Before The War on Cancer

IF 0.4 Q4 COMMUNICATION
David Cantor
{"title":"Before The War on Cancer","authors":"David Cantor","doi":"10.1080/13688804.2023.2277261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis paper explores how gangsters and cancers came to be metaphors of bodily and social disorder, beginning in a media world dominated by print, radio and film and ending in a world where television had come to displace older forms of mass communication. It is a study of the continuities and discontinuities between concerns about television and earlier forms of mass media, and how they shaped the trajectories of the two metaphors of cancer and the gangster. Indeed, I suggest that in the case of these metaphors, anxieties about whether print, film, and radio were polluting or purifying were later extended and adapted to television, and may have contributed to the different fates of the two metaphors. The metaphor of the gangster as applied to cancer faded from public view in the 1970s, while the metaphor of cancer applied to gangsterism seems to have had a longer life.KEYWORDS: Gangsterscancertelevisionfilmmetaphor AcknowledgementsEarly versions of this paper were presented at two meetings: ‘The Visual Culture of Medicine and its Objects,’ held at the Riggs Library, Georgetown University, 23 September 2014 and ‘Locating Medical Television. The Televisual Spaces of Medicine and Health in the 20th Century,’ held online, 11–13 November 2020. I thank participants at these meetings and Philipp Stiasny, Alex Mold, and the anonymous referee for their helpful comments on later drafts.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Douglas, Purity and Danger.2 For a portrayal of cancer as a sign of the moral corruption of the gangster: Shadoian, Dreams & Dead Ends, 162 and 207.3 Agnew, “Ecologies of Cancer Rhetoric.” See also Bourke, Fear, 300. Aronowitz, Unnatural History, 163.4 This paper has relied on a variety of digital and paper sources to identify the life of the metaphors of cancer and the gangster. Digital sources include various databases of historical newspapers, books, and television programs that allow word searches for variants of ‘gang’ and ‘cancer.’ These have been supplemented with searches in traditional archives, especially those of cancer organizations, and corpuses of cancer educational and gangster films. A full list of these archives and databases is available from the author.5 “Public Enemy Number 2.” “Public Enemy No. 2.” Facts Forum News. 5, no. 12, December 1956: 14–15 and 44–6. “Public Enemy Number 1.” Rock Island Lines News Digest. 