Research on information collaboration strategy of fresh agricultural products supply chain under carbon cap-and-trade

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Yang Yang, Guanxin Yao
{"title":"Research on information collaboration strategy of fresh agricultural products supply chain under carbon cap-and-trade","authors":"Yang Yang, Guanxin Yao","doi":"10.1051/ro/2023155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The information coordination of fresh agricultural products supply chain is conducive to improving the overall efficiency and competitiveness of the supply chain, and reducing carbon emissions. Under the carbon cap-and-trade policy, this paper constructed an evolutionary game model of supply chain information collaboration involving a fresh agricultural products supplier, a cold chain logistics service provider and a fresh agricultural products retailer, explored the selection of information collaboration strategies of each subject, and simulated it with system dynamics. The results show that: The stability strategy of the game system is related to the initial willingness of each subject. When any two parties participate in information collaboration, the other party will also choose to participate in collaboration. In addition, the choice of information collaboration strategy of the subject is also related to the collaborative planning ability, collaborative strategy formulation ability, consumers’ preference, the initial cost of each subject, revenue sharing and cost sharing mechanism, government subsidies, government regulation and carbon cap-and-trade policy. It is worth noting that the collaborative planning capability is more conducive to promoting the subject to choose information collaborative strategy than the collaborative strategy formulation capability; the carbon trading price has a greater impact on the subject's participation in collaboration, while the total amount of carbon quota has no impact on the choice of the subject's information collaboration strategy. Furthermore, based on the research results, the corresponding management suggestions are put forward from the two aspects of the government and the participants.","PeriodicalId":54509,"journal":{"name":"Rairo-Operations Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rairo-Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2023155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The information coordination of fresh agricultural products supply chain is conducive to improving the overall efficiency and competitiveness of the supply chain, and reducing carbon emissions. Under the carbon cap-and-trade policy, this paper constructed an evolutionary game model of supply chain information collaboration involving a fresh agricultural products supplier, a cold chain logistics service provider and a fresh agricultural products retailer, explored the selection of information collaboration strategies of each subject, and simulated it with system dynamics. The results show that: The stability strategy of the game system is related to the initial willingness of each subject. When any two parties participate in information collaboration, the other party will also choose to participate in collaboration. In addition, the choice of information collaboration strategy of the subject is also related to the collaborative planning ability, collaborative strategy formulation ability, consumers’ preference, the initial cost of each subject, revenue sharing and cost sharing mechanism, government subsidies, government regulation and carbon cap-and-trade policy. It is worth noting that the collaborative planning capability is more conducive to promoting the subject to choose information collaborative strategy than the collaborative strategy formulation capability; the carbon trading price has a greater impact on the subject's participation in collaboration, while the total amount of carbon quota has no impact on the choice of the subject's information collaboration strategy. Furthermore, based on the research results, the corresponding management suggestions are put forward from the two aspects of the government and the participants.
碳限额与交易下生鲜农产品供应链信息协同策略研究
生鲜农产品供应链的信息协调有利于提高供应链的整体效率和竞争力,减少碳排放。在碳限额与交易政策下,构建了生鲜农产品供应商、冷链物流服务商和生鲜农产品零售商的供应链信息协作演化博弈模型,探讨了各主体的信息协作策略选择,并用系统动力学方法进行了模拟。结果表明:博弈系统的稳定性策略与各主体的初始意愿有关。当任何一方参与信息协作时,另一方也会选择参与协作。此外,主体的信息协同策略选择还与协同规划能力、协同策略制定能力、消费者偏好、各主体的初始成本、收益分享与成本分担机制、政府补贴、政府监管、碳限额与交易政策等因素有关。值得注意的是,协同规划能力比协同战略制定能力更有利于促进主体选择信息协同战略;碳交易价格对主体参与协作的影响较大,而碳配额总量对主体信息协作策略的选择没有影响。在此基础上,从政府和参与者两个方面提出了相应的管理建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rairo-Operations Research
Rairo-Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
206
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: RAIRO-Operations Research is an international journal devoted to high-level pure and applied research on all aspects of operations research. All papers published in RAIRO-Operations Research are critically refereed according to international standards. Any paper will either be accepted (possibly with minor revisions) either submitted to another evaluation (after a major revision) or rejected. Every effort will be made by the Editorial Board to ensure a first answer concerning a submitted paper within three months, and a final decision in a period of time not exceeding six months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信