New approach methodologies (NAM) to characterize neurotoxic chemicals for use in risk assessment: case study of four neurotoxic pesticides

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Marilyn Silva
{"title":"New approach methodologies (NAM) to characterize neurotoxic chemicals for use in risk assessment: case study of four neurotoxic pesticides","authors":"Marilyn Silva","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2258985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractNeurotoxic pesticides: Cyfluthrin (CYF), βCYF, endosulfan (ENDO) and chlorpyrifos-oxon (CPFO) were examined using new approach methodologies (NAM) to assess ToxCast in vitro neurotoxic assay activities (50% concentration–AC50s), chemical-target specificity (Z-Scores) and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation with ToxCast assay AC50s as inputs to calculate human Administered Equivalent Dose (AEDHuman mg/kg) through Integrated Chemical Environment (ICE) models. Fold differences (FD) between AEDHuman NAM predictions and adjusted (animal to human interspecies extrapolation) in vivo regulatory neurotoxicity points of departure (POD) were calculated to assess modeled predictions against measured in vivo data. Interspecies (animal to human) in vivo adjusted PODs were 0.147 mg/kg/d (CYF/βCYF), 0.180 mg/kg/d (ENDO) and 0.106 mg/kg/d (CPFO). ToxCast neurotoxicity assay results supported in vivo observations: CYF, βCYF and CPFO showed depressed neuroactivity, while ENDO showed increased neuroactivity. βCYF is known to have twice the toxicity of CYF in vivo but was less toxic in the in vitro assays. Percent assays with Z-Scores greater than 3 for CYF, βCYF, ENDO and CPFO were 100%, 100%, 67% and 71% respectively. Most AEDHuman were less than 10-FD indicating good predictivity of the in vivo adjusted PODs with ICE models. The NAMs were useful for characterizing the main neurotoxic activities and the ICE models were highly predictive of in vivo PODs to support mechanisms in risk assessment.Keywords: New approach methodologiesToxCastintegrated chemical environmentneurotoxic pesticides AcknowledgmentsI want to thank Dr. Eric Kwok Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency for technical support for this project and Dr. Poorni Iyer, PhD, DABT Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency for help reviewing this work.Authors’ contributionsI am the sole author of this work.Disclosure statementThe author declares that he has no actual or potential competing conflict of interests.","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2258985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractNeurotoxic pesticides: Cyfluthrin (CYF), βCYF, endosulfan (ENDO) and chlorpyrifos-oxon (CPFO) were examined using new approach methodologies (NAM) to assess ToxCast in vitro neurotoxic assay activities (50% concentration–AC50s), chemical-target specificity (Z-Scores) and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation with ToxCast assay AC50s as inputs to calculate human Administered Equivalent Dose (AEDHuman mg/kg) through Integrated Chemical Environment (ICE) models. Fold differences (FD) between AEDHuman NAM predictions and adjusted (animal to human interspecies extrapolation) in vivo regulatory neurotoxicity points of departure (POD) were calculated to assess modeled predictions against measured in vivo data. Interspecies (animal to human) in vivo adjusted PODs were 0.147 mg/kg/d (CYF/βCYF), 0.180 mg/kg/d (ENDO) and 0.106 mg/kg/d (CPFO). ToxCast neurotoxicity assay results supported in vivo observations: CYF, βCYF and CPFO showed depressed neuroactivity, while ENDO showed increased neuroactivity. βCYF is known to have twice the toxicity of CYF in vivo but was less toxic in the in vitro assays. Percent assays with Z-Scores greater than 3 for CYF, βCYF, ENDO and CPFO were 100%, 100%, 67% and 71% respectively. Most AEDHuman were less than 10-FD indicating good predictivity of the in vivo adjusted PODs with ICE models. The NAMs were useful for characterizing the main neurotoxic activities and the ICE models were highly predictive of in vivo PODs to support mechanisms in risk assessment.Keywords: New approach methodologiesToxCastintegrated chemical environmentneurotoxic pesticides AcknowledgmentsI want to thank Dr. Eric Kwok Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency for technical support for this project and Dr. Poorni Iyer, PhD, DABT Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency for help reviewing this work.Authors’ contributionsI am the sole author of this work.Disclosure statementThe author declares that he has no actual or potential competing conflict of interests.
表征用于风险评估的神经毒性化学品的新方法方法:四种神经毒性农药的案例研究
摘要采用新方法方法(NAM)评估ToxCast体外神经毒性测定活性(50%浓度- ac50)、化学靶标特异性(Z-Scores),并以ToxCast测定ac50为输入,通过综合化学环境(ICE)模型计算人体给药等效剂量(AEDHuman mg/kg),研究了氟氰菊酯(CYF)、βCYF、硫丹(ENDO)和毒死蜱(CPFO)等神经毒性农药。计算AEDHuman NAM预测和调整(动物到人类种间外推)体内调节性神经毒性出发点(POD)之间的Fold difference (FD),以评估模型预测与体内测量数据之间的差异。种间(动物-人)体内调节pod分别为0.147 mg/kg/d (CYF/βCYF)、0.180 mg/kg/d (ENDO)和0.106 mg/kg/d (CPFO)。ToxCast神经毒性实验结果支持体内观察:CYF、βCYF和CPFO表现为神经活性降低,而ENDO表现为神经活性升高。已知βCYF在体内的毒性是CYF的两倍,但在体外试验中的毒性较低。CYF、βCYF、ENDO和CPFO的z - score大于3的检测率分别为100%、100%、67%和71%。大多数AEDHuman小于10-FD,表明ICE模型对体内调节pod具有良好的预测性。NAMs可用于表征主要的神经毒性活动,ICE模型可高度预测体内pod,以支持风险评估机制。我要感谢Eric Kwok博士对本项目的技术支持,感谢加州环境保护局农药监管部的技术支持,感谢加州环境保护局环境健康危害评估办公室的Poorni Iyer博士对本工作的帮助。作者的贡献我是这部作品的唯一作者。披露声明作者声明他没有实际的或潜在的竞争利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Human and Ecological Risk Assessment provides a resource for professionals researching and assessing environmental hazards to both humans and ecological systems. The editors expect papers published to be original, of sound science, purposeful for risk analysis (assessment, communication, management) and related areas, well written (in English), and a contribution to the scientific literature. The journal''s emphasis is on publication of papers that contribute to improvements in human and ecological health. The journal is an international, fully peer-reviewed publication that publishes eight issues annually. The journal''s scope includes scientific and technical information and critical analysis in the following areas: -Quantitative Risk Assessment- Comparative Risk Assessment- Integrated Human & Ecological Risk Assessment- Risk Assessment Applications to Human & Ecosystems Health- Exposure Assessment- Environmental Fate Assessment- Multi-Media Assessment- Hazard Assessment- Environmental Epidemiology- Statistical Models and Methods- Methods Development/Improvement- Toxicokinetics Modeling- Animal to Human Extrapolation- Risk Perception/Communication- Risk Management- Regulatory Issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信