Accounting for Within-Species Variation in Continuous Trait Evolution on a Phylogenetic Network

Benjamin Teo, Jeffrey Rose, Paul Bastide, Cécile Ané
{"title":"Accounting for Within-Species Variation in Continuous Trait Evolution on a Phylogenetic Network","authors":"Benjamin Teo, Jeffrey Rose, Paul Bastide, Cécile Ané","doi":"10.18061/bssb.v2i3.8977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within-species trait variation may be the result of genetic variation, environmental variation, or measurement error, for example. In phylogenetic comparative studies, failing to account for within-species variation has many adverse effects, such as increased error in testing hypotheses about evolutionary correlations, biased estimates of evolutionary rates, and inaccurate inference of the mode of evolution. These adverse effects were demonstrated in studies that considered a tree-like underlying phylogeny. Comparative methods on phylogenetic networks are still in their infancy. The impact of within-species variation on network-based methods has not been studied. Here, we introduce a phylogenetic linear model in which the phylogeny can be a network to account for within-species variation in the continuous response trait assuming equal within-species variances across species. We show how inference based on the individual values can be reduced to a problem using species-level summaries, even when the within-species variance is estimated. Our method performs well under various simulation settings and is robust when within-species variances are unequal across species. When phenotypic (within-species) correlations differ from evolutionary (between-species) correlations, estimates of evolutionary coefficients are pulled towards the phenotypic coefficients for all methods we tested. Also, evolutionary rates are either underestimated or overestimated, depending on the mismatch between phenotypic and evolutionary relationships. We applied our method to morphological and geographical data from Polemonium. We find a strong negative correlation of leaflet size with elevation, despite a positive correlation within species. Our method can explore the role of gene flow in trait evolution by comparing the fit of a network to that of a tree. We find marginal evidence for leaflet size being affected by gene flow and support for previous observations on the challenges of using individual continuous traits to infer inheritance weights at reticulations. Our method is freely available in the Julia package PhyloNetworks.","PeriodicalId":476538,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Society of Systematic Biologists","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Society of Systematic Biologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/bssb.v2i3.8977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within-species trait variation may be the result of genetic variation, environmental variation, or measurement error, for example. In phylogenetic comparative studies, failing to account for within-species variation has many adverse effects, such as increased error in testing hypotheses about evolutionary correlations, biased estimates of evolutionary rates, and inaccurate inference of the mode of evolution. These adverse effects were demonstrated in studies that considered a tree-like underlying phylogeny. Comparative methods on phylogenetic networks are still in their infancy. The impact of within-species variation on network-based methods has not been studied. Here, we introduce a phylogenetic linear model in which the phylogeny can be a network to account for within-species variation in the continuous response trait assuming equal within-species variances across species. We show how inference based on the individual values can be reduced to a problem using species-level summaries, even when the within-species variance is estimated. Our method performs well under various simulation settings and is robust when within-species variances are unequal across species. When phenotypic (within-species) correlations differ from evolutionary (between-species) correlations, estimates of evolutionary coefficients are pulled towards the phenotypic coefficients for all methods we tested. Also, evolutionary rates are either underestimated or overestimated, depending on the mismatch between phenotypic and evolutionary relationships. We applied our method to morphological and geographical data from Polemonium. We find a strong negative correlation of leaflet size with elevation, despite a positive correlation within species. Our method can explore the role of gene flow in trait evolution by comparing the fit of a network to that of a tree. We find marginal evidence for leaflet size being affected by gene flow and support for previous observations on the challenges of using individual continuous traits to infer inheritance weights at reticulations. Our method is freely available in the Julia package PhyloNetworks.
在系统发育网络上解释连续性状进化中的种内变异
例如,种内性状变异可能是遗传变异、环境变异或测量误差的结果。在系统发育比较研究中,未能解释物种内变异会产生许多不利影响,例如,在测试关于进化相关性的假设时误差增加,对进化速率的估计有偏差,以及对进化模式的推断不准确。这些不利影响在考虑树状潜在系统发育的研究中得到证实。系统发育网络的比较方法仍处于起步阶段。种内变异对基于网络的方法的影响尚未得到研究。在这里,我们引入了一个系统发育线性模型,在该模型中,系统发育可以作为一个网络来解释连续响应特性的种内变化,假设种内差异在物种之间相等。我们展示了基于个体值的推理如何使用物种级别的总结来简化为一个问题,即使在估计物种内方差的情况下也是如此。我们的方法在各种模拟设置下都表现良好,并且在种内差异不相等时具有鲁棒性。当表型(种内)相关性与进化(种间)相关性不同时,我们测试的所有方法的进化系数估计值都被拉向表型系数。此外,进化速率要么被低估,要么被高估,这取决于表型和进化关系之间的不匹配。我们将我们的方法应用于Polemonium的形态和地理数据。我们发现小叶大小与海拔高度呈强烈的负相关,尽管在物种内呈正相关。我们的方法可以通过比较网络和树的拟合来探索基因流在性状进化中的作用。我们发现小叶大小受基因流影响的边缘证据,并支持先前使用个体连续性状来推断网状遗传权重的挑战的观察。我们的方法可以在Julia包PhyloNetworks中免费获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信