Fictions of depersonalization: inauthentic feeling at the fin-de-siècle

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Josh Powell
{"title":"Fictions of depersonalization: inauthentic feeling at the <i>fin-de-siècle</i>","authors":"Josh Powell","doi":"10.1080/08905495.2023.2273176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For Stephen, feeling and emotion have their proper place (largely in the private, domestic realm); he is worried that they are beginning to exert too much influence outside of this, “in literature, in politics, in religion” (1864, 74). It’s hard to ignore the gendered aspect of Stephen’s argument here. He is clearly suggesting the “injurious” repercussions of female influence on “robust” male culture and this culture’s inevitable effeminization.2 See Mayer (Citation2008) on scientific experimentation and Kehler (Citation2008) on class. Elsewhere, Furneaux (Citation2016) has written on the role emotions played in the construction of Victorian masculinity. On sentiment and emotion in relation to empire, see recent studies by Lewis (Citation2018) and Lydon (Citation2020).3 It was Mary Augusta Ward who translated Amiel’s original French coinage, dépersonnalisé, into “depersonalized”, now the accepted English term.4 Philip Gerrans (Citation2019), for example, draws on Dugas’s work when formulating an affect-based model of selfhood. For Gerrans, “the self to which experience is attributed is a predictive model made by the mind to explain the modulation of affect as the organism progresses through the world” (401). The self, here, is constructed through an accumulation of “characteristic” affective responses to perceptions and thoughts; depersonalization, the feeling that one is “no longer present in experience”, emerges when familiar perceptions and thoughts fail to produce the characteristic affective responses that are expected (401).5 There has been some discussion of literary writing’s connection with depersonalization. Simeon and Abugel (Citation2006) devote a chapter of their book on depersonalization to literary representations of the phenomenon. And Francis (Citation2022) has recently considered depersonalization in relation to creative writing. These works, though, do not consider nineteenth-century literature.7 In their introduction to Moore (Citation2007), Heilman and Llewellyn note that the “aesthetic tastes, sexual oddities and nervous condition of Moore’s spectator protagonist [Norton] are transparently adapted from his reading of Joris-Karl Huysmans, Walter Pater and Arthur Schopenhauer” (I).6 Early in the story Norton’s mother and Kitty’s father agree that Norton is “quite different” from other men with regards to his disinterest in women (119). He also stumbles into his engagement with Kitty through a moment of uncontrolled passion and, just before the tramp’s attack hopes that an “accident might lead him out of the difficulty into which a chance moment had betrayed him” (151).8 In contemporary psychiatry, Depersonalization Disorder is commonly defined as a type of dissociation, related to but distinct from other dissociative disorders such as what we now call Dissociative Identity Disorder (previously multiple personality disorder) (Simeon and Abugel Citation2006, 73).9 I have focused here on “Mildred Lawson”, but, in the collection’s final story, John Norton’s sense of being “far away” is echoed by Agnes Lahren as she comes out of a convent and is initiated into the decadent society of her mother: She tells her downtrodden father, “I shall never get on in society. I cannot, father, dear, I cannot, I feel so far away; I do not know what to say to the people I meet. I do not feel that I understand them when they speak to me: I am far away, that is what I feel; I shall never get over that feeling” (2007, 192).10 The story has frequently been discussed in relation to the New Woman novel, see Saudo-Welby (Citation2014)11 See Jadwin (Citation1992) for a discussion of this figure in Vanity Fair.12 “She must succeed. Success meant so much. If she succeeded, she would be spoken of in the newspapers, and, best of all, she would hear people say when she came into a room, ‘That is Mildred Lawson … ’” (Moore Citation2007, 40).13 In an early review of Celibates, Harry Thurston Peck (1895) opined that the “character of Mildred Lawson suggests a curious blend of Becky Sharpe [sic] and [another of Thackeray’s women] Blanche Amory” (quoted in Moore 2014, 215).14 “It is as though Teiresias who alone kept his true life in unsubstantial Hades, should at last feel himself dream into a shade” (Myers Citation1886, 654).15 See Carel (Citation2016)16 See Tanner (Citation2003)Additional informationNotes on contributorsJosh PowellJosh Powell is a Lecturer in the English Literature department at Cardiff University. His doctoral thesis focused on Samuel Beckett’s relationship with experimental psychology, and a monograph based on this project was published in January 2020, as part of Bloomsbury’s Historicizing Modernism series. He has recently published articles on the work of Ann Quin, and Philip