Dynamic Strength Index in Basketball Players: Age and Position Differences, Seasonal Variation and Association with Sprinting and Change of Direction Performance

Jernej Pleša, Filip Ujaković, Chris Bishop, Žiga Kozinc, Nejc Šarabon
{"title":"Dynamic Strength Index in Basketball Players: Age and Position Differences, Seasonal Variation and Association with Sprinting and Change of Direction Performance","authors":"Jernej Pleša, Filip Ujaković, Chris Bishop, Žiga Kozinc, Nejc Šarabon","doi":"10.1007/s42978-023-00244-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in bilateral and unilateral dynamic strength index (DSI) between age categories (seniors and juniors), player positions (guards and forwards), its variation during the basketball season, and its association with sprint and change of direction (CoD) performance. Highly trained basketball players ( n = 32) performed bilateral and unilateral countermovement jumps (CMJ), bilateral and unilateral isometric squats, 10-m sprint, and 505 CoD test. DSI was calculated from CMJ and isometric peak force, while 10-m sprint and 505 test were used to calculate the CoD deficit. Two-way factorial analysis showed larger isometric peak force in seniors, and larger bilateral DSI in juniors, while guards had higher DSI values and larger peak force in both metrics compared to forwards. Two-way mixed model ANOVA showed a significant increase in unilateral isometric squat and CMJ peak force force ( g = –0.08 to –0.64) and increase in bilateral DSI values. Post-hoc analysis showed that isometric squat force significantly increased only in seniors ( g = 0.88), resulting in decreased bilateral DSI values ( g = 0.52), with bilateral and unilateral DSI values increasing in juniors. Similar trends were observed in guards and forwards, with guards exhibiting a more pronounced increase in all variables compared to forwards. Furthermore, correlation analysis for in-season testing showed moderate associations between isometric squat peak force and CoD ability ( r = –0.43 to –0.54; P < 0.001), and weak associations between DSI and CoD ability ( r = 0.36 to 0.39; P < 0.05), while associations were not significant for sprint performance. The relationships were lower or absent during pre-season testing. Further interventional studies are needed to determine the usefulness of DSI to guide training related decision-making.","PeriodicalId":73941,"journal":{"name":"Journal of science in sport and exercise","volume":"47 22","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of science in sport and exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-023-00244-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in bilateral and unilateral dynamic strength index (DSI) between age categories (seniors and juniors), player positions (guards and forwards), its variation during the basketball season, and its association with sprint and change of direction (CoD) performance. Highly trained basketball players ( n = 32) performed bilateral and unilateral countermovement jumps (CMJ), bilateral and unilateral isometric squats, 10-m sprint, and 505 CoD test. DSI was calculated from CMJ and isometric peak force, while 10-m sprint and 505 test were used to calculate the CoD deficit. Two-way factorial analysis showed larger isometric peak force in seniors, and larger bilateral DSI in juniors, while guards had higher DSI values and larger peak force in both metrics compared to forwards. Two-way mixed model ANOVA showed a significant increase in unilateral isometric squat and CMJ peak force force ( g = –0.08 to –0.64) and increase in bilateral DSI values. Post-hoc analysis showed that isometric squat force significantly increased only in seniors ( g = 0.88), resulting in decreased bilateral DSI values ( g = 0.52), with bilateral and unilateral DSI values increasing in juniors. Similar trends were observed in guards and forwards, with guards exhibiting a more pronounced increase in all variables compared to forwards. Furthermore, correlation analysis for in-season testing showed moderate associations between isometric squat peak force and CoD ability ( r = –0.43 to –0.54; P < 0.001), and weak associations between DSI and CoD ability ( r = 0.36 to 0.39; P < 0.05), while associations were not significant for sprint performance. The relationships were lower or absent during pre-season testing. Further interventional studies are needed to determine the usefulness of DSI to guide training related decision-making.
篮球运动员动态力量指数:年龄、位置差异、季节变化及其与短跑和方向变化的关系
摘要本研究旨在探讨篮球运动员的双侧和单侧动态力量指数(DSI)在不同年龄组别(高年级和低年级)、不同位置(后卫和前锋)之间的差异及其在赛季中的变化,以及DSI与冲刺和方向改变(CoD)表现的关系。训练有素的篮球运动员(n = 32)进行了双侧和单侧反动作跳跃(CMJ)、双侧和单侧等长深蹲、10米短跑和505 CoD测试。DSI由CMJ和等长峰值力计算,10米冲刺和505试验计算CoD赤字。双向因子分析显示,与前锋相比,老年人的等长峰值力更大,青少年的双侧DSI更大,而后卫的DSI值和两项指标的峰值力都更高。双向混合模型方差分析显示,单侧等距深蹲和CMJ峰值力(g = -0.08至-0.64)显著增加,双侧DSI值显著增加。事后分析显示,等距深蹲力仅在老年人中显著增加(g = 0.88),导致双侧DSI值下降(g = 0.52),而在青少年中双侧和单侧DSI值增加。后卫和前锋也出现了类似的趋势,与前锋相比,后卫在所有变量上都表现出更明显的增长。此外,季节测试的相关分析显示,等距深蹲峰值力与CoD能力之间存在中度相关性(r = -0.43 ~ -0.54;P & lt;0.001), DSI和CoD能力之间存在弱相关性(r = 0.36 ~ 0.39;P & lt;0.05),而与短跑成绩的相关性不显著。在季前测试中,这种关系较低或不存在。需要进一步的介入研究来确定DSI对指导培训相关决策的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信