7, no. 4, April 1948: 10. “The Scratchpad Man.” “Zanesville Fights Cancer.” The Rotarian, 73, no. 5, November 1948: 32–3, 32.6 Exceptions prior to 1930 include Edwin Newdick, “The Gang Factories.” New York Tribune, August 31, 1913: B1–B2 at B2; Hadley, Sinister Shadows, 321. McKinley, Crime and the Civic Cancer. For the post-1930s see: W.A.S. Douglas, “Chicago Crime Parley Called by Civic Group.” Baltimore Sun, June 15, 1930: 1.; “Russell’s Fate Up to ‘Big 4’.” Chicago Daily Tribune, June 15, 1930: 1 and 10, 10; “Dinner Honors Union Chieftain. Predicts Labor Will Rid itself of Gang Cancer.” Chicago Daily Tribune, May 17, 1940: 5; “Mayor Leads Drive to Rid City of Gangs That Prey on Trade.” New York Times, June 26, 1931: 1 and 4 at 4; “Federal Men Get Results.” New York Times, August 23, 1931: 2.7 Osgood Nichols, “Sleuths Track Their Man.” Washington Post, September 16, 1934: SM5 and SM18 at SM5.8 “Hitler and Stalin Likened to Capone and Pendergast.” Los Angeles Times. November 3, 1939: 3. See also Hadley, Sinister Shadows, 321.9 “Charges Cancer Body Gangster.” Spokane Daily Chronicle, November 16, 1931: 7.10 Powers, G-Men.11 Sklar, City Boys, 8.12 “Intelligence”; “Is Cancer Education Effective?”; Bluestone, “Importance of Cancer Education”; Lakeman, “Cancer Education”; Little, “How to Educate Women”; Rigney, “Does Medical Publicity Work.”13 Muriel Fleming, “Demonstration Health Talk.” The Ministry 17, no. 1, January 1944: 32–3. “Cancer, ‘Gangster’ of Disease, Can Be Cured, Is Message.” Milwaukee News-Sentinel, 13, April 1941: 10-A; Time Is Life; Battle Against Cancer. On films see Cantor, “Choosing to Live.”14 Ruth, Inventing the Public Enemy, 2–3.15 Isaac F. Marcosson, “Cancer the Fifth Column Disease.” New Yorker 16, no. 2, 1940: 9.16 Adair, “Science Mobilizes,” 678.17 Novak, “Cancer,” 820.18 Clarence C. Little, “Milking the Public. A General of the Cancer Fighters Answers the March Article on Milk.” Coronet Magazine, May 2, 1937: 23–9 at 23.19 Proctor, Cancer Wars.20 Marcosson, “Cancer the Fifth Column Disease,” 9.21 Mrs. John F. Tims, Jr., in Mobilization of World's Cancer Experts, 112.22 Schrecker, Many Are the Crimes, 144.23 Krahn, Educational Film Guide, 425. For the uses of the “Traitor Within” metaphor see Woglom, “Critique of Tumor Resistance,” 284; and National Broadcasting Company, The Traitor Within.24 Hazam, “Stop that Gangster,” 5.25 Martinez, Man in Nature, 45.26 Ibid., 299.27 Cantor, “Before Survivorship”; Cantor, “Choosing to Live.”28 Gilbert, A Cycle of Outrage; Graebner, Coming of Age in Buffalo.29 Alton L. Blakeslee, “Story of Cancer Fight Told in Biological ‘Gangster’ Film.” Oakland Tribune. April 2, 1950: 22-A.30 Pickett, “Where Do We Stand with Cancer?” 22.31 Spencer, “The Problems,” 509.32 Spencer, “Meaning of Cancer Research,” 1362. See also Johnson, Facing the Facts, 6.33 “Color TV Destroys Reading Like Cancer Wastes a Body.” Lincoln Journal Star (Nebraska), December 29, 1975: 9.34 United States. Congress. Senate. 