Effects of Varying the Location of Perceived Consequentiality Elicitation in a Discrete Choice Experiment Survey

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ewa Zawojska, Malte Welling, Julian Sagebiel
{"title":"Effects of Varying the Location of Perceived Consequentiality Elicitation in a Discrete Choice Experiment Survey","authors":"Ewa Zawojska, Malte Welling, Julian Sagebiel","doi":"10.3368/le.100.2.040320-0048r1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> Stated preference studies increasingly elicit respondents’ perceptions about survey consequentiality to mitigate hypothetical bias concerns and enhance validity of value estimates. A typical practice is to ask about these perceptions after preferences. We examine the sensitivity of the perceptions, willingness-to-pay estimates, and the relationship between them to the perception elicitation location in a discrete choice experiment survey. Our empirical results suggest that the location matters: the perceptions and willingness-to-pay values are affected. In our data, the self-reported consequentiality is stronger when elicited before, rather than after, the preferences. We discuss implications of the findings for elicitation of perceived consequentiality.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/le.100.2.040320-0048r1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stated preference studies increasingly elicit respondents’ perceptions about survey consequentiality to mitigate hypothetical bias concerns and enhance validity of value estimates. A typical practice is to ask about these perceptions after preferences. We examine the sensitivity of the perceptions, willingness-to-pay estimates, and the relationship between them to the perception elicitation location in a discrete choice experiment survey. Our empirical results suggest that the location matters: the perceptions and willingness-to-pay values are affected. In our data, the self-reported consequentiality is stronger when elicited before, rather than after, the preferences. We discuss implications of the findings for elicitation of perceived consequentiality.
在离散选择实验调查中,改变感知后果性引出位置的影响
陈述偏好研究越来越多地引出受访者对调查结果的看法,以减轻假设偏见的担忧,提高价值估计的有效性。一个典型的做法是在偏好之后询问这些看法。在离散选择实验调查中,我们研究了感知的敏感性,支付意愿估计,以及它们与感知启发位置之间的关系。我们的实证结果表明,地理位置是重要的:感知和支付意愿的价值受到影响。在我们的数据中,当在偏好之前而不是之后被引出时,自我报告的结果性更强。我们讨论了这些发现对感知后果性的启发的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信