Чагатайские и тимуридские панцирные нарукавья последней трети XIV – начала XVI в. и их дериваты

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Leonid A. Bobrov
{"title":"Чагатайские и тимуридские панцирные нарукавья последней трети XIV – начала XVI в. и их дериваты","authors":"Leonid A. Bobrov","doi":"10.22162/2619-0990-2023-67-3-464-482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article deals with plated (lamellar) armguards (‘oversleeves’) used by warriors of the Chagatai Ulus and the Timurid Empire. Goals. The study aims to identify key trends in the evolution of plated armguards across the Chagatai Ulus, the empire of Amir Timur, and the Timurid states in the late 14th to early 16th centuries. Results. The study reveals oversleeve-type armguards were not that rare and exotic in the then armour patterns as is sometimes believed, and for several centuries the former successfully competed with vambraces and other armour elements supposed to protect shoulders and forearms. In a historical perspective, the late medieval armguards proved somewhat manifested optimization and modernization of the imperial-era ‘Genghisid’ armour from the 13th and 14th centuries. The High and Late Middle Ages, as well as early modern times, witnessed the use of segmented armguards by armoured warriors across Southern Siberia, West, Central, South, and mainland East Asia. However, evolutionary trends were distinguished by certain specifics in different regions. Such armguards existed mainly in the mid-14th to early 16th centuries. The oversleeve-type armguards were evolutionarily drifting toward the optimization of plate embedding patterns (belts be replaced by rivets), as well as a gradual increase in the elasticity of this armour element via plate size reduction. The latter made it possible to place plates in several rows and expand the protected area up to the wrist. The final stage in the development of such plated armguards across the Muslim East was mail and plate ‘sleeves’. Segmented armguards could be worn with body armour characterized by different plate embedding structures (i.e., plates riveted, sewn, laced or connected with pieces of chainmail, as well as onto chainmail only). The main consumers of long plated oversleeve-type armguards in troops of Timur and Timurids were representatives of the nobility and line officers. Conclusions. The plated armguards were left behind by Central Asian communities as a result of transformed local military traditions in the aftermath of the collapse of the Timurid states in the early 16th century.","PeriodicalId":36786,"journal":{"name":"Oriental Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oriental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-67-3-464-482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. The article deals with plated (lamellar) armguards (‘oversleeves’) used by warriors of the Chagatai Ulus and the Timurid Empire. Goals. The study aims to identify key trends in the evolution of plated armguards across the Chagatai Ulus, the empire of Amir Timur, and the Timurid states in the late 14th to early 16th centuries. Results. The study reveals oversleeve-type armguards were not that rare and exotic in the then armour patterns as is sometimes believed, and for several centuries the former successfully competed with vambraces and other armour elements supposed to protect shoulders and forearms. In a historical perspective, the late medieval armguards proved somewhat manifested optimization and modernization of the imperial-era ‘Genghisid’ armour from the 13th and 14th centuries. The High and Late Middle Ages, as well as early modern times, witnessed the use of segmented armguards by armoured warriors across Southern Siberia, West, Central, South, and mainland East Asia. However, evolutionary trends were distinguished by certain specifics in different regions. Such armguards existed mainly in the mid-14th to early 16th centuries. The oversleeve-type armguards were evolutionarily drifting toward the optimization of plate embedding patterns (belts be replaced by rivets), as well as a gradual increase in the elasticity of this armour element via plate size reduction. The latter made it possible to place plates in several rows and expand the protected area up to the wrist. The final stage in the development of such plated armguards across the Muslim East was mail and plate ‘sleeves’. Segmented armguards could be worn with body armour characterized by different plate embedding structures (i.e., plates riveted, sewn, laced or connected with pieces of chainmail, as well as onto chainmail only). The main consumers of long plated oversleeve-type armguards in troops of Timur and Timurids were representatives of the nobility and line officers. Conclusions. The plated armguards were left behind by Central Asian communities as a result of transformed local military traditions in the aftermath of the collapse of the Timurid states in the early 16th century.
查加泰和提穆里底亚甲壳类动物的臂章,最后三分之一到16世纪初。
介绍。这篇文章讨论了Chagatai Ulus和帖木儿帝国的战士使用的镀金(片状)护手(' overleeves ')。的目标。这项研究的目的是确定14世纪末到16世纪初,在查合台乌鲁斯、阿米尔·帖木儿帝国和帖木儿国家中,镀银护臂演变的关键趋势。结果。研究表明,在当时的盔甲图案中,过袖式护手并不像人们有时认为的那样罕见和奇特,几个世纪以来,前袖式护手成功地与肩带和其他保护肩膀和前臂的装甲元素竞争。从历史的角度来看,中世纪晚期的护手在某种程度上体现了13世纪和14世纪帝国时代“成吉思汗”盔甲的优化和现代化。中世纪鼎盛和晚期,以及近代早期,在西伯利亚南部、西部、中部、南部和东亚大陆的装甲战士使用了分段护手。然而,在不同的地区,进化趋势是由某些特定的特征来区分的。这种护手主要存在于14世纪中期到16世纪早期。套筒式护臂逐渐向嵌板模式的优化方向发展(用铆钉代替皮带),并通过减小护板尺寸逐渐增加装甲元件的弹性。后者使得将钢板放置在几排并将保护区域扩大到手腕成为可能。这种镀银护臂在穆斯林东部发展的最后阶段是盔甲和钢板“袖子”。分段式护臂可以与具有不同嵌板结构的防弹衣一起佩戴(即,钢板铆接、缝制、系带或与锁甲片连接,以及仅与锁甲片连接)。在帖木儿和帖木儿的军队中,长镀袖式护手的主要消费者是贵族和一线军官的代表。结论。16世纪早期帖木儿国家崩溃后,中亚社区改变了当地的军事传统,留下了镀金的护手。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oriental Studies
Oriental Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信