Roth.","PeriodicalId":43278,"journal":{"name":"Nineteenth-Century Contexts-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"21 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nineteenth-Century Contexts-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08905495.2023.2273176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For Stephen, feeling and emotion have their proper place (largely in the private, domestic realm); he is worried that they are beginning to exert too much influence outside of this, “in literature, in politics, in religion” (1864, 74). It’s hard to ignore the gendered aspect of Stephen’s argument here. He is clearly suggesting the “injurious” repercussions of female influence on “robust” male culture and this culture’s inevitable effeminization.2 See Mayer (Citation2008) on scientific experimentation and Kehler (Citation2008) on class. Elsewhere, Furneaux (Citation2016) has written on the role emotions played in the construction of Victorian masculinity. On sentiment and emotion in relation to empire, see recent studies by Lewis (Citation2018) and Lydon (Citation2020).3 It was Mary Augusta Ward who translated Amiel’s original French coinage, dépersonnalisé, into “depersonalized”, now the accepted English term.4 Philip Gerrans (Citation2019), for example, draws on Dugas’s work when formulating an affect-based model of selfhood. For Gerrans, “the self to which experience is attributed is a predictive model made by the mind to explain the modulation of affect as the organism progresses through the world” (401). The self, here, is constructed through an accumulation of “characteristic” affective responses to perceptions and thoughts; depersonalization, the feeling that one is “no longer present in experience”, emerges when familiar perceptions and thoughts fail to produce the characteristic affective responses that are expected (401).5 There has been some discussion of literary writing’s connection with depersonalization. Simeon and Abugel (Citation2006) devote a chapter of their book on depersonalization to literary representations of the phenomenon. And Francis (Citation2022) has recently considered depersonalization in relation to creative writing. These works, though, do not consider nineteenth-century literature.7 In their introduction to Moore (Citation2007), Heilman and Llewellyn note that the “aesthetic tastes, sexual oddities and nervous condition of Moore’s spectator protagonist [Norton] are transparently adapted from his reading of Joris-Karl Huysmans, Walter Pater and Arthur Schopenhauer” (I).6 Early in the story Norton’s mother and Kitty’s father agree that Norton is “quite different” from other men with regards to his disinterest in women (119). He also stumbles into his engagement with Kitty through a moment of uncontrolled passion and, just before the tramp’s attack hopes that an “accident might lead him out of the difficulty into which a chance moment had betrayed him” (151).8 In contemporary psychiatry, Depersonalization Disorder is commonly defined as a type of dissociation, related to but distinct from other dissociative disorders such as what we now call Dissociative Identity Disorder (previously multiple personality disorder) (Simeon and Abugel Citation2006, 73).9 I have focused here on “Mildred Lawson”, but, in the collection’s final story, John Norton’s sense of being “far away” is echoed by Agnes Lahren as she comes out of a convent and is initiated into the decadent society of her mother: She tells her downtrodden father, “I shall never get on in society. I cannot, father, dear, I cannot, I feel so far away; I do not know what to say to the people I meet. I do not feel that I understand them when they speak to me: I am far away, that is what I feel; I shall never get over that feeling” (2007, 192).10 The story has frequently been discussed in relation to the New Woman novel, see Saudo-Welby (Citation2014)11 See Jadwin (Citation1992) for a discussion of this figure in Vanity Fair.12 “She must succeed. Success meant so much. If she succeeded, she would be spoken of in the newspapers, and, best of all, she would hear people say when she came into a room, ‘That is Mildred Lawson … ’” (Moore Citation2007, 40).13 In an early review of Celibates, Harry Thurston Peck (1895) opined that the “character of Mildred Lawson suggests a curious blend of Becky Sharpe [sic] and [another of Thackeray’s women] Blanche Amory” (quoted in Moore 2014, 215).14 “It is as though Teiresias who alone kept his true life in unsubstantial Hades, should at last feel himself dream into a shade” (Myers Citation1886, 654).15 See Carel (Citation2016)16 See Tanner (Citation2003)Additional informationNotes on contributorsJosh PowellJosh Powell is a Lecturer in the English Literature department at Cardiff University. His doctoral thesis focused on Samuel Beckett’s relationship with experimental psychology, and a monograph based on this project was published in January 2020, as part of Bloomsbury’s Historicizing Modernism series. He has recently published articles on the work of Ann Quin, and Philip Roth.
