Roles, Constraints, and Prospects of Scientific Knowledge Transfer at Science Shared Campus of Kotebe University of Education

{"title":"Roles, Constraints, and Prospects of Scientific Knowledge Transfer at Science Shared Campus of Kotebe University of Education","authors":"","doi":"10.61489/30053447.1.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theoretical and conceptual frameworks for the current research are adapted from: the \"problem solving model\" and the SECI model. We employed different tools for data collection, such as questionnaires, observation, interviews, and document reviews. Based on the procedures of the lottery method, 114 students and their respective parents out of the total 350 students could participate and were involved in. The main output of this study is obtained by using descriptive tools for quantitative data. As a result, about 56.7% of student respondents, 61.9% of parent respondents, and 50%of teachers saw that external knowledge transfer was carried out in the field of natural science through academicians, researchers, and laboratory experts with unreserved effort owing to paid for their effort. On the other hand, qualitative data were analyzed by verbatim translation and interpretation to be validated by the principals, top scorer students, cluster coordinates, and key informants. The constraints on scientific knowledge transfer are internal factors in the instructors’ views like communication problems, language problems, interpretation problems, and technologies and techniques that are used in the transfer of knowledge. Besides, externalized system and management perspectives of scientific knowledge transfer from the instructors, like language and system teachers, to students were observed. The result of this study dealt with validated and reliable dates that were strongly aggregated and triangulated within the keynote person's mission. As a result, concerns about time, scope, language, complexity, and strategy were barriers.","PeriodicalId":497759,"journal":{"name":"Kotebe Journal of Education","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kotebe Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61489/30053447.1.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theoretical and conceptual frameworks for the current research are adapted from: the "problem solving model" and the SECI model. We employed different tools for data collection, such as questionnaires, observation, interviews, and document reviews. Based on the procedures of the lottery method, 114 students and their respective parents out of the total 350 students could participate and were involved in. The main output of this study is obtained by using descriptive tools for quantitative data. As a result, about 56.7% of student respondents, 61.9% of parent respondents, and 50%of teachers saw that external knowledge transfer was carried out in the field of natural science through academicians, researchers, and laboratory experts with unreserved effort owing to paid for their effort. On the other hand, qualitative data were analyzed by verbatim translation and interpretation to be validated by the principals, top scorer students, cluster coordinates, and key informants. The constraints on scientific knowledge transfer are internal factors in the instructors’ views like communication problems, language problems, interpretation problems, and technologies and techniques that are used in the transfer of knowledge. Besides, externalized system and management perspectives of scientific knowledge transfer from the instructors, like language and system teachers, to students were observed. The result of this study dealt with validated and reliable dates that were strongly aggregated and triangulated within the keynote person's mission. As a result, concerns about time, scope, language, complexity, and strategy were barriers.
神户教育大学科学共享校园中科学知识转移的角色、制约与展望
当前研究的理论和概念框架改编自:“问题解决模型”和SECI模型。我们采用了不同的工具来收集数据,如问卷调查、观察、访谈和文献回顾。根据抽签方式的程序,在350名学生中,有114名学生和他们各自的家长可以参加并参与。本研究的主要成果是通过使用描述性工具获得定量数据。结果,约56.7%的学生受访者、61.9%的家长受访者和50%的教师认为,自然科学领域的外部知识转移是通过院士、研究人员和实验室专家进行的,由于他们的付出是有报酬的,因此付出了毫无保留地努力。另一方面,定性数据通过逐字翻译和口译进行分析,由校长、高分学生、聚类坐标和关键线人进行验证。在教师看来,科学知识转移的制约因素是内部因素,如沟通问题、语言问题、翻译问题以及知识转移中使用的技术和技巧。此外,还观察了教师(如语言教师和系统教师)向学生转移科学知识的外化系统和管理视角。这项研究的结果处理了经过验证和可靠的日期,这些日期在主讲人的使命范围内被强烈汇总和三角化。因此,对时间、范围、语言、复杂性和策略的关注成为了障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信