83rd Congress, A368–9 at A369. More generally on Italian American responses to the ethnic portrayal of gangsters see Bernstein, Greatest Menace.35 Kefauver, Crime in America, 2.36 Boddy, “Approaching ‘The Untouchables’”; Vahimagi, The Untouchables; Wilson, “Gang Busters”; Bernstein, The Greatest Menace, 61–83.37 American Cancer Society, Annual Report 1950, 15.38 On The Traitor Within, 1946 see “Philadelphia Cancer Television Programs.” Cancer News, May 1947: 12. “Cancer Movie Televised Recently in Chicago by AMA and Illinois Group.” Cancer News, February 1948: 11; “How to Tell Neighbors.” For other television plays see “Volunteer Actors … ” “‘Variety’”; American Cancer Society, Annual Report 1956, 27; “Cancer Quackery.” Signals. [ACS] Public Education Newsletter. 1, no. 1. August 1957: 4; “The Charlatan.” Signals. [ACS] Public Education Newsletter, 1, no. 1. August 1957: 4.39 Emil Corwin, “Tactic.” Cancer News 13, no. 3, Summer 1959: 9–12.40 “Television ‘Eyes’.”41 “Radio and TV Material.”42 The Man on the Other Side of the Desk.43 Combating Heart Disease, 255.44 Bernstein, Greatest Menace; Allsop, The Bootleggers, 379.45 James W. Barton, “How Breast Cancer Spreads.” The News (Newport, R. I.), January 31, 1956: 13.46 Davenport and Lloyd, How Public Policy Became War.47 For an introduction to the vast literature on The Godfather see Browne, Francis Ford Coppola’s.48 Howell, History of Street Gangs.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDavid CantorDavid Cantor, Centro de Investigaciones Sociales (CIS), Instituto de Desarrollo Económico y Social (IDES), Aráoz 2838, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1425 DGT, Argentina; School of Public Health, University of Maryland, 4200 Valley Drive, Suite 2242, College Park, MD 20742-2611, USA. E-mail: djcantor@hotmail.com","PeriodicalId":44733,"journal":{"name":"Media History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2023.2277261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis paper explores how gangsters and cancers came to be metaphors of bodily and social disorder, beginning in a media world dominated by print, radio and film and ending in a world where television had come to displace older forms of mass communication. It is a study of the continuities and discontinuities between concerns about television and earlier forms of mass media, and how they shaped the trajectories of the two metaphors of cancer and the gangster. Indeed, I suggest that in the case of these metaphors, anxieties about whether print, film, and radio were polluting or purifying were later extended and adapted to television, and may have contributed to the different fates of the two metaphors. The metaphor of the gangster as applied to cancer faded from public view in the 1970s, while the metaphor of cancer applied to gangsterism seems to have had a longer life.KEYWORDS: Gangsterscancertelevisionfilmmetaphor AcknowledgementsEarly versions of this paper were presented at two meetings: ‘The Visual Culture of Medicine and its Objects,’ held at the Riggs Library, Georgetown University, 23 September 2014 and ‘Locating Medical Television. The Televisual Spaces of Medicine and Health in the 20th Century,’ held online, 11–13 November 2020. I thank participants at these meetings and Philipp Stiasny, Alex Mold, and the anonymous referee for their helpful comments on later drafts.