去人格化的虚构:最后一刻的不真实感觉
点击放大图片点击缩小图片披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。注1:对斯蒂芬来说,感觉和情感有其应有的地位(主要是在私人的、家庭的领域);他担心他们开始在“文学、政治、宗教”之外施加太多影响(1864,74)。我们很难忽视斯蒂芬观点中的性别因素。他清楚地表明,女性影响对“强健”的男性文化的“有害”影响,以及这种文化不可避免的女性化参见Mayer (Citation2008)关于科学实验和Kehler (Citation2008)关于课堂。在其他地方,Furneaux (Citation2016)写了关于情感在维多利亚时代男性气质的建构中所扮演的角色。关于情感和情感与帝国的关系,参见Lewis (Citation2018)和Lydon (Citation2020)最近的研究玛丽·奥古斯塔·沃德(Mary Augusta Ward)将艾米尔最初的法语词汇d personnalis翻译成了“去个人化”,现在已被英语所接受例如,菲利普·格伦斯(Citation2019)在构建基于情感的自我模型时借鉴了杜加斯的研究成果。对格伦斯来说,“经验所归属的自我是一种由大脑创造的预测模型,用来解释随着有机体在世界上的发展,情感的调节”(401)。在这里,自我是通过对感知和思想的“特征”情感反应的积累而构建的;当熟悉的感知和想法无法产生预期的特征情感反应时,人格解体,即一个人“不再存在于经验中”的感觉就会出现(401)关于文学写作与去人格化的关系,已经有了一些讨论。Simeon和Abugel (Citation2006)在他们关于去人格化的书中用了一章来描述这种现象的文学表现。弗朗西斯(Citation2022)最近考虑了与创意写作有关的去人格化。然而,这些作品并没有考虑到19世纪的文学在他们对摩尔的介绍中(Citation2007), Heilman和Llewellyn注意到“摩尔的观众主角(诺顿)的审美品味、性怪癖和神经状态明显地改编自他对Joris-Karl Huysmans、Walter Pater和Arthur Schopenhauer的阅读”(I)在故事的早期,诺顿的母亲和基蒂的父亲一致认为,诺顿对女人不感兴趣,这一点与其他男人“完全不同”(119)。他还因为一时无法控制的激情而与基蒂订婚,就在流浪汉袭击他之前,他希望“偶然的机会能把他从背叛他的困境中解救出来”(151)在当代精神病学中,人格解体障碍通常被定义为一种分离,与我们现在所说的分离性身份障碍(以前的多重人格障碍)等其他分离性障碍相关,但又不同(Simeon and Abugel citation, 2006,73)我在这里主要讲的是《米尔德里德·劳森》,但在这部小说的最后一个故事中,约翰·诺顿的“遥远”感在阿格尼斯·拉伦身上得到了呼应,她从修道院出来,进入了她母亲的颓废社会:她告诉她受压迫的父亲,“我在社会上永远不会有立足之处。”我做不到,爸爸,亲爱的,我做不到,我觉得那么遥远;我不知道该对我遇到的人说什么。他们对我说话的时候,我觉得自己听不懂。我离得很远,这就是我的感觉。我永远也忘不了那种感觉”(2007,192)这个故事经常被与新女性小说联系在一起讨论,见Saudo-Welby (Citation2014)11见Jadwin (Citation1992)对《名利场》中这个人物的讨论。成功意味着很多。如果她成功了,她就会出现在报纸上,最重要的是,当她走进一个房间时,她会听到人们说:“这是米尔德里德·劳森……””(摩尔引文2007,40)在对《独身者》的早期评论中,哈里·瑟斯顿·派克(1895)认为“米尔德里德·劳森的角色是贝基·夏普(原文如此)和[萨克雷笔下的另一个女人]布兰奇·阿莫里的奇怪混合体”(引用于摩尔2014年,215)“就好像在虚无缥缈的冥界中独自度过自己真实生活的泰瑞西亚斯,最终应该感到自己的梦境变成了阴影”(Myers Citation1886, 654)参见Carel (Citation2016)16参见Tanner (Citation2003)附加信息撰稿人说明josh Powell josh Powell是卡迪夫大学英国文学系的讲师。他的博士论文集中在塞缪尔·贝克特与实验心理学的关系,并基于这个项目的专著于2020年1月出版,作为布卢姆斯伯里的历史化现代主义系列的一部分。他最近发表了关于安·奎因和菲利普·罗斯的文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Nineteenth-Century Contexts is committed to interdisciplinary recuperations of “new” nineteenth centuries and their relation to contemporary geopolitical developments. The journal challenges traditional modes of categorizing the nineteenth century by forging innovative contextualizations across a wide spectrum of nineteenth century experience and the critical disciplines that examine it. Articles not only integrate theories and methods of various fields of inquiry — art, history, musicology, anthropology, literary criticism, religious studies, social history, economics, popular culture studies, and the history of science, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信