blood loss following CPB.","PeriodicalId":49522,"journal":{"name":"Signa Vitae","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signa Vitae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2023.072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fibrinogen function is evaluated as the maximum amplitude (MA) of the citrated functional fibrinogen (CFF) assay in TEG6s®, however, CFF-MA requires a long time to obtain results. CFF-A10 (10-minute value), allowing more rapid decisions, however, no studies have evaluated the correlation between CFF-A10 levels and fibrinogen concentration. This study aimed to assess the correlation between CFF-A10 and blood fibrinogen levels measured using the dry hematology method after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). This retrospective study was conducted in a single university hospital and enrolled 192 patients of all ages who underwent cardiovascular surgery with CPB between 01 March 2020, and 05 November 2021. CFF-A10 and CFF-MA levels were measured using the TEG6s® global hemostasis assay, and blood fibrinogen levels were measured using the Fibcare® DRIHEMATO Fib-HSII after CPB. Simple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between TEG6s® parameters and fibrinogen concentration. Furthermore, the patients were classified into four groups based on the cut-off values of fibrinogen at 150 mg/dL and CFF-A10, and the background factors for each group were analyzed. CFF-A10 and blood fibrinogen levels were correlated by linear regression (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.37), similar to CFF-MA and fibrinogen levels (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.40). The optimal cut-off value, which maximizes the sensitivity and specificity, of CFF-A10 for predicting low fibrinogen levels below 150 mg/dL, was 8.4 mm, with a sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 67.9%; that of CFF-MA was 9.2 mm, with a sensitivity of 76.3% and specificity of 69.8%. Despite sufficient blood fibrinogen levels, patients with low CFF-A10 levels experienced more postoperative bleeding. CFF-A10 predicted fibrinogen loss faster and with the same accuracy as CFF-MA did. Low CFF-A10 levels, despite sufficient fibrinogen levels, may be associated with increased blood loss following CPB.
心脏手术中纤维蛋白原功能的CFF-A10评价
纤维蛋白原功能是通过TEG6s®中柠檬酸功能纤维蛋白原(CFF)测定的最大振幅(MA)来评估的,然而,CFF-MA需要很长时间才能获得结果。CFF-A10(10分钟值),允许更快速的决策,然而,没有研究评估CFF-A10水平与纤维蛋白原浓度之间的相关性。本研究旨在评估体外循环(CPB)术后干血液学法测定的CFF-A10与血纤维蛋白原水平的相关性。这项回顾性研究在一家大学医院进行,纳入了192名在2020年3月1日至2021年11月5日期间接受心血管手术的CPB患者。CFF-A10和CFF-MA水平采用TEG6s®全血止血法测定,CPB后采用Fibcare®DRIHEMATO Fib-HSII测定血纤维蛋白原水平。采用简单线性回归分析评价TEG6s®参数与纤维蛋白原浓度的关系。根据纤维蛋白原150 mg/dL和CFF-A10的临界值将患者分为4组,分析每组患者的背景因素。CFF-A10与血纤维蛋白原水平线性回归相关(p <0.0001, R2 = 0.37),与CFF-MA和纤维蛋白原水平相似(p <0.0001, r2 = 0.40)。CFF-A10预测低纤维蛋白原水平低于150 mg/dL的最佳临界值为8.4 mm,敏感性为80.7%,特异性为67.9%;CFF-MA的最佳临界值为9.2 mm,敏感性为76.3%,特异性为69.8%。尽管血液纤维蛋白原水平充足,但CFF-A10水平较低的患者术后出血较多。CFF-A10预测纤维蛋白原损失的速度更快,准确度与CFF-MA相同。低CFF-A10水平,尽管有足够的纤维蛋白原水平,可能与CPB后失血增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Signa Vitae
Signa Vitae 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Signa Vitae is a completely open-access,peer-reviewed journal dedicate to deliver the leading edge research in anaesthesia, intensive care and emergency medicine to publics. The journal’s intention is to be practice-oriented, so we focus on the clinical practice and fundamental understanding of adult, pediatric and neonatal intensive care, as well as anesthesia and emergency medicine. Although Signa Vitae is primarily a clinical journal, we welcome submissions of basic science papers if the authors can demonstrate their clinical relevance. The Signa Vitae journal encourages scientists and academicians all around the world to share their original writings in the form of original research, review, mini-review, systematic review, short communication, case report, letter to the editor, commentary, rapid report, news and views, as well as meeting report. Full texts of all published articles, can be downloaded for free from our web site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信