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Douglas, Purity and Danger.2 For a portrayal of cancer as a sign of the moral corruption of the gangster: Shadoian, Dreams & Dead Ends, 162 and 207.3 Agnew, “Ecologies of Cancer Rhetoric.” See also Bourke, Fear, 300. Aronowitz, Unnatural History, 163.4 This paper has relied on a variety of digital and paper sources to identify the life of the metaphors of cancer and the gangster. Digital sources include various databases of historical newspapers, books, and television programs that allow word searches for variants of ‘gang’ and ‘cancer.’ These have been supplemented with searches in traditional archives, especially those of cancer organizations, and corpuses of cancer educational and gangster films. A full list of these archives and databases is available from the author.5 “Public Enemy Number 2.” “Public Enemy No. 2.” Facts Forum News. 5, no. 12, December 1956: 14–15 and 44–6. “Public Enemy Number 1.” Rock Island Lines News Digest. 7, no. 4, April 1948: 10. “The Scratchpad Man.” “Zanesville Fights Cancer.” The Rotarian, 73, no. 5, November 1948: 32–3, 32.6 Exceptions prior to 1930 include Edwin Newdick, “The Gang Factories.” New York Tribune, August 31, 1913: B1–B2 at B2; Hadley, Sinister Shadows, 321. McKinley, Crime and the Civic Cancer. For the post-1930s see: W.A.S. Douglas, “Chicago Crime Parley Called by Civic Group.” Baltimore Sun, June 15, 1930: 1.; “Russell’s Fate Up to ‘Big 4’.” Chicago Daily Tribune, June 15, 1930: 1 and 10, 10; “Dinner Honors Union Chieftain. Predicts Labor Will Rid itself of Gang Cancer.” Chicago Daily Tribune, May 17, 1940: 5; “Mayor Leads Drive to Rid City of Gangs That Prey on Trade.” New York Times, June 26, 1931: 1 and 4 at 4; “Federal Men Get Results.” New York Times, August 23, 1931: 2.7 Osgood Nichols, “Sleuths Track Their Man.” Washington Post, September 16, 1934: SM5 and SM18 at SM5.8 “Hitler and Stalin Likened to Capone and Pendergast.” Los Angeles Times. November 3, 1939: 3. See also Hadley, Sinister Shadows, 321.9 “Charges Cancer Body Gangster.” Spokane Daily Chronicle, November 16, 1931: 7.10 Powers, G-Men.11 Sklar, City Boys, 8.12 “Intelligence”; “Is Cancer Education Effective?”; Bluestone, “Importance of Cancer Education”; Lakeman, “Cancer Education”; Little, “How to Educate Women”; Rigney, “Does Medical Publicity Work.”13 Muriel Fleming, “Demonstration Health Talk.” The Ministry 17, no. 1, January 1944: 32–3. “Cancer, ‘Gangster’ of Disease, Can Be Cured, Is Message.” Milwaukee News-Sentinel, 13, April 1941: 10-A; Time Is Life; Battle Against Cancer. On films see Cantor, “Choosing to Live.”14 Ruth, Inventing the Public Enemy, 2–3.15 Isaac F. Marcosson, “Cancer the Fifth Column Disease.” New Yorker 16, no. 2, 1940: 9.16 Adair, “Science Mobilizes,” 678.17 Novak, “Cancer,” 820.18 Clarence C. Little, “Milking the Public. A General of the Cancer Fighters Answers the