Alternating Transfer Functions to Prevent Overfitting in Non-Linear Regression with Neural Networks

Philipp Seitz, Jan Schmitt
{"title":"Alternating Transfer Functions to Prevent Overfitting in Non-Linear Regression with Neural Networks","authors":"Philipp Seitz, Jan Schmitt","doi":"10.1080/0952813x.2023.2270995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In nonlinear regression with machine learning methods, neural networks (NNs) are ideally suited due to their universal approximation property, which states that arbitrary nonlinear functions can thereby be approximated arbitrarily well. Unfortunately, this property also poses the problem that data points with measurement errors can be approximated too well and unknown parameter subspaces in the estimation can deviate far from the actual value (so-called overfitting). Various developed methods aim to reduce overfitting through modifications in several areas of the training. In this work, we pursue the question of how an NN behaves in training with respect to overfitting when linear and nonlinear transfer functions (TF) are alternated in different hidden layers (HL). The presented approach is applied to a generated dataset and contrasted to established methods from the literature, both individually and in combination. Comparable results are obtained, whereby the common use of purely nonlinear transfer functions proves to be not recommended generally.","PeriodicalId":133720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence","volume":"885 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813x.2023.2270995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In nonlinear regression with machine learning methods, neural networks (NNs) are ideally suited due to their universal approximation property, which states that arbitrary nonlinear functions can thereby be approximated arbitrarily well. Unfortunately, this property also poses the problem that data points with measurement errors can be approximated too well and unknown parameter subspaces in the estimation can deviate far from the actual value (so-called overfitting). Various developed methods aim to reduce overfitting through modifications in several areas of the training. In this work, we pursue the question of how an NN behaves in training with respect to overfitting when linear and nonlinear transfer functions (TF) are alternated in different hidden layers (HL). The presented approach is applied to a generated dataset and contrasted to established methods from the literature, both individually and in combination. Comparable results are obtained, whereby the common use of purely nonlinear transfer functions proves to be not recommended generally.
交替传递函数防止神经网络非线性回归过拟合
在机器学习方法的非线性回归中,神经网络(nn)由于其普遍近似性质而非常适合,这表明任意非线性函数可以因此被任意地近似。不幸的是,这一特性也带来了一个问题,即具有测量误差的数据点可能被逼近得太好,估计中的未知参数子空间可能偏离实际值很远(所谓的过拟合)。各种已开发的方法旨在通过对训练的几个方面进行修改来减少过拟合。在这项工作中,我们研究了当线性和非线性传递函数(TF)在不同的隐藏层(HL)中交替时,神经网络在训练中如何处理过拟合的问题。所提出的方法应用于生成的数据集,并与文献中建立的方法进行对比,无论是单独的还是组合的。得到了可比较的结果,由此证明一般不推荐使用纯非线性传递函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信