Validation of the Multidimensional Workaholism Scale in the Netherlands

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Sait Gürbüz, Marianne van Woerkom, Dorien T. A. M. Kooij, Evelien P. M. Brouwers
{"title":"Validation of the Multidimensional Workaholism Scale in the Netherlands","authors":"Sait Gürbüz,&nbsp;Marianne van Woerkom,&nbsp;Dorien T. A. M. Kooij,&nbsp;Evelien P. M. Brouwers","doi":"10.1111/ijsa.12455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although extant research shows detrimental consequences of workaholism, well-known workaholism scales have been commented on for the lack of construct clarity and validity. The Multidimensional Workaholism Scale (MWS), a new measure developed in the United States, offers both conceptual and psychometric advantages over previous workaholism scales, yet it has not been fully validated in different countries. This study aimed to adapt the MWS to a Northern European context (i.e., the Netherlands) and examine its factorial, convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity. To evaluate the psychometric properties and validity of the Dutch version of MWS, a sample of 366 Dutch employees was surveyed. The analyses showed that the subdimensions of the Dutch MWS had internal consistency and convergent validity with obsessive passion, workload, and the Dutch Work Addiction Scale. Moreover, the Dutch MWS showed good discriminant validity and modest incremental validity. Researchers in Dutch-speaking nations can use the Dutch version to learn more about workaholism.</p>","PeriodicalId":51465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","volume":"32 2","pages":"169-181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsa.12455","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12455","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although extant research shows detrimental consequences of workaholism, well-known workaholism scales have been commented on for the lack of construct clarity and validity. The Multidimensional Workaholism Scale (MWS), a new measure developed in the United States, offers both conceptual and psychometric advantages over previous workaholism scales, yet it has not been fully validated in different countries. This study aimed to adapt the MWS to a Northern European context (i.e., the Netherlands) and examine its factorial, convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity. To evaluate the psychometric properties and validity of the Dutch version of MWS, a sample of 366 Dutch employees was surveyed. The analyses showed that the subdimensions of the Dutch MWS had internal consistency and convergent validity with obsessive passion, workload, and the Dutch Work Addiction Scale. Moreover, the Dutch MWS showed good discriminant validity and modest incremental validity. Researchers in Dutch-speaking nations can use the Dutch version to learn more about workaholism.

在荷兰验证多维工作狂量表
尽管现有研究表明工作狂会带来有害后果,但知名的工作狂量表却因缺乏清晰的结构和有效性而备受诟病。多维工作狂量表(MWS)是美国开发的一种新量表,与以往的工作狂量表相比,它在概念和心理测量方面都具有优势,但尚未在不同国家得到充分验证。本研究旨在将 MWS 改用于北欧环境(即荷兰),并检验其因子效度、收敛效度、判别效度和增量效度。为了评估荷兰版 MWS 的心理测量特性和有效性,我们对 366 名荷兰员工进行了抽样调查。分析结果表明,荷兰语 MWS 的子维度与强迫激情、工作量和荷兰语工作成瘾量表具有内部一致性和收敛有效性。此外,荷兰语 MWS 还显示出良好的判别效度和适度的增量效度。荷兰语国家的研究人员可以使用荷兰语版本了解更多有关工作狂的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
31.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Selection and Assessment publishes original articles related to all aspects of personnel selection, staffing, and assessment in organizations. Using an effective combination of academic research with professional-led best practice, IJSA aims to develop new knowledge and understanding in these important areas of work psychology and contemporary workforce management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信