March Article on Milk.” Coronet Magazine, May 2, 1937: 23–9 at 23.19 Proctor, Cancer Wars.20 Marcosson, “Cancer the Fifth Column Disease,” 9.21 Mrs. John F. Tims, Jr., in Mobilization of World's Cancer Experts, 112.22 Schrecker, Many Are the Crimes, 144.23 Krahn, Educational Film Guide, 425. For the uses of the “Traitor Within” metaphor see Woglom, “Critique of Tumor Resistance,” 284; and National Broadcasting Company, The Traitor Within.24 Hazam, “Stop that Gangster,” 5.25 Martinez, Man in Nature, 45.26 Ibid., 299.27 Cantor, “Before Survivorship”; Cantor, “Choosing to Live.”28 Gilbert, A Cycle of Outrage; Graebner, Coming of Age in Buffalo.29 Alton L. Blakeslee, “Story of Cancer Fight Told in Biological ‘Gangster’ Film.” Oakland Tribune. April 2, 1950: 22-A.30 Pickett, “Where Do We Stand with Cancer?” 22.31 Spencer, “The Problems,” 509.32 Spencer, “Meaning of Cancer Research,” 1362. See also Johnson, Facing the Facts, 6.33 “Color TV Destroys Reading Like Cancer Wastes a Body.” Lincoln Journal Star (Nebraska), December 29, 1975: 9.34 United States. Congress. Senate. 83rd Congress, A368–9 at A369. More generally on Italian American responses to the ethnic portrayal of gangsters see Bernstein, Greatest Menace.35 Kefauver, Crime in America, 2.36 Boddy, “Approaching ‘The Untouchables’”; Vahimagi, The Untouchables; Wilson, “Gang Busters”; Bernstein, The Greatest Menace, 61–83.37 American Cancer Society, Annual Report 1950, 15.38 On The Traitor Within, 1946 see “Philadelphia Cancer Television Programs.” Cancer News, May 1947: 12. “Cancer Movie Televised Recently in Chicago by AMA and Illinois Group.” Cancer News, February 1948: 11; “How to Tell Neighbors.” For other television plays see “Volunteer Actors … ” “‘Variety’”; American Cancer Society, Annual Report 1956, 27; “Cancer Quackery.” Signals. [ACS] Public Education Newsletter. 1, no. 1. August 1957: 4; “The Charlatan.” Signals. [ACS] Public Education Newsletter, 1, no. 1. August 1957: 4.39 Emil Corwin, “Tactic.” Cancer News 13, no. 3, Summer 1959: 9–12.40 “Television ‘Eyes’.”41 “Radio and TV Material.”42 The Man on the Other Side of the Desk.43 Combating Heart Disease, 255.44 Bernstein, Greatest Menace; Allsop, The Bootleggers, 379.45 James W. Barton, “How Breast Cancer Spreads.” The News (Newport, R. I.), January 31, 1956: 13.46 Davenport and Lloyd, How Public Policy Became War.47 For an introduction to the vast literature on The Godfather see Browne, Francis Ford Coppola’s.48 Howell, History of Street Gangs.Additional informationNotes on contributorsDavid CantorDavid Cantor, Centro de Investigaciones Sociales (CIS), Instituto de Desarrollo Económico y Social (IDES), Aráoz 2838, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1425 DGT, Argentina; School of Public Health, University of Maryland, 4200 Valley Drive, Suite 2242, College Park, MD 20742-2611, USA. E-mail: djcantor@hotmail.com
在向癌症宣战之前
摘要本文探讨了黑帮和癌症如何成为身体和社会混乱的隐喻,从一个由印刷、广播和电影主导的媒体世界开始,到一个电视取代旧的大众传播形式的世界结束。它研究了对电视和早期大众媒体形式的关注之间的连续性和不连续性,以及它们如何塑造癌症和黑帮这两个隐喻的轨迹。的确,我认为,在这些隐喻的例子中,关于印刷、电影和广播是污染还是净化的焦虑后来扩展并适应了电视,这可能导致了这两个隐喻的不同命运。20世纪70年代,将癌症比喻为“黑帮”的比喻逐渐淡出了人们的视线,而将癌症比喻为“黑帮”的比喻似乎更长久一些。本文的早期版本在两个会议上发表:“医学的视觉文化及其对象”,于2014年9月23日在乔治城大学里格斯图书馆举行,以及“定位医学电视”。“20世纪医学与卫生的电视空间”,2020年11月11日至13日在线举行。我感谢这些会议的参与者,以及Philipp Stiasny、Alex Mold和匿名推荐人对后来的草稿提供的有益意见。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。1道格拉斯,《纯洁与危险》2把癌症描绘成黑帮道德败坏的标志:影子,《梦想与死胡同》,162和203阿格纽,《癌症修辞的生态学》参见伯克,《恐惧》,300页。Aronowitz,《非自然历史》,163.4 .这篇论文依靠各种数字和纸张来源来识别癌症和黑帮隐喻的生活。数字资源包括各种历史报纸、书籍和电视节目的数据库,可以搜索“gang”和“cancer”的变体。此外,他们还查阅了传统档案,尤其是癌症组织的档案,以及癌症教育和黑帮电影的资料库。这些档案和数据库的完整列表可从作者处获得“公敌二号。“2号公敌。”《事实论坛新闻》第5期。1956年12月12日:14-15和44-6。“头号公敌。”Rock Island Lines News Digest,第7期。1948年4月4日:10。“挠痒痒的人。“赞斯维尔与癌症搏斗。”扶轮社员,73岁,不。1930年之前的例外包括埃德温·纽迪克的《黑帮工厂》。《纽约论坛报》1913年8月31日:B1-B2在B2;哈德利,险恶的阴影,321。麦金利,犯罪和公民癌症。关于20世纪30年代后的作品,请参阅W.A.S.道格拉斯的《公民团体召集的芝加哥犯罪谈判》。巴尔的摩太阳报,1930年6月15日:1;"罗素的命运取决于'四大' "《芝加哥论坛日报》,1930年6月15日:1和10,10;晚宴荣誉工会主席。预测工党将摆脱帮派癌症。”《芝加哥论坛日报》1940年5月17日:5;“市长领导了一场运动,以清除掠夺贸易的帮派。”《纽约时报》,1931年6月26日:4点1分和4分;“联邦人员取得成果。”《纽约时报》,1931年8月23日:2.7奥斯古德·尼科尔斯,“侦探追踪他们的人。”《华盛顿邮报》1934年9月16日:SM5和SM18在SM5.8“希特勒和斯大林被比作卡彭和彭德加斯特。”洛杉矶时报。1939年11月3日:3。参见哈德利,险恶的阴影,321.9“指控癌症身体歹徒。”斯波坎每日纪事报,1931年11月16日:7.10异能,G-Men.11斯克拉,城市男孩,8.12“智力”;“癌症教育有效吗?”蓝石,“癌症教育的重要性”;Lakeman,“癌症教育”;利特尔,《如何教育妇女》;Rigney,《医学宣传有效吗?》13穆丽尔·弗莱明,“示范健康讲座。”魔法部,不。1944年1月1日:32-3。“癌症,疾病中的‘强盗’,是可以治愈的,这是一个信息。”密尔沃基新闻哨兵报,1941年4月13日:10-A;时间就是生命;对抗癌症。关于电影,请参阅康托的《选择生活》。14 Ruth,《发明公敌》,第2-3.15 Isaac F. Marcosson,《第五纵队疾病——癌症》。《纽约客》第16期,不。1940年第2期:9.16阿代尔,“科学动员”,678.17诺瓦克,“癌症”,820.18克拉伦斯·c·利特尔,“榨取公众”。癌症斗士的将军回应三月关于牛奶的文章。《加冕杂志》,1937年5月2日:23-9,23.19普罗克特,《癌症战争》,20马考森,《癌症是第五纵队的疾病》,9.21小约翰·f·蒂姆斯夫人,《动员世界癌症专家》,11.22 Schrecker,《许多是犯罪》,14.23 Krahn,《教育电影指南》,425。关于“内部叛徒”隐喻的用法,见Woglom,“肿瘤抵抗的批判”,284;哈扎姆,“阻止那个歹徒”,马丁内斯,“自然中的人”,45.26同上,299.27康托尔,“在幸存者之前”;康托,《选择生活》 28吉尔伯特:《愤怒的循环》;29 . Alton L. Blakeslee,“生物“黑帮”电影中与癌症抗争的故事”。奥克兰论坛报》。1950年4月2日:22- 30Pickett,“我们在癌症问题上的立场如何?”22.31斯宾塞,“问题”,509.32斯宾塞,“癌症研究的意义”,1362。参见约翰逊的《面对事实》,6.33“彩电破坏阅读就像癌症破坏身体一样。”《林肯星报》(内布拉斯加州)1975年12月29日:9.34美国版。国会。第83届国会,A368-9 at A369。更一般地说,关于意大利裔美国人对黑帮的种族形象的反应,见伯恩斯坦,《最大的威胁》,凯弗维尔,《美国的犯罪》,《接近‘贱民’》;瓦希马吉,《贱民》;威尔逊,《Gang Busters》;伯恩斯坦,《最大的威胁》,61-83.37美国癌症协会,1950年年度报告,15.38《内部叛徒》,1946年见“费城癌症电视节目”。巨蟹座新闻,1947年5月:12。"癌症电影最近在芝加哥播出由美国癌症协会和伊利诺伊集团制作"巨蟹座新闻,1948年2月:11;“如何告诉邻居。”其他电视剧请见“志愿者演员”“综艺”;美国癌症协会,1956年年度报告,27;“癌症招摇撞骗。”信号。[ACS]公众教育通讯第1期1. 1957年8月,4名;“江湖骗子”。信号。[ACS]公众教育通讯,第1期1. 1957年8月:4.39埃米尔·考文,《战术》《癌症新闻》第13期。1959年夏季:9-12.40“电视之眼”。" 41 "广播和电视材料。43《与心脏病作斗争》伯恩斯坦,《最大的威胁》255.44;奥尔索普,《走私者》,379.45詹姆斯·w·巴顿,《乳腺癌是如何传播的》新闻(纽波特,罗德岛)1956年1月31日:13.46达文波特和劳埃德:《公共政策是如何变成战争的》。47欲了解有关《教父》的大量文献,请参阅布朗,弗朗西斯·福特·科波拉的《教父》48页豪厄尔,《街头帮派史》关于捐助者的说明:大卫·康托,社会调查中心(CIS),社会研究中心Económico (IDES), Aráoz 2838,布宜诺斯艾利斯城Autónoma C1425 DGT,阿根廷;马里兰大学公共卫生学院,4200 Valley Drive, 2242 Suite, College Park, MD 20742-2611, USA。电子邮件:djcantor@hotmail.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Media History
